medigraphic.com
Anales de Otorrinolaringología Mexicana

2024, Number 3

<< Back Next >>

Otorrinolaringología 2024; 69 (3)

Prevalence of neonatal hearing loss: Neonatal auditory screening study

García AL, García GCE, Velasco CJC, Vargas RLJ

Language: Spanish
References: 29
Page: 185-194
PDF size: 178.89 Kb.


ABSTRACT

Objective: To determine the prevalence of neonatal hearing loss in newborns from eastern Colombia.
Materials and Methods: An observational, descriptive study was carried out from November 28, 2015 to April 30, 2016, where newborns at the Hospital Regional de la Orinoquia, Colombia, were included. Hearing tests were performed based on the national protocols. The database was registered in Excel version 2013 and analyzed with the statistical program SPSS version 22.
Results: Two thousand forty otoacoustic emissions tests were carried out. The prevalence of neonatal hearing loss was 1.32% (95% CI: 0.82-1.81). The highest frequency of hearing impairment was in the right ear (44.4%), followed by the left ear (33.3%) and bilateral in 22.2%.
Conclusions: The prevalence of neonatal hearing loss was 1.3%. The factors associated with the appearance of neonatal hearing loss were family history, prematurity, ICU stay longer than 5 days, hyperbilirubinemia and cleft lip.


REFERENCES

  1. Delgado DJ. Detección precoz de la hipoacusia infantil. Rev Pediatr Aten Primaria 2011; 13 (50): 279-297.Disponible en: http://scielo.isciii.es/scielo.php script=sci_arttext&pid=S1139-76322011000200012&lng=es

  2. Mazzi Gonzales de Prada E. Hipoacusia neonatal. Rev Bol Ped 2015; 54 (2): 77-80.

  3. Su BM, Chan DK. Prevalence of hearing loss in US children and adolescents: Findings from NHANES 1988-2010. JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2017; 143 (9): 920-927. doi: 10.1001/jamaoto.2017.0953

  4. Fletcher KT, Horrell EMW, Ayugi J, et al. The natural history and rehabilitative outcomes of hearingloss in congenital cytomegalovirus: A systematic review. Otol Neurotol 2018; 39 (7): 854-864. doi:10.1097/MAO.0000000000001861

  5. Manno FAM, Rodríguez-Cruces R, Kumar R, Ratnanather JT, Lau C. Hearing loss impacts gray and whitematter across the lifespan: Systematic review, meta-analysis and meta-regression. Neuroimage 2021; 231:117826. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2021.117826

  6. Martínez-Pacheco MC, Ferrán de la Cierva L, García Purriños FJ. Retraso en el diagnóstico de sordera infantil:el valor de los falsos negativos en el Programa de Detección Precoz de Hipoacusias Neonatales. ActaOtorrinolaringol Esp 2016. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.otorri.2016.01.004

  7. Comisión para la Detección Precoz de la Hipoacusia Infantil (CODEPEH). Propuesta para la detección eintervención precoz de la hipoacusia infantil. Informe de expertos. An Esp Pediatr 1999; 51: 336-44.

  8. González de Dios J, Ortega-Páez E, Perdikidis Olivieri L, Esparza Olcina MJ. El cribado universal de hipoacusiasolo ha demostrado a medio plazo una leve mejoría en el desarrollo del lenguaje, fundamentado enestudios de bajo nivel de evidencia científica. Evid Pediatr 2010; 6 (2): 32.

  9. The Joint Committee on Infant Hearing. Year 2019 Position Statement: Principles and Guidelines for EarlyHearing Detection and Intervention Programs. J Early Hearing Detect Interv 2019; 4 (2): 1-44.

  10. Rojas-Godoy AL, Gómez-Gómez O, Rivas-Muñoz FA. Cumplimiento de la normatividad vigente para la deteccióntemprana de la hipoacusia neonatal. Rev Salud Pública 2024; 16 (3): 462-469. https://doi.org/10.15446/rsap.v16n3.29149

  11. Colombia. Ministerio de Salud y Protección Social, Colciencias. Guía de práctica clínica del recién nacidoprematuro. Guías 04. Bogotá 2013.

  12. Colombia. Ministerio de Salud y Protección Social, Colciencias. Tamización visual y auditiva en recién nacidosprematuros – Hoja de evidencia 4. 2014.

