Firouz F, Vafaee F, Izadi A, Farhadian M, Rajabi H, Niaghiha F

Language: English
References: 35
Page: 62-70
PDF size: 295.08 Kb.

ABSTRACT

The color stability of temporary restoration is crucial, especially in sensitive areas in terms of aesthetics. This research aimed to determine the effect of temporary cement on the color of temporary crowns made by conventional pressing methods (indirect) and CAM/CAD technologies using milling machines and 3D printers. This study was carried out in a laboratory, utilizing A2 color in all manufacturing methods. The color of the restorations was measured by a spectrophotometer after cementation with semi-permanent resin cement. Subsequently, color changes of the samples (ranging from 0 to 100) were calculated using the Commission International de l'Eclairage (CIE) Lab system. Data analysis was based on descriptive statistics methods and statistical tests, including one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) and Tukey's post hoc test. According to the results of ANOVA, there was a significant difference between the three groups in terms of the 'a' and 'b' indexes (P‹0.001). However, regarding the 'l' index, no significant difference was observed among the three groups (P=0.250). Also, based on Tukey's post hoc test, a significant relationship was seen between the first and second pairs in the 3D printer group, and between the first and third pairs in the milling group (P‹0.001). However, no significant difference was observed in the conventional pressing group. The results showed that the 3D printing method exhibited the highest amount of color change among the three methods, while the milling method demonstrated the lowest amount of change.

REFERENCES

1. Lawaf S., Azizi A., Sabzevari H. Comparison of Dimensional Changes and Water Absorption of Three Acrylic Resins Used for Provisional Fixed Restorations. Journal of Dentistry, 2009; 10 (4): 286-292.

2. Kerby R.E., Knobloch L.A., Sharples S., Peregrina A. Mechanical properties of urethane and bis-acryl interim resin materials. The Journal of prosthetic dentistry. 2013; 110 (1): 21-8.

3. Cakan U., Kara H.B. Effect of liquid polishing materials on the stainability of bis-acryl interim restorative material in vitro. J Prosthet Dent2015; 113 (5): 475-9.

4. Van Noort R. The future of dental devices is digital. Dental materials. 2012; 28 (1): 3-12.

5. Bajoghli F., Fathi A., Ebadian B., Jowkar M., Sabouhi M. The effect of different methods of cleansing temporary cement (with and without eugenol) on the final bond strength of implant-supported zirconia copings after final cementation: An in vitro study. Dent Res J 2023; 20: 22.

6. Rosenstiel S.F., Land M.F., Walter R. Contemporary fixed prosthodontics-e-book: Elsevier Health Sciences; 2022.

7. Hernandez E., Oshida Y., Platt J., Andres C., Barco M., Brown D. Mechanical properties of four methylmethacrylate-based resins for provisional fixed restorations. Biomed Mater Eng. 2004;14 (1):107-22.

8. Vandenberghe B. The digital patient-Imaging science in dentistry. J Dent. 2018 Jul; 74 Suppl 1: S21-S26.

9. Park J.-M., Hong Y.-S., Park E.-J., Heo S.-J., Oh N. Clinical evaluations of cast gold alloy, machinable zirconia, and semiprecious alloy crowns: A multicenter study. J Prosthet Dent. 2016; 115 (6): 684-91.

10. Stansbury J.W., Idacavage M.J. 3D printing with polymers: Challenges among expanding options and opportunities. Dent Mater. 2016; 32 (1): 54-64.

11. Singh V. Rapid prototyping, materials for RP and applications of RP. Int J Eng Res Sci. 2013; 4 (7): 473-80.

12. Shayegh S.S., Hakimaneh S.M.R., Derakhshi H. Three-Dimensional Printers and Their Application in Dental Prostheses. Journal of Mashhad Dental School. 2022; 46 (2): 112-34.

13. Shamseddine L., Mortada R., Rifai K., Chidiac J.J. Marginal and internal fit of pressed ceramic crowns made from conventional and computer-aided design and computer-aided manufacturing wax patterns: An in vitro comparison. The Journal of prosthetic dentistry. 2016; 116 (2): 242-8.

14. Koch G.K., Gallucci G.O., Lee S.J. Accuracy in the digital workflow: From data acquisition to the digitally milled cast. J Prosthet Dent. 2016; 115 (6): 749-54.

