medigraphic.com
ISSN 1561-3046 (Electronic)

2022, Number 2

<< Back Next >>

Rev Cub Med Mil 2022; 51 (2)

Influence of implant length on implant primary and secondary stability

Toro M, Leitao J, Yoma T, Chaple GA, Fernández E

Language: English
References: 20
Page:
PDF size: 222.43 Kb.


ABSTRACT

ntroduction: Implant stability can be measured at the moment of implant placement or once the osseointegration process is in progress. Many factors should be considered, including bone quality, osteotomy preparation, implant design, implant surface enhancement, and implant length and diameter.
Objective: Determine the influence of implant length on primary and secondary stability in type II and type III bones using resonance frequency analysis method.
Methods: A prospective study was conducted in the department of Oral maxillofacial Implantology at the School of Dentistry of the University of Chile between April 2006 and June 2007. 38 screw type implants were placed in the maxilla and mandible, in type II and type III bones. 21 implants had an average contact area of 237 mm2 including 2 sizes (3.75mm and a length of 13mm and 15mm) and 17 implants had an average contact area of 129 mm2 (diameter of 3.75mm and a length of 7mm). Implant primary stability was measured by the Implant Stability Quotient value. Resonance frequency measurements were recorded using Osstell™ Mentor. Secondary implant stability was recorded between 4 to 6 months after the implant placement.
Results: For implants with an average contact area of 237 mm2 the stability 1 average value was 71,37 and the stability 2 average value was 66,6. For implants with an average contact area of 129 mm2 the stability 1 average value was 67,47 and the stability 2 average value was 68,08.
Conclusion: Implant length does not influence primary and secondary stability in type II and type III bones.


REFERENCES

  1. Lozano-Carrascal N, Salomó-Coll O, Gilabert-Cerdà M, Farré-Pagés N, Gargallo-Albiol J, Hernández-Alfaro F. Effect of implant macro-design on primary stability: A prospective clinical study. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal. 2016; 21(2):e214-21. DOI: 10.4317/medoral.21024

  2. Vollmer A, Saravi B, Lang G, Adolphs N, Hazard D, Giers V, Stoll P. Factors Influencing Primary and Secondary Implant Stability-A Retrospective Cohort Study with 582 Implants in 272 Patients. Appl. Sci. 2020; 10(22): 8084. DOI: 10.3390/app10228084

  3. Kim HM, Cho J, Ryu J. Evaluation of implant stability using different implant drilling sequences. J Dent Sci. 2019; 14(2): 152-6. DOI: 10.1016/j.jds.2019.03.006

  4. Sargolzaie N, Samizade S, Arab H, Ghanbari H, Khodadadifard L, Khajavi A. The evaluation of implant stability measured by resonance frequency analysis in different bone types. J Korean Assoc Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2019; 45(1): 29-33. DOI: 10.5125/jkaoms.2019.45.1.29

  5. Miri R, Shirzadeh A, Kermani H, Khajavi A. Relationship and changes of primary and secondary stability in dental implants: A review. Int J Contemp Dent Med Rev. 2017: 03011. DOI: 10.15713/ins.ijcdmr.112

  6. Valderrama P, Oates TW, Jones AA, Simpson J, Schoolfield JD, Cochran DL. Evaluation of Two Different Resonance Frequency Devices to Detect Implant Stability: A Clinical Trial. J Periodontol. 2007;78(2): 262-72. DOI: 10.1902/jop.2007.060143

  7. Brunski JB, Puleo DA, Nanci A. Biomaterial and biomechanics of oral and maxillofacial implants: current status and future developments. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2000[acceso: 12/04/2022]; 15(1):15-46. Disponible en: Disponible en: http://medlib.yu.ac.kr/eur_j_oph/ijom/IJOMI/ijomi_15_15.pdf 7.

  8. Baftijari D, Benedetti A, Kirkov A, Iliev A, Stamatoski A, Baftijari F, et al. Assessment of Primary and Secondary Implant Stability by Resonance Frequency Analysis in Anterior and Posterior Segments of Maxillary Edentulous Ridges. J of IMAB. 2018;24(2): 2058-64. DOI: 10.5272/jimab.2018242.2058

  9. Han J, Zhang X, Tang Z, Zhang L, Shi D, Meng H. A prospective, multicenter study assessing the DENTSPLY Implants, OsseoSpeed (TM) TX, length 6 mm in the posterior maxilla and mandible: a 1-year follow-up study. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2016; 27(4): 452-7. DOI: 10.1111/clr.12587

  10. Kastala VH, Ramoji Rao MV. Comparative evaluation of implant stability in two different implant systems at baseline and 3-4 months intervals using RFA device (OSSTELL SQ). Indian J Dent Res. 2019; 30(5): 678-86. DOI: 10.4103/ijdr.IJDR_446_17

  11. Gulje F, Abrahamsson I, Chen S, Stanford C, Zadeh H, Palmer R. Implants of 6 mm vs. 11 mm lengths in the posterior maxilla and mandible: A 1-year multicenter randomized controlled trial. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2013; 24(12): 1325-31. DOI: 10.1111/clr.12001

  12. Lemos CA, Ferro-Alves ML, Okamoto R, Mendoca MR, Pellizzer EP. Short dental implants versus standard dental implants placed in the posterior jaws: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Dent. 2016; 47: 8-17. DOI: 10.1016/j.jdent.2016.01.005

  13. Toro M, Leitao J, Sánchez G, Díaz L, Chaple Gil A, Fernández E. Método simplificado para cuantificar el área oseointegrable de implantes dentales. Rev Cubana Invest Bioméd. 2020[acceso: 12/04/2022]; 39(3): e651. Disponible en: Disponible en: http://www.revibiomedica.sld.cu/index.php/ibi/article/view/651/750 13.

  14. Bischof M, Nedir R, Szmukler-Moncler S, Bernard JP, Samson J. Implant stability measurement of delayed and immediately loaded implants during healing. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2004; 15(5): 529-39. DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2004.01042.X

  15. Barikani H, Rashtak S, Akbari S, Fard MK, Rokn A. The effect of shape, length and diameter of implants on primary stability based on resonance frequency analysis. Dent Res J. 2014; 11: 87-91. DOI: 10.4103/1735-3327.127195

  16. Merheb J, Van Assche N, Coucke W, Jacobs R, Naert I, Quirynen M. Relationship between cortical bone thickness or computerized tomography-derived bone density values and implant stability. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2010; 21(6): 612-7. DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2009.01880.X

  17. Gómez-Polo M, Ortega R, Gómez-Polo C, Martín C, Celemín A, del Río J. Does length, diameter, or bone quality affect primary and secondary stability in self-tapping dental implants? J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2016; 74(7): 1344-53. DOI: 10.1016/j.joms.2016.03.011

  18. Das Neves FD, Fones D, Bernardes SR, do Prado CJ, Neto AJ . Short implants--an analysis of longitudinal studies. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2006; 21(1): 86-93.

  19. Rossi F, Ricci E, Marchetti C, Lang NP, Botticelli D. Early loading of single crowns supported by 6-mm-long implants with a moderately rough surface: a prospective 2-year follow-up cohort study. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2010; 21(9): 937-43. DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2010.01942.X

  20. Queiroz TP, Aguiar SC, Margonar R, de Souza Faloni AP, Gruber R, Luvizuto ER. Clinical study on survival rate of short implants placed in the posterior mandibular region: resonance frequency analysis. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2015; 26(9): 1036-42. DOI: 10.1111/clr.12394




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com