medigraphic.com
ISSN 2992-8036 (Electronic)
ISSN 2306-4102 (Print)
Órgano Oficial del Colegio Mexicano de Ortopedia y Traumatología

2024, Number 4

<< Back Next >>

Acta Ortop Mex 2024; 38 (4)

Physical self-concept and health perception in treated for congenital clubfoot

Cadena-Pérez A, Juárez-Oseguera A, Ríos-Ruiz G, Martínez-Villalobos M

Language: Spanish
References: 30
Page: 214-219
PDF size: 156.46 Kb.


ABSTRACT

Background: the clubfoot is one of the most common pathologies in pediatric orthopedics. There are few studies of physical self-concept and perception of health in these patients. Material and methods: observational, descriptive, and cross-sectional study. Population aged 16 to 18 years with the diagnosis of clubfoot. Being a sample of 55 patients, who underwent the SF-36, Laaveg-Ponseti Health Questionnaire, and the Physical Self-Concept Questionnaire. Evaluating physical abilities, physical condition, physical attractiveness. Presence of pain, general health, total function, emotional role, mental health, and satisfaction after treatment.There were 3 groups, according to the treatment received. Group 1, made up of 16 patients, treated only with the Ponseti method. Group 2 with 13 patients who received treatment with the Ponseti method, postero-medial release and osteotomies in the midfoot and/or hindfoot. And group 3 with 26 patients, who received postero-medial release and midfoot and/or hindfoot osteotomies. Results: for the Laaveg-Ponseti questionnaire, comparing the score between the three groups, a statistically significant difference was found in group 1, with a higher score. In the Physical Self-Concept questionnaire and the SF-36 health questionnaire, no significant difference was found between the groups. Conclusion: the quality of life of patients with clubfoot are from excellent to good, no matter of the group to which they belonged. The state of physical and mental health by the SF-36 scale were fined. And physical self-concept evaluated was higher than the average. With these studies, we can expose a more comprehensive management. We find that the satisfaction of these patients will be fine in the future.


REFERENCES

  1. Pavone V, Chisari E, Vescio A, Lucenti L, Sessa G, Testa G. The etiology of idiopathic congenital talipes equinovarus: a systematic review. J Orthop Surg Res. 2018; 13(1): 206.

  2. Torres-Gómez A, Pérez-Salazar-Marina D, Cassis N. Pie equino varo aducto congénito, prevalencia en una población mexicana. Rev Mex Ortop Pediatr. 2010; 12(1): 15-8.

  3. Dibello D, Di Carlo V, Colin G, Barbi E, Galimberti AMC. What a paediatrician should know about congenital clubfoot. Ital J Pediatr. 2020; 46(1): 78.

  4. Gelfer Y, Wientroub S, Hughes K, Fontalis A, Eastwood DM. Congenital talipes equinovarus: a systematic review of relapse as a primary outcome of the Ponseti method. Bone Joint J. 2019; 101-B(6): 639?45.

  5. Morcuende JA, Dolan LA, Dietz FR, Ponseti IV. Radical reduction in the rate of extensive corrective surgery for clubfoot using the Ponseti method. Pediatrics. 2004; 113(2): 376?80.

  6. Zionts LE, Jew MH, Bauer KL, Ebramzadeh E, Sangiorgio SN. How many patients who have a clubfoot treated using the Ponseti method are likely to undergo a tendon transfer? J Pediatr Orthop. 2018; 38(7): 382-7.

  7. Garcia LC, de Jesus LR, Trindade MO, Garcia FC, Pinheiro ML, de Sá RJP. Evaluation of kite and Ponseti methods in the treatment of idiopathic congenital clubfoot. Acta Ortop Bras. 2018; 26(6): 366?9.

  8. Hosseinzadeh P, Kelly DM, Zionts LE. Management of the relapsed clubfoot following treatment using the Ponseti method. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2017; 25(3): 195?203.

  9. Dibello D, Colin G, Galimberti AMC, Di Carlo V. Ten year challenge with Ponseti method for clubfoot: our experience. Acta Biomed. 2019; 90(12-S): 127?30.