15. Hull C.W. Apparatus for production of three-dimensional objects by stereolithography. United States Patent, Appl, No 638905, Filed. 1984.

16. Ngo T.D., Kashani A., Imbalzano G., Nguyen K.T., Hui D. Additive manufacturing (3D printing): A review of materials, methods, applications and challenges. Composites Part B: Engineering. 2018;143:172-96.

17. Barghi N., Simmons Jr E.W. The marginal integrity of the temporary acrylic resin crown. J Prosthet Dent. 1976; 36 (3): 274-7.

18. Yildirim B., Recen D., Tekeli Simsek A. Effect of cement color and tooth-shaded background on the final color of lithium disilicate andzirconia-reinforced lithium silicate ceramics:An in vitro study. J Esthet Restor Dent. 2021;33 (2): 380-6.

19. Tabatabaian F., Khodaei M.H., Namdari M.,Mahshid M. Effect of cement type on thecolor attributes of a zirconia ceramic. J AdvProsthodont. 2016; 8 (6): 449-56.

20. Shillingburg H.T. Fundamentals of FixedProsthodontics 4th edition Quintessence PubCo March 30, 2012.

21. Mai H.N., Lee K.B., Lee D.H. Fit of interimcrowns fabricated using photopolymerjetting3D printing. J Prosthet Dent. 2017Aug; 118 (2): 208-15.

22. Powers J.M., Wataha J.C., Chen Y.W., CraigR.G. Dental materials: foundations and applications,Elsevier Inc. 2017.

23. Rayyan M.M., Aboushelib M., Sayed N.M.,Ibrahim A., Jimbo R. Comparison of interimrestorations fabricated by CAD/CAM withthose fabricated manually. J Prosthet Dent.2015; 114 (3): 414-9.

24. Perry R.D., Magnuson B. Provisionalmaterials: key components of interim fixedrestorations. Compend Contin Educ Dent.2012 Jan; 33 (1): 59-60, 62. PMID: 22432178.

25. Regish K.M., Sharma D., Prithviraj D.R.Techniques of fabrication of provisionalrestoration: an overview. Int J Dent. 2011;2011: 134659. doi: 10.1155/2011/134659.Epub 2011 Oct 12. PMID: 22013441;PMCID: PMC3195530.

26. Alharbi N., Osman R., Wismeijer D. Effectsof build direction on the mechanical propertiesof 3D-printed complete coverage interimdental restorations. J Prosthet Dent. 2016;115 (6): 760-7.

27. Tin-Oo M.M., Saddki N., Hassan, N. Factorsinfluencing patient satisfaction with dentalappearance and treatments they desire toimprove aesthetics. BMC Oral Health. 2011;11 (6). https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6831-11-6

28. Pohjola R.M., Hackman S.T., BrowningW.D. Evaluation of a standard shade guidefor color change after disinfection. QuintessenceInt. 2007; 38 (8): 671-6. PMID:17823685.

29. Alamri M.D. The effect of disinfectingsolutions on the color of porcelain shadeguides. Egypt Dent J. 2008; 54 (2): 1057-66.

30. Harsono M., Simon J.F., Stein J.M., Kugel G.Evolution of chairside CAD/CAM dentistry.Tex Dent J. 2013; 130 (3): 238-44. PMID:23734548.

31. Lee W.-S., Lee D.-H., Lee K.-B. Evaluationof internal fit of interim crown fabricated withCAD/CAM milling and 3D printing system.J Adv Prosthodont. 2017; 9 (4): 265-70.

32. Mai H.-N., Lee K.-B., Lee D.-H. Fit ofinterim crowns fabricated using photopolymer-jetting 3D printing. J Prosthet Dent.2017; 118 (2): 208-15.

33. Digholkar S., Madhav V., Palaskar J. Evaluationof the flexural strength and microhardnessof provisional crown and bridgematerials fabricated by different methods. JIndian Prosthodont Soc. 2016; 16 (4): 328.

34. Dede D.Ö., Sahin O., Özdemir O.S., YilmazB., Celik E., Köroğlu A. Influence of the colorof composite resin foundation and lutingcement on the final color of lithium disilicateceramic systems. J Prosthet Dent. 2017; 117(1): 138-43.

35. Malkondu O., Tinastepe N., Kazazoglu E.Influence of type of cement on the colorand translucency of monolithic zirconia. JProsthet Dent. 2016; 116 (6): 902-8.