medigraphic.com
ISSN 2992-8036 (Electronic)
ISSN 2306-4102 (Print)
Órgano Oficial del Colegio Mexicano de Ortopedia y Traumatología

2024, Number 4

<< Back

Acta Ortop Mex 2024; 38 (4)

Navigated total knee arthroplasty: an alternative surgical technique for patients with gonarthrosis in Mexico

Palestino-Lara M, Rosenthal-Pereztman J, Valles-Figueroa J, Rodríguez-Reséndiz F, Olguín-Rodríguez M, Zapata-Rivera S

Language: Spanish
References: 41
Page: 267-272
PDF size: 196.11 Kb.


ABSTRACT

Total knee arthroplasty consists of the artificial replacement of the knee joint in its three compartments. One of its main challenges is the anatomical restoration of the joint line. The relief of inappropriate postoperative pain can lengthen the recovery time and increase the days of intrahospital stay and readmission. Total Navigated Knee Arthroplasty is considered one of the most innovative procedures in the treatment of knee osteoarthritis. It was introduced in the late 90s and there is currently good evidence, that navigation has greater precision in the position of the prosthetic components, compared to a manual instrumentation, especially the reduction of the atypical alignment values of the mechanical axis. The supporters of (TNKA) have argued that this technique can improve the score of functional scales, the alignment of the prosthetic components, revision rates and survival, because it reduces the percentage of atypical radiographic values in the alignment of the coronal and sagittal plane, greater precision in axial rotation of the components, improvement of the flexion gap and the extension gap and the soft tissue balance. In general, experience is gained, learning curves are improved and the complication rate is decreased with acceptable costs.


REFERENCES

  1. Golubovic Z, Mitkovic M, Macukanovic-Golubovic L, Micic I, Stojiljkovic P, Kutlesic-Stojanovic K, et al. Treatment of gonarthosis by total knee arthroplasty. Biotechnol Biotechnol Equip. 2006; 20(3): 145-49. doi: 10.1080/13102818.2006.10817393.

  2. Xie F, Lo NN, Pullenayegum EM, Tarride JE, O'Reilly DJ, Goeree R, et al. Evaluation of health outcomes in osteoarthritis patients after total knee replacement: a two-year follow-up. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2010; 8: 87. doi: 10.1186/1477-7525-8-87.

  3. Partington PF, Sawhney J, Rorabeck CH, Barrack RL, Moore J. Joint line restoration after revision total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1999; (367): 165-71.

  4. Vera-Avilés FA, Negrete-Corona J, Jiménez-Aquino JM. Artroplastía total de rodilla, pronóstico al restablecer la línea articular. Acta Ortop Mex. 2012; 26(6): 362-268.

  5. Singerman R, Heiple KG, Davy DT, Goldberg VM. Effect of tibial component position on patellar strain following total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 1995; 10(5): 651-6. doi: 10.1016/s0883-5403(05)80210-4.

  6. Calliess T, Ettinger M, Savov P, Karkosch R, Windhagen H. Individualized alignment in total knee arthroplasty using image-based robotic assistance: Video article. Orthopade. 2018; 47(10): 871-879. doi: 10.1007/s00132-018-3637-1.

  7. Salerno A, Hermann R. Efficacy and safety of steroid use for postoperative pain relief. Update and review of the medical literature. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2006; 88(6): 1361-72. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.D.03018.

  8. Burnett RS, Barrack RL. Computer-assisted total knee arthroplasty is currently of no proven clinical benefit: a systematic review. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2013; 471(1): 264-76. doi: 10.1007/s11999-012-2528-8.

  9. Berend ME, Ritter MA, Meding JB, Faris PM, Keating EM, Redelman R, et al. Tibial component failure mechanisms in total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2004; 428: 26-34. doi: 10.1097/01.blo.0000148578.22729.0e.

  10. Ishida K, Matsumoto T, Tsumura N, Kubo S, Kitagawa A, Chin T, et al. Mid-term outcomes of computer-assisted total knee arthroplasty. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2011; 19(7): 1107-1112. doi: 10.1007/s00167-010-1361-4.

