2023, Number 3
<< Back Next >>
Rev Med UAS 2023; 13 (3)
Induction of mammary tumors by orthotopic transplantation of 4T1 cells in BALB/c mice of different parental inbred line: pilot study
Loera-Heras Z, Anaya-Ruiz M, Gutiérrez-Saldívar J, Astiazaran-García H
Language: Spanish
References: 29
Page: 250-259
PDF size: 539.33 Kb.
ABSTRACT
Objective. Develop mammary tumors by orthotopic transplantation of 4T1 cells in mice of the same BALB/c strain but a different
parental inbred line.
Materials and methods. An experimental study was carried out. 4T1 cells (5x10
4) were transplanted in the fourth
mammary fat pad of female BALB/c mice from inbred line A (IL-A n=4) and inbred line B (IL-B n=3). The day of transplantation is
called the first day (D0), on days’ post-transplantation D7, D14, D21 and D28 tumor growth was assessed using an electronic caliper.
Statistical design with t student test.
Results. On D28 both inbred develop solid tumors with a volume 1007.9± 335.6 mm
3 and
994.0±330.7 mm
3 no significant differences were observed P ›0.05. The histological grade in both inbred lines was 3 and an increase
in spleen size 291.6±44.3 mm
2 (IL-A) and 282±18.8 mm
2 (IL-B) no significant differences were observed P ›0.05.
Conclusions. Both
inbred lines (A and B) of the BALB/c strain developed solid tumors of similar size, appearance, and histopathology.
REFERENCES
Sung H, Ferlay J, Siegel RL, Laversanne M,Soerjomataram I, Jemal A, et al. Global CancerStatistics 2020 : GLOBOCAN Estimatesof Incidence and Mortality Worldwide for 36Cancers in 185 Countries. CA Cancer J Clin.
2021 2021;0(0):1–41.2. Sanchez YLM, Medrano Guzman R. Epidemiologíadel cáncer de mama [Internet]. [cited2023 Jan 17]. Available from:https://www.gob.mx/imss/articulos/epidemiologia-del-cancer-de-mama-318014
Korinek V. Animal Modeling in Cancer. Genes(Basel). 2020;11(9):1–4.
National Human Genome Research Institute.MOUSE MODEL [Internet]. [cited 2022Apr 23]. Available from: https://www.genome.gov/genetics-glossary/Mouse-Model
Liu C, Wu P, Zhang A, Mao X. Advances inRodent Models for Breast Cancer Formation,Progression, and Therapeutic Testing.Front Oncol. 2021;11(March):1–11.
Park MK, Lee CH, Lee H. Mouse models ofbreast cancer in preclinical research. LabAnim Res. 2018;34(4):160–5.
Potter M. History of the BALB / c Family. In:The BALB/c Mouse. Berlin, Heidelberg.:Springe; 1985. p. 1–5.
Pulaski BA, Ostrand‐Rosenberg S. Mouse4T1 Breast Tumor Model. Curr Protoc Immunol.2000 Oct;39(1):20.2.1-20.2.16.
Manjunath M, Choudhary B. Triple-negativebreast cancer: A run-through of features,classification and current therapies (Review).Oncol Lett. 2021;22(1):1–21.
Miller BE, Roi LD, Howard LM, Miller FR.Quantitative Selectivity of Contact-mediatedIntercellular Communication in a MetastaticMouse Mammary Tumor Line. Cancer Res.1983;43(9):4102–7.
Tao K, Fang M, Alroy J, Sahagian GG. Imagable4T1 model for the study of late stagebreast cancer. BMC cancer. 2008;8(1), 1-19.
Hunter KW. Mouse models of cancer : doesthe strain matter ? Nat Rev Cancer.2012;12(2):144-149.
Reilly KM. The effects of genetic backgroundof mouse models of cancer: friend or foe?Cold Spring Harb Protoc. 2016;2016(3):pdbtop076273.
Nandi S, Bern HA. Relation Between Mammary-Gland Responses to Lactogenic HormoneCombinations and Tumor Susceptibilityin Various Strains of mice. J Natl CancerInstit. 1960;24(4):907–31.
Murphy KL, Grimm SL, Rosen JM. ModelingMammary Cancer in Mice Conference,. In:Meeting report. Bar Harbor, Maine; 1999. p.5–8.
Rivera J, Tessarollo L. Genetic backgroundand the dilemma of translating mouse studiesto humans. Immunity,. 2008;28(1):1–4.
Garber JC, Wayne R, Bielitzki JT, ClaytonLA, Donovan JC, Hendriksen CF, et al. Committeefor the Update of the Guide for theCare and Use of Laboratory Animals. eighth.Washington DC, USA: National Academy ofSciences; 2011.
NOM-062-ZOO-1999. Especificaciones técnicaspara la producción, cuidado y uso delos animales de laboratorio. 1999.
Cárdenas-Sánchez J, Erazo Valle-Solís AA,Arce-Salinas C, Bargalló-Rocha JE, Bautista-Piña V, Cervantes-Sánchez G, et al.Consenso Mexicano sobre diagnóstico y tratamientodel cáncer mamario. Octava revisión.Colima 2019. Gac Mex Oncol.
2019;18(3):141–231.20. Bloom HJG, Richardson WW. Histologicalgrading and prognosis in breast cancer astudy of 1409 cases of which 359 have beenfollowed for 15 years. 1957;
INEGI. Estadísticas a propósito del día mundialcontra el cáncer [Internet]. Availablefrom: https://www.inegi.org.mx/contenidos/saladeprensa/aproposito/2023/EAP_Cancer.pdf
Zeng L, Li W, Chen C. Breast cancer animalmodels and applications. ZoolRes.2020;41(5):477–94.
Arroyo‐Crespo