  10. Eamsobhana P, Kongwachirapaitoon P, Kaewpornsawan K. Evertor muscle activity as a predictor for recurrence in idiopathic clubfoot. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. 2017; 27(7): 1005?9.

  11. Thompson GH, Hoyen HA, Barthel T. Tibialis anterior tendon transfer after clubfoot surgery. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2009; 467(5): 1306?13.

  12. Ponseti IV, Smoley EN. The classic: congenital club foot: the results of treatment. 1963. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2009; 467(5): 1133?45.

  13. Porecha MM, Parmar DS, Chavda HR. Mid-term results of Ponseti method for the treatment of congenital idiopathic clubfoot--(a study of 67 clubfeet with mean five year follow-up). J Orthop Surg Res. 2011; 6: 3.

  14. Ware JE Jr, Sherbourne CD. The MOS 36-item short-form health survey (SF-36). I. Conceptual framework and item selection. Med Care. 1992; 30(6): 473-83.

  15. Madariaga IA, Núñez AV. Aspectos estadísticos del cuestionario de calidad de vida relacionada con salud short form-36 (SF-36). Estadística Española. 2008; 50 (167): 147-92.

  16. Fuentes A, López-Oliva F, Forriol F. Valoración funcional y de calidad de vida en pacientes tratados con artrodesis de tobillo. Trauma (Spain). 2010; 21(2): 102-10.

  17. Alonso J, Prieto L, Anto JM. La versión española del SF-36 Health Survey (Cuestionario de Salud SF-36): un instrumento para la medida de los resultados clínicos. Med Clin (Barc). 1995; 104: 771-6.

  18. Alonso J, Regidor E, Barrio G, Prieto L, Rodríguez C, De La Fuente De Hoz L. Valores poblacionales de referencia de la versión española del Cuestionario de Salud SF-36. Med Clin (Barc). 1998; 111: 410-6.

  19. Pavot W, Diener E. Review of the satisfaction with life scale. Psychological Assessment. 1993; 5(2): 164-72.

  20. Diener E, Emmons RA, Larsen RJ, Griffin S. The satisfaction with life scale. J Pers Assess. 1985; 49(1): 71-5.

  21. Veenhoven R. El estudio de la satisfacción con la vida. Intervención Psicosocial. 1994; 3(9): 87-116.

  22. Videra GA, Reigal GR. Autoconcepto físico, percepción de salud y satisfacción vital en una muestra de adolescentes. Anal Psicol. 2013. 29 (1): 141-7.

  23. Atienza FL, Pons D, Balaguer I, García-Merita M. Propiedades psicométricas de la escala de satisfacción con la vida en adolescentes. Psicothema. 2000; 12(2): 314-9.

  24. Goñi A, Ruiz de Azúa S, Rodríguez A. Cuestionario de Autoconcepto Físico: CAF. Manual. España: EOS. 2006.

  25. Chueire AJ, Carvalho FG, Kobayashi OY, Carrenho L. Treatment of congenital clubfoot using Ponseti method. Rev Bras Ortop. 2016; 51(3): 313-8.

  26. Rosselli-Cock P, Suárez JA, Rodríguez S. Resultados del tratamiento de pie equinovaro congénito con el método de Ponseti. Rev Colomb Ortop Traumatol. 2018; 32(2): 134-140.

  27. Smith PA, Kuo KN, Graf AN, Krzak J, Flanagan A, Hassani S, et al. Long-term results of comprehensive clubfoot release versus the Ponseti method: which is better? Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2014; 472(4): 1281-90.

  28. Dobbs MB, Nunley R, Schoenecker PL. Long-term follow-up of patients with clubfeet treated with extensive soft-tissue release. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2006; 88(5): 986-96.

  29. Moral Benítez H. Estudio de la calidad de vida del adolescente con pie equinovaro congénito tratado con el Método Ponseti [Internet]. Universitat de Barcelona. 2019 [cited 2019 Jun 11]. p. 1-30. Disponible en: http://hdl.handle.net/2445/136998

  30. Rodríguez FA, Goñi A, Ruiz AS. Physical self-concept and lifestyles in adolescence. Psychosocial Intervention. 2006; 15(1): 81-94.



EVIDENCE LEVEL

IV




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com