  11. Magin MN. Computernavigierter Gelenkersatz am Knie mit dem Orthopilot [Computer-assisted total knee replacement (TKR) using Orthopilot navigation system]. Oper Orthop Traumatol. 2010; 22(1): 63-80. doi: 10.1007/s00064-010-3007-1.

  12. Moon YW, Ha CW, Do KH, Kim CY, Han JH, Na SE, et al. Comparison of robot-assisted and conventional total knee arthroplasty: a controlled cadaver study using multiparameter quantitative three-dimensional CT assessment of alignment. Comput Aided Surg. 2012; 17(2): 86-95. doi: 10.3109/10929088.2012.654408.

  13. da Mota E Albuquerque RF. Navigation in total knee arthroplasty. Rev Bras Ortop. 2015; 46(1): 18-22. doi: 10.1016/S2255-4971(15)30169-5.

  14. Song EK, Seon JK, Yim JH, Netravali NA, Bargar WL. Robotic-assisted TKA reduces postoperative alignment outliers and improves gap balance compared to conventional TKA. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2013; 471(1): 118-26. doi: 10.1007/s11999-012-2407-3.

  15. Mason JB, Fehring TK, Estok R, Banel D, Fahrbach K. Meta-analysis of alignment outcomes in computer-assisted total knee arthroplasty surgery. J Arthroplasty. 2007; 22(8): 1097-106. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2007.08.001.

  16. Bae DK, Song SJ. Computer assisted navigation in knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Surg. 2011; 3(4): 259-67. doi: 10.4055/cios.2011.3.4.259.

  17. Kim TK, Chang CB, Kang YG, Chung BJ, Cho HJ, Seong SC. Execution accuracy of bone resection and implant fixation in computer assisted minimally invasive total knee arthroplasty. Knee. 2010; 17(1): 23-8. doi: 10.1016/j.knee.2009.06.004.

  18. Graydon AJ, Malak S, Anderson IA, Pitto RP. Evaluation of accuracy of an electromagnetic computer-assisted navigation system in total knee arthroplasty. Int Orthop. 2009; 33(4): 975-9. doi: 10.1007/s00264-008-0586-z.

  19. Bauwens K, Matthes G, Wich M, Gebhard F, Hanson B, Ekkernkamp A, et al. Navigated total knee replacement. A meta-analysis. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2007; 89(2): 261-9. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.F.00601.

  20. Hart R, Janecek M, Cizmár I, Stipcák V, Kucera B, Filan P. Minimal-invasive und navigierte implantation von knietotalendoprothesen: radiologische analyse und frühe klinische ergebnisse [Minimally invasive and navigated implantation for total knee arthroplasty: X-ray analysis and early clinical results]. Orthopade. 2006; 35(5): 552-7. doi: 10.1007/s00132-006-0929-7.

  21. Bohling U, Schamberger H, Grittner U, Scholz J. Computerised and technical navigation in total knee-arthroplasty. J Orthopaed Traumatol. 2005; 6: 69-75. doi: 10.1007/s10195-005-0084-7.

  22. Matsumoto T, Tsumura N, Kurosaka M, Muratsu H, Kuroda R, Ishimoto K, et al. Prosthetic alignment and sizing in computer-assisted total knee arthroplasty. Int Orthop. 2004; 28(5): 282-5. doi: 10.1007/s00264-004-0562-1.

  23. Tolk JJ, Koot HW, Janssen RP. Computer navigated versus conventional total knee arthroplasty. J Knee Surg. 2012; 25(4): 347-52. doi: 10.1055/s-0031-1299670.

  24. Hart R, Janecek M, Chaker A, Bucek P. Total knee arthroplasty implanted with and without kinematic navigation. Int Orthop. 2003; 27(6): 366-9. doi: 10.1007/s00264-003-0501-6.

  25. Maculé-Beneyto F, Hernández-Vaquero D, Segur-Vilalta JM, Colomina-Rodríguez R, Hinarejos-Gomez P, García-Forcada I, et al. Navigation in total knee arthroplasty. A multicenter study. Int Orthop. 2006; 30(6): 536-40. doi: 10.1007/s00264-006-0126-7.