  13. Kennedy C, McCann D, Campbell MJ, Kimm L, Thornton R. Universal newborn screening for permanentchildhood hearing impairment: an 8-year follow-up of a controlled trial. Lancet 2005; 366 (9486): 660-662.doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(05)67138-3

  14. Korver AM, Konings S, Dekker FW, et al. Newborn hearing screening vs later hearing screening and developmentaloutcomes in children with permanent childhood hearing impairment. JAMA 2010; 304 (15):1701-1708. doi:10.1001/jama.2010.1501

  15. Johnson JL, White KR, Widen JE, et al. A multicenter evaluation of how many infants with permanenthearing loss pass a two-stage otoacoustic emissions/automated auditory brainstem response newborn hearingscreening protocol. Pediatrics 2005; 116 (3): 663-672. doi:10.1542/peds.2004-1688

  16. Cabra J, Monux A, Grijalva M, Echarri R, Ruiz de Gauna E. Implantación de un programa para la detecciónprecoz de hipoacusia neonatal. Acta Otorrinolaringol Esp 2001; 52: 668-73 doi 10.1016/S0001-6519(01)78264-7

  17. Bailey HD, Bower C, Krishnaswamy J, Coates HL. Newborn hearing screening in Western Australia. MedJ Aust 2002; 177 (4): 180-185. doi:10.5694/j.1326-5377.2002.tb04728.x

  18. Borkoski Barreiro SA, Falcón González JC, Liminana Canal JM, Ramos Macías A. Evaluación del muy bajopeso (≤ 1.500 g) al nacer como indicador de riesgo para la hipoacusia neurosensorial. Acta OtorrinolaringolEsp 2013; 64: 403-8.

  19. Pimperton H, Blythe H, Kreppner J, et al. The impact of universal newborn hearing screening on long-termliteracy outcomes: a prospective cohort study. Arch Dis Child 2016; 101 (1): 9-15. doi:10.1136/archdischild-

  20. 2014-30751620. Wang J, Sung V, Carew P, et al. Prevalence of childhood hearing loss and secular trends: A systematic reviewand meta-analysis. Acad Pediatr 2019; 19 (5): 504-514. doi:10.1016/j.acap.2019.01.010

  21. Yang SM, Liu Y, Liu C, et al. Hearing-loss-associated gene detection in neonatal intensive care unit. J MaternFetal Neonatal Med 2018; 31 (3): 284-288. doi:10.1080/14767058.2017.1282454

  22. Towerman AS, Hayashi SS, Hayashi RJ, Hulbert ML. Prevalence and nature of hearing loss in a cohort ofchildren with sickle cell disease. Pediatr Blood Cancer 2019; 66 (1): e27457. doi:10.1002/pbc.27457

  23. Corujo-Santana C, Falcón-González JC, Borkoski-Barreiro SA, Pérez-Plasencia D, Ramos-Macías Á. Therelationship between neonatal hyperbilirubinemia and sensorineural hearing loss. Acta OtorrinolaringolEsp 2015; 66 (6): 326-331. doi:10.1016/j.otorri.2014.10.001

  24. González-Jiménez B, Delgado-Mendoza E, Rojano-González R, et al. Factores asociados a hipoacusia basadosen el programa Tamiz Auditivo Neonatal e Intervención Temprana. Rev Med Inst Mex Seguro Soc 2017;55 (1): 40-46.

  25. van Dommelen P, Mohangoo AD, Verkerk PH, van der Ploeg CP, van Straaten HL; Dutch NICU NeonatalHearing Screening Working Group. Risk indicators for hearing loss in infants treated in different neonatalintensive care units. Acta Paediatr 2010; 99 (3): 344-349. doi:10.1111/j.1651-2227.2009.01614.x

  26. Driscoll C, Beswick R, Doherty E, D’Silva R, Cross A. The validity of family history as a risk factor in pediatrichearing loss. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol 2015; 79 (5): 654-659. doi:10.1016/j.ijporl.2015.02.007

  27. van Dommelen P, Verkerk PH, van Straaten HL; Dutch Neonatal Intensive Care Unit Neonatal HearingScreening Working Group. Hearing loss by week of gestation and birth weight in very preterm neonates. JPediatr 2015; 166 (4): 840-3.e1. doi:10.1016/j.jpeds.2014.12.041

  28. SYROCOT (Systematic Review on Congenital Toxoplasmosis) study group, Thiébaut R, Leproust S, ChêneG, Gilbert R. Effectiveness of prenatal treatment for congenital toxoplasmosis: a meta-analysis of individualpatients' data. Lancet 2007; 369 (9556): 115-122. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(07)60072-5

  29. Leguizamón S, Agudelo L, Espejo H, Agudelo L, et al. Prevalencia de hipoacusia neonatal de la poblaciónatendida en el Hospital Regional de la Orinoquía, 2018: Estudio de tamizaje Auditivo Neonatal. Ciencia eInnovación en Salud 2021; e126: 188-197 DOI 10.17081/innosa.126




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com