2024, Number 1
<< Back Next >>
Acta de Otorrinolaringología CCC 2024; 52 (1)
Sialendoscopy: the end of the open adenectomy in benign salivary disease
Marulanda M, Olivera MP, Hurtado M, Sanabria Á
Language: Spanish
References: 12
Page: 48-54
PDF size: 413.89 Kb.
ABSTRACT
Introduction: Chronic sialoadenitis is caused by stones, mucus deposits, ductal
stenosis, or chronic inflammation, and mainly affects the submandibular gland. Initially,
medical management is indicated; in recurrent cases, adenectomy or removal
of the stone are of choice. The morbidity associated with adenectomy due to facial
nerve injury, external scarring, persistence of symptoms, and longer recovery time
have led to the search for more functional options that respect the physiology of
the gland.
Methods: A retrospective series of patients with benign salivary disease,
adults over 18 years of age treated with sialoendsocopy as the first option. Patients
with stones ›1 cm were excluded.
Results: Sialoendoscopy in 44 patients with nononcological
pathology for 5 years was presented, of which 75% were women and
the majority affected the submandibular glands. The main cause was lithiasis, with
an average size of 10 mm. 78% were treated by a pure endoscopic approach with
papillotomy to insert the equipment. In 3 the duct could not be found and 3 required
open sialadenectomy. 76% remained asymptomatic after the procedure; infectious
complications in 2. The median surgical time was 75 minutes and the follow-up was
45 days.
Discussion: Compared to studies available in the literature, there were more
women, the gland most affected was parotid and the success rate was higher compared
to Katz’s article; but when compared with others it was standard, and lower
complication rates were reported compared to the other studies cited
Conclusion:
sialendoscopy is a viable and safe treatment for benign salivary disease.
REFERENCES
Soto Dávila C. Efectividad y seguridad de la Sialoendoscopiaen el tratamiento de la Parotiditis Juvenil Recurrente en niños[Internet] [Tesis]. Bogotá: Universidad Nacional de Colombia; 2015. Disponible en: https://repositorio.unal.edu.co/handle/unal/55768
Chandra SR. Sialoendoscopy: Review and Nuances ofTechnique. J Maxillofac Oral Surg. 2019;18(1):1-10. doi:10.1007/s12663-018-1141-0
Lorusso F, Immordino A, Dispenza F, et al. A conservativetreatment for chronic obstructive sialoadenitis by intraductalinstillation of mucolytic, steroids and antibiotic solution. EurArch Otorhinolaryngol. 2022;279(1):501-6. doi: 10.1007/s00405-021-06930-2
Araújo RV, Milani BA, Martins IS, et al. An extraoral surgicalapproach to treat chronic submandibular sialolithiasis - A caseseries. Annals of Maxillofacial Surgery. 2020;10(2):537–42.doi: 10.4103/ams.ams_102_20
Lustmann J, Regev E, Melamed Y. Sialolithiasis. A survey on245 patients and a review of the literature. Int J Oral MaxillofacSurg. 1990;19(3):135-8. doi: 10.1016/s0901-5027(05)80127-4
Gallo A, Benazzo M, Capaccio P, et al. Sialoendoscopy:state of the art, challenges and further perspectives. RoundTable, 101(st) SIO National Congress, Catania 2014. ActaOtorhinolaryngol Ital. 2015;35(4):217-33.
Marchal F, Chossegros C, Faure F, et al. Salivary stonesand stenosis. A comprehensive classification. Rev StomatolChir Maxillofac. 2008;109(4):233-6. doi: 10.1016/j.stomax.2008.07.004
Bannikova KA, Bosykh YY, Gaitova VG, et al. Indications forthe Use of Sialoendoscopy in Sialolithiasis. Sovrem TekhnologiiMed. 2021;12(3):41-5. doi: 10.17691/stm2020.12.3.05
Zenk J, Koch M, Klintworth N, et al. Sialendoscopy in thediagnosis and treatment of sialolithiasis: a study on more than
1000 patients. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2012;147(5):858-63. doi: 10.1177/019459981245283710. McGurk M, Escudier MP, Brown JE. Modern management ofsalivary calculi. Br J Surg. 2005;92(1):107-12. doi: 10.1002/bjs.4789
Chang JL, Eisele DW. Limited distal sialodochotomy to facilitatesialendoscopy of the submandibular duct. Laryngoscope.2013;123(5):1163-7. doi: 10.1002/lary.23801
Strychowsky JE, Sommer DD, Gupta MK, et al. Sialendoscopyfor the management of obstructive salivary gland disease: asystematic review and meta-analysis. Arch Otolaryngol HeadNeck Surg. 2012;138(6):541-7. doi: 10.1001/archoto.2012.856