  26. Song EK, Seon JK, Park SJ, Jung WB, Park HW, Lee GW. Simultaneous bilateral total knee arthroplasty with robotic and conventional techniques: a prospective, randomized study. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2011; 19(7): 1069-1076. doi: 10.1007/s00167-011-1400-9.

  27. Prasad N, Padmanabhan V, Mullaji A. Blood loss in total knee arthroplasty: an analysis of risk factors. Int Orthop. 2007; 31(1): 39-44. doi: 10.1007/s00264-006-0096-9.

  28. Bellemans J, Vandenneucker H, Vanlauwe J. Robot-assisted total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2007; 464: 111-116. doi: 10.1097/BLO.0b013e318126c0c0.

  29. Callaghan JJ, Liu SS, Warth LC. Computer-assisted surgery: a wine before its time: in the affirmative. J Arthroplasty. 2006; 21(4 Suppl 1): 27-8. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2006.01.009.

  30. Konig DP, Michael JW, Eysel P, Münnich U, Lichtenstein T, Schnurr C. Navigation in der Endoprothetik. Die Kosten-Nutzen-Analyse einer orthopadischen Fachklinik [Computer-assisted joint replacement surgery. Financial and clinical impact for a specialised orthopaedic hospital]. Z Orthop Unfall. 2009; 147(6): 669-74. doi: 10.1055/s-0029-1185916.

  31. Pitto RP, Graydon AJ, Bradley L, Malak SF, Walker CG, Anderson IA. Accuracy of a computer-assisted navigation system for total knee replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2006; 88(5): 601-5. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.88B5.17431.

  32. Brin YS, Nikolaou VS, Joseph L, Zukor DJ, Antoniou J. Imageless computer assisted versus conventional total knee replacement. A Bayesian meta-analysis of 23 comparative studies. Int Orthop. 2011; 35(3): 331-9. doi: 10.1007/s00264-010-1008-6.

  33. Ochoa-Cázares R, Cuadra-Castillo M. Artroplastía total de rodilla navegada. ¿Por qué utilizarla? Acta Ortop Mex. 2013; 27(3): 205-210.

  34. Joskowicz L, Hazan EJ. Computer-aided orthopedic surgery: Incremental shift or paradigm change? Adv Exp Med Biol. 2018; 1093: 21-30. doi: 10.1007/978-981-13-1396-7_2.

  35. de Steiger RN, Liu YL, Graves SE. Computer navigation for total knee arthroplasty reduces revision rate for patients less than sixty-five years of age. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2015; 97(8): 635-42. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.M.01496.

  36. Kalairajah Y, Simpson D, Cossey AJ, Verrall GM, Spriggins AJ. Blood loss after total knee replacement: effects of computer-assisted surgery. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2005; 87(11): 1480-2. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.87B11.16474.

  37. Magin MN. Computernavigierter Gelenkersatz am Knie mit dem Orthopilot [Computer-assisted total knee replacement (TKR) using Orthopilot navigation system]. Oper Orthop Traumatol. 2010; 22(1): 63-80. doi: 10.1007/s00064-010-3007-1.

  38. Fehring TK, Mason JB, Moskal J, Pollock DC, Mann J, Williams VJ. When computer-assisted knee replacement is the best alternative. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2006; 452: 132-6. doi: 10.1097/01.blo.0000229363.50361.25.

  39. Browne JA, Cook C, Hofmann AA, Bolognesi MP. Postoperative morbidity and mortality following total knee arthroplasty with computer navigation. Knee. 2010; 17(2): 152-6. doi: 10.1016/j.knee.2009.08.002.

  40. Kayani B, Konan S, Tahmassebi J, Pietrzak JRT, Haddad FS. Robotic-arm assisted total knee arthroplasty is associated with improved early functional recovery and reduced time to hospital discharge compared with conventional jig-based total knee arthroplasty: a prospective cohort study. Bone Joint J. 2018; 100-B(7): 930-937. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.100B7.BJJ-2017-1449.R1.

  41. Antonios JK, Korber S, Sivasundaram L, Mayfield C, Kang HP, Oakes DA, et al. Trends in computer navigation and robotic assistance for total knee arthroplasty in the United States: an analysis of patient and hospital factors. Arthroplast Today. 2019; 5(1): 88-95. doi: 10.1016/j.artd.2019.01.002.




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com