medigraphic.com
ISSN 2539-0859 (Electronic)
ISSN 0120-8411 (Print)
Asociación Colombiana de Otorrinolaringología y Cirugía de Cabeza y cuello, Maxilofacial y Estética Facial (ACORL)

2024, Number 1

Next >>

Acta de Otorrinolaringología CCC 2024; 52 (1)

Clinical-epidemiological characterization of orbital fractures at hospital de San José, Bogotá 2015-2020

Pinzón-Navarro M, Parra-Corvacho JC, Hernández-Rodríguez AV, Díaz MC, Moncada IF, Borja JC

Language: Spanish
References: 27
Page: 27-34
PDF size: 191.67 Kb.


ABSTRACT

Introduction: Maxillofacial trauma represents a health problem; it can cause functional and aesthetic alterations and sequelae. Orbital trauma is common. There are social demographic variables that could be associated with orbital fractures. The objective of this work was to describe the social, economic, environmental, epidemiological, medical, and surgical factors and their postoperative results of patients with orbital trauma in the patient population of the San José hospital in the period between 2015 and 2020. Methodology: Descriptive study observational case series. Data collection was carried out on patients with a diagnosis of orbital fracture at the San José Hospital between 2015 and 2020. Sociodemographic and clinical-surgical variables are described. Results: 120 patients with orbital fractures in 5 years were included. 81.67% were male, with an average age of 35.6 years. The most common stratum was 3, and the incidence was higher in the months with more holidays. The most frequent mechanism of trauma: falls (20.83%), followed by fights (19.17%). Impure fractures were the most frequent and of these, the orbitozygomatic fracture was the most common. Surgical treatment was the choice in most cases and the most common surgical approach was the subciliary (54.17%). Conclusion: Orbital fractures are frequent in men and generally involve the malar complex, despite the time the cases have increased and there is a possible relationship with the months with more festivities and secondary to violent etiologies. The most used treatment is surgical.


REFERENCES

  1. Mardones MM, Fernández MÁ, Bravo R, Pedemonte C, UlloaC. Traumatología máxilo facial: diagnóstico y tratamiento.Rev. méd. Clín. Las Condes. 2011;22(5):607-16. doi: 10.1016/S0716-8640(11)70472-2

  2. Povolotskiy R, Youssef P, Kaye R, et al. Facial Fracturesin Young Adults: A National Retrospective Study.Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 2019;128(6):516-23. doi:10.1177/0003489419830114

  3. Ramponi DR, Astorino T, Bessetti-Barrett CR. Orbital FloorFractures. Adv Emerg Nurs J. 2017;39(4):240-7. doi: 10.1097/TME.0000000000000163

  4. Antonio C, Gustavo E. Epidemiology and management oforbital fractures. Curr Opin Ophthalmol. 2004;15(5):416-21.doi: 10.1097/01.icu.0000136113.56288.87

  5. Cantini J, Prada J. Cirugía Craneofacial. Bogotá: FundaciónUniversitaria de Ciencias de la Salud (FUCS); 1992.

  6. Chukwulebe S, Hogrefe C. The Diagnosis and Managementof Facial Bone Fractures. Emerg Med Clin North Am.2019;37(1):137-51. doi: 10.1016/j.emc.2018.09.012

  7. Mark P, Whitney P, Mitchell R, et al. Resident Manual ofTrauma to the Face, Head, and Neck the American Academy ofOtolaryngology—Head and Neck Surgery Foundation; 2012.

  8. Higgins SS, Pedraza Alarcón R, Pinzón Navarro M. Manejoquirúrgico de las fracturas orbitarias: Hospital de San José.1997-2002. Repert. Med. Cir. 2003;12(3):128-33. doi:10.31260/RepertMedCir.v12.n3.2003.327

  9. Joseph JM, Glavas IP. Orbital fractures: a review. ClinOphthalmol. 2011;5:95-100. doi: 10.2147/OPTH.S14972

  10. Felding UNA. Blowout fractures - clinic, imaging and appliedanatomy of the orbit. Dan Med J. 2018;65(3):B5459.

  11. Bell B, Markiewicz M, Gelesko S. Management ofComplications in Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery. 1.a edición.UK: John Wiley & Sons; 2013.

