Martínez TAG, Ugalde HE, Ramos TJ, Domínguez GRC

Language: Spanish
References: 18
Page: 11-16
PDF size: 187.84 Kb.

ABSTRACT

Introduction: the increase in population age is associated with a higher incidence and prevalence of geriatric syndromes, among which frailty syndrome stands out, and consequently, an increased risk of hip fracture. Calcar replacement and Thompson hemiprosthesis (TH) placement is a therapeutic approach that has proven to be safe and effective. Objective: to analyze functionality in patients undergoing trochanteroplasty with Thompson hemiprosthesis placement in transtrochanteric hip fractures. Material and methods: a prospective, observational, longitudinal and single-center study was carried out, where the functional evolution of patients undergoing Thompson hemiprosthesis placement was compared. Results: 27 patients were recruited who presented improvement in perceived pain at each follow-up visit (p = 0.0025) and a tendency to improve functionality, although the use of orthosis in all cases at 3 months was seen. Conclusion: calcar replacement and Thompson hemiprosthesis placement for transtrochanteric hip fracture is a safe therapeutic option that allows survival with improvement in pain and functionality.

REFERENCES

1. Instituto Nacional de Estadística y Censos. Porcentaje de población de 60 y más años. México: INEGI; 2019. Disponible en: https://www.inegi.org.mx/app/buscador/default.html?q=poblacion+mayo+de+60+años#tabMCcollapse-Indicadores

2. Voeten SC, Krijnen P, Voeten DM, Hegeman JH, Wouters MWJM, Schipper IB. Quality indicators for hip fracture care, a systematic review. Osteoporos Int. 2018; 29 (9): 1963-1985. doi: 10.1007/s00198-018-4558-x.

3. Rommens PM, Hofmann A. Focus on fragility fractures of the pelvis. Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2021; 47 (1): 1-2. doi: 10.1007/s00068-020-01550-7.

4. Wang P, Li Y, Zhuang H, Yu H, Cai S, Xu H et al. Influence of bone densitometry on the anti-osteoporosis treatment after fragility hip fracture. Aging Clin Exp Res. 2019; 31 (10): 1525-1529. doi: 10.1007/s40520-018-1094-7.

5. Veronese N, Maggi S. Epidemiology and social costs of hip fracture. Injury. 2018; 49 (8): 1458-1460. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2018.04.015.

6. Alexiou KI, Roushias A, Varitimidis SE, Malizos KN. Quality of life and psychological consequences in elderly patients after a hip fracture: a review. Clin Interv Aging. 2018; 13: 143-150. doi: 10.2147/CIA.S150067.

7. Bhandari M, Swiontkowski M. Management of acute hip fracture. N Engl J Med. 2017; 377 (21): 2053-2062. doi: 10.1056/NEJMcp1611090.

8. Pech-Ciau BA, Lima-Martínez EA, Espinosa-Cruz GA, Pacho-Aguilar CR, Huchim-Lara O, Alejos-Gómez RA. Fractura de cadera en el adulto mayor: epidemiología y costos de la atención. Acta Ortop Mex. 2021; 35 (4): 341-347.

9. Quevedo I, Ormeño JC, Weissglas B, Opazo C. Epidemiology and direct medical cost of osteoporotic hip fracture in Chile. J Osteoporos. 2020; 2020: 5360467. doi: 10.1155/2020/5360467.

10. Sedlock J, Green J, Diegel-Vacek L. Need and rationale for geriatric fracture programs. Orthop Nurs. 2020; 39 (3): 162-164. doi: 10.1097/NOR.0000000000000662.

11. Neuman MD, Feng R, Carson JL, Gaskins LJ, Dillane D, Sessler DI et al. Spinal anesthesia or general anesthesia for hip surgery in older adults. N Engl J Med. 2021; 385 (22): 2025-2035. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2113514.

12. Loggers SAI, van Lieshout EMM, Joosse P, Verhofstad MHJ, Willems HC. Prognosis of nonoperative treatment in elderly patients with a hip fracture: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Injury. 2020; 51 (11): 2407-2413. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2020.08.027.

13. Behrendt C, Faleiro TB, Schulz Rda S, Silva BO, Paula Filho EQ. Repruducibility of Tronzo and ao/asif classifications for transtrochanteric fractures. Acta Ortop Bras. 2014; 22 (5): 275-277. doi: 10.1590/1413-78522014220500884.

14. Magaziner J, Chiles N, Orwig D. Recovery after hip fracture: interventions and their timing to address deficits and desired outcomes--evidence from the Baltimore hip studies. Nestle Nutr Inst Workshop Ser. 2015; 83: 71-81. doi: 10.1159/000382064.

15. Hersnaes PN, Gromov K, Otte KS, Gebuhr PH, Troelsen A. Harris hip score and SF-36 following metal-on-metal total hip arthroplasty and hip resurfacing - a randomized controlled trial with 5-years follow up including 75 patients. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2021; 22 (1): 781. doi: 10.1186/s12891-021-04671-1.

16. Lau BC, Scribani M, Lassiter T, Wittstein J. Correlation of single assessment numerical evaluation score for sport and activities of daily living to modified Harris hip score and hip outcome score in patients undergoing arthroscopic hip surgery. Am J Sports Med. 2019; 47 (11): 2646-2650. doi: 10.1177/0363546519863411.

17. Manoharan G, Morley D, Chatterton BD, Moores TS, Roberts PJ. Uncemented Thompson's hemiarthroplasty: safe, palliative and cost-effective surgery in the infirm patient-a consecutive series of 1445 cases [published correction appears in Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. 2020 Apr;30(3):553]. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. 2018; 28 (6): 1103-1109. doi: 10.1007/s00590-018-2144-8.

18. Matar HE, Donnelly T, Farrar G. Long-term outcomes of thompson's hip hemiarthroplasties: literature review. J Long Term Eff Med Implants. 2017; 27 (1): 67-69. doi: 10.1615/JLongTermEffMedImplants.2018020251.