Delgado CJA, Badillo RIJ, Bravo LDG, Melgoza OLG

Language: Spanish
References: 27
Page: 605-609
PDF size: 246.70 Kb.

ABSTRACT

Invasive mechanical ventilation in adult patients is a therapeutic tool for patients with acute respiratory failure; it can also cause complications such as direct lung damage secondary to inadequate programming of ventilatory parameters, causing ventilator-induced lung injury or VILI, which has the potential to increase morbidity and mortality. For this reason, lung protective ventilation strategies have been investigated to improve the safety of mechanical ventilation, resulting in a comprehensive concept that unites the causes of VILI in a single variable known as mechanical power, which represents the total energy applied to the respiratory system. for each respiratory cycle, so its measurement at the bedside of the critically ill patient as a quantitative tool could help predict VILI and support lung protective ventilation with a decrease in morbidity and mortality.

REFERENCES

1. Fothergill J. Observations on a case published in the last volume of the medical essays, &c. of recovering a man dead in appearance, by distending the lungs with air. Edinburgh: Philosophical Transactions; 1774.

2. Avignon PD, Hedenstrom G, Hedman C. Pulmonary complications in respirator patients. Acta Med Scand Suppl. 1956;316:86-90.

3. Respirator lung syndrome. Minn Med. 1967;50(11):1693-1705.

4. Slutsky AS. Lung injury caused by mechanical ventilation. Chest. 1999;116(1 Suppl):9S-15S.

5. Katira BH. Ventilator-induced lung injury: classic and novel concepts. Respir Care. 2019;64(6):629-637.

6. Gattinoni L, Tonetti T, Cressoni M, Cadringher P, Herrmann P, Moerer O, et al. Ventilator-related causes of lung injury: the mechanical power. Intensive Care Med. 2016;42(10):1567-1575.

7. Marini JJ, Jaber S. Dynamic predictors of VILI risk: beyond the driving pressure. Intensive Care Med. 2016;42(10):1597-1600.

8. Eworuke E, Major JM, Gilbert McClain LI. National incidence rates for Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome (ARDS) and ARDS cause-specific factors in the United States (2006-2014). J Crit Care. 2018;47:192-197.

9. Marín MC, Elizalde J, Villagómez A, Cerón U, Poblano M, Palma-Lara I, et al. ¿Se han producido cambios en la aplicación de la ventilación mecánica en relación con la evidencia científica? Estudio multicéntrico en México. Med Intensiva. 2020:44(6):333-343.

10. Slutsky AS, Ranieri VM. Ventilator-induced lung injury. N Engl J Med. 2013;369(22):2126-2136.

11. Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome Network; Brower RG, Matthay MA, Morris A, Schoenfeld D, Thompson BT, et al. Ventilation with lower tidal volumes as compared with traditional tidal volumes for acute lung injury and the acute respiratory distress syndrome. N Engl J Med. 2000;342(18):1301-1308.

12. Gattinoni L, Carlesso E, Caironi P. Stress and strain within the lung. Curr Opinion Crit Care. 2012;18(1):42-47.

13. Beitler JR, Sarge T, Banner-Goodspeed VM, Gong MN, Cook D, Novack V, et al. Effect of titrating positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) with an esophageal pressure-guided strategy vs an empirical high PEEP-Fio2 strategy on death and days free from mechanical ventilation among patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA. 2019;321(9):846-857.

14. Aoyama H, Yamada Y, Fan E. The future of driving pressure: a primary goal for mechanical ventilation? J Intensive Care. 2018;6:64.

15. Amato MB, Meade MO, Slutsky AS, Brochard L, Costa EL, Schoenfeld DA, et al. Driving pressure and survival in the acute respiratory distress syndrome. N Engl J Med. 2015;372(8):747-755.

16. Serpa Neto A, Amato MBP, Schultz MJ. Dissipated energy is a key mediator of VILI: rationale for using low driving pressures. In: Vincent JL (ed). Annual update in intensive care and emergency medicine. Cham, Springer; 2016. pp. 311-321.

17. Serpa Neto A, Cardoso SO, Manetta JA, Pereira VG, Espósito DC, Pasqualucci Mde O, et al. Association between use of lung-protective ventilation with lower tidal volumes and clinical outcomes among patients without acute respiratory distress syndrome a meta-analysis. JAMA. 2012;308:1651-1659.

18. Cressoni M, Gotti M, Chiurazzi C, Massari D, Algieri I, Amini M, et al. Mechanical power and development of ventilator-induced lung injury. Anesthesiology. 2016;124(5):1100-1108.

19. Becher T, van der Staay M, Schadler D, Frerichs I, Weiler N. Calculation of mechanical power for pressure-controlled ventilation. Intensive Care Med. 2019;45(9):1321-1323.

20. Mancebo J, Isabey D, Lorino H, Lofaso F, Lemaire F, Brochard L. Comparative effects of pressure support ventilation and intermittent positive pressure breathing (IPPB) in non-intubated healthy subjects. Eur Respir J. 1995;8(11):1901-1909.

21. Silva PL, Ball L, Rocco PRM, Pelosi P. Power to mechanical power to minimize ventilator-induced lung injury? Intensive Care Med Exp. 2019;7(Suppl 1):38.

22. Coppola S, Caccioppola A, Froio S, Formenti P, De Giorgis V, Galanti V, et al. Effect of mechanical power on intensive care mortality in ARDS patients. Crit Care. 2020;24(1):246.

23. Giosa L, Busana M, Pasticci I, Bonifazi M, Macri MM, Romitti F, et al. Mechanical power at a glance: a simple surrogate for volume-controlled ventilation. Intensive Care Med Exp. 2019;7(1):61.

24. Rietveld PJ, Snoep JWM, Lamping M, van der Velde F, de Jonge E, van Westerloo DW, et al. Mechanical power differs between pressure-controlled ventilation and different volume-controlled ventilation modes. Crit Care Explor. 2022;4(8):e0741.

25. van der Meijden S, Molenaar M, Somhorst P, et al. Calculating mechanical power for pressure-controlled ventilation. Intensive Care Med. 2019;45:1495-1497.

26. Marini JJ, Rocco PRM. Which component of mechanical power is most important in causing VILI? Crit Care. 2020;24(1):39.

27. Serpa Neto A, Deliberato RO, Johnson AEW, Bos LD, Amorim P, Pereira SM, et al. Mechanical power of ventilation is associated with mortality in critically ill patients: an analysis of patients in two observational cohorts. Intensive Care Med. 2018;44(11):1914-1922.