2023, Number 7
Ventilatory ratio as a predictor index of failure to withdrawal of invasive mechanical ventilation in the critically ill patient
Language: Spanish
References: 23
Page: 525-533
PDF size: 327.43 Kb.
ABSTRACT
Introduction: weaning from invasive mechanical ventilation (IMV) is an essential element in the treatment of the critical patient. Despite this, the incidence of IMV weaning failure is not negligible, even with good predictors of success. The ventilatory ratio (VR) has been described as a bedside tool to evaluate the patient's ventilatory deterioration. Its value reflects the capacity of the lungs to eliminate carbon dioxide (CO2). In several studies, a high VR has been described as an independent predictor of mortality in patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS); however, there are no studies that support its use as a tool to determine the probability of IMV weaning failure. Objective: to evaluate the use of VR to predict IMV weaning failure in critically ill patients.Material and methods: retrospective cohort, in patients in the intensive care unit (ICU) of the ABC Medical Center from January 2021 to August 2023. Patients with IMV in a ventilatory weaning protocol were evaluated. The VR was calculated with the formula VR = measured VE × measured PaCO2 / predicted VE x ideal PaCO2. A ROC curve and area under the curve analysis were performed to determine the best predictive performance of VR for IMV weaning failure. The cut-off points of 1, 1.2, 1.4, 1.6 were established and sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV) and negative predictive value (NPV) were calculated for each one. Likewise, the regression coefficient was estimated for each cut-off point through logistic regression models. For all determinations, the 95% confidence interval was estimated and a p value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Results: the cut-off point with the best performance to predict extubation failure was a VR > 1.4 with sensitivity 82.6%, specificity 56.4%, PPV 52.8% and NPV 84.6%. Likewise, the VR was positively involved in the mortality of patients in the ICU. In this regard, the best cut-off point was VR > 1.6 with sensitivity 72.7%, specificity 76.5%, PPV 40.0% and NPV 92.9%. Conclusions: VR > 1.4 is a new tool to predict failure to withdraw from IMV.REFERENCES
Vallverdú I, Calaf N, Subirana M, Net A, Benito S, Mancebo J. Clinical characteristics, respiratory functional parameters, and outcome of a two-hour T-piece trial in patients weaning from mechanical ventilation. Am J Respir Crit Care Med [Internet]. 1998;158(6):1855-1862. Available in: http://dx.doi.org/10.1164/ajrccm.158.6.9712135
J Raurich JM, Vilar M, Colomar A, Ibáñez J, Ayestarán I, Pérez-Bárcena J, et al. Prognostic value of the pulmonary dead-space fraction during the early and intermediate phases of acute respiratory distress syndrome. Respir Care [Internet]. 2010;55(3):282-287. Available in: http://rc.rcjournal.com/content/55/3/282.abstract
George Aguilar F, González Carmona BG, Bernal Ríos N, Torres Aguilar O, Monares Zepeda E, Aguirre Sánchez J, et al. Factores pronósticos en pacientes con insuficiencia respiratoria aguda con base en potencial de reclutamiento alveolar. Rev Asoc Mex Med Crit y Ter Int [Internet]. 2015;29(1):22-26. Disponible en: https://www.scielo.org.mx/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0187-84332015000100004
Sinha P, Singh S, Hardman JG, Bersten AD, Soni N. Evaluation of the physiological properties of ventilatory ratio in a computational cardiopulmonary model and its clinical application in an acute respiratory distress syndrome population. Br J Anaesth [Internet]. 2014;112(1):96-101. Available in: http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/bja/aet283
Sinha P, Sanders RD, Soni N, Vukoja MK, Gajic O. Acute respiratory distress syndrome: The prognostic value of ventilatory ratio—A simple bedside tool to monitor ventilatory efficiency. Am J Respir Crit Care Med [Internet]. 2013;187(10):1150-1153. Available in: http://dx.doi.org/10.1164/rccm.201211-2037le
Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome Network; Brower RG, Matthay MA, Morris A, Schoenfeld D, Thompson BT, et al. Ventilation with lower tidal volumes as compared with traditional tidal volumes for acute lung injury and the acute respiratory distress syndrome. N Engl J Med [Internet]. 2000;342(18):1301-1308. Available in: http://dx.doi.org/10.1056/nejm200005043421801
Siddiki H, Kojicic M, Li G, Yilmaz M, Thompson TB, Hubmayr RD, et al. Bedside quantification of dead-space fraction using routine clinical data in patients with acute lung injury: secondary analysis of two prospective trials. Crit Care [Internet]. 2010;14(4):R141. Available in: http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/cc9206