  12. Righi S, Boffano P, Guglielmi V, et al. Diagnosis and imagingof orbital roof fractures: a review of the current literature. OralMaxillofac Surg. 2015;19(1):1-4. doi: 10.1007/s10006-015-0482-9

  13. Converse JM, Smith B, Obear MF, et al. Orbital blowoutfractures: a ten-year survey. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1967;39(1):20-36. doi: 10.1097/00006534-196701000-00002

  14. Catherine Z, Courvoisier DS, Scolozzi P. Is the pure and impuredistinction of orbital fractures clinically relevant with respectto ocular and periocular injuries? A retrospective study of 473patients. J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 2019;47(12):1935-42. doi:10.1016/j.jcms.2019.10.001

  15. Boswell KA. Management of facial fractures. Emerg Med ClinNorth Am. 2013;31(2):539-51. doi: 10.1016/j.emc.2013.01.001

  16. Strong EB. Orbital fractures: pathophysiology and implantmaterials for orbital reconstruction. Facial Plast Surg.2014;30(5):509-17. doi: 10.1055/s-0034-1394099

  17. Banica B, Ene P, Dabu A, et al. Rationale for management offrontal sinus fractures. Maedica (Buchar). 2013;8(4):398-403.

  18. Polacco MA, Kahng PW, Sudoko CK, Gosselin BJ, et al. OrbitalFloor Reconstruction: A Comparison of Outcomes betweenAbsorbable and Permanent Implant Systems. CraniomaxillofacTrauma Reconstr. 2019;12(3):193-8. doi: 10.1055/s-0038-1651514

  19. Kholaki O, Hammer DA, Schlieve T. Management of OrbitalFractures. Atlas Oral Maxillofac Surg Clin North Am.

  20. 2019;27(2):157-65. doi: 10.1016/j.cxom.2019.05.00720. Oróstegui Restrepo O. Preocupa crecimiento de parqueautomotor en Bogotá [Internet]. Bogotá Cómo Vamos; 23 demayo de 2019. Disponible en: https://bogotacomovamos.org/preocupa-crecimiento-de-parque-automotor/2019

  21. Oróstegui Restrepo O. Bogotá, ¡agresiva! [Internet]. BogotáCómo Vamos; 3 de julio de 2019. Disponible en: https://bogotacomovamos.org/bogota-agresiva/2019

  22. Bastidas Castillo DA, Ortiz Orrego GE. Prevalencia de fracturasmaxilofaciales en pacientes atendidos en el hospital generalde Medellín: una revisión retrospectiva de 5 años [Internet][Tesis]. Medellín: Universidad CES; 2012. Disponible en:https://repository.ces.edu.co/handle/10946/952

  23. Carrioni C. Caracterización del trauma maxilofacial enel Hospital La Samaritana de Bogotá entre los años 2008a 2013 [Internet] [Tesis]. Bogotá: Universidad Nacionalde Colombia; 2016. Disponible en: https://repositorio.unal.edu.co/bitstream/handle/unal/55386/9099455.2015.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y

  24. Pérez-Flores I, Santos-Armentia E, Fernández-Sanromán J, etal. Diplopia secondary to orbital fracture in adults. Arch Soc EspOftalmol. 2018;93(4):174-81. doi: 10.1016/j.oftal.2017.07.011

  25. Rhim CH, Scholz T, Salibian A, et al. Orbital floor fractures: aretrospective review of 45 cases at a tertiary health care center.Craniomaxillofac Trauma Reconstr. 2010;3(1):41-7. doi:10.1055/s-0030-1249374

  26. Boyette JR, Pemberton JD, Bonilla-Velez J. Management oforbital fractures: challenges and solutions. Clin Ophthalmol.2015;9:2127-37. doi: 10.2147/OPTH.S80463

  27. Hawes MJ, Dortzbach RK. Surgery on orbital floor fractures.Influence of time of repair and fracture size. Ophthalmology.1983;90(9):1066-70. doi: 10.1016/s0161-6420(83)80049-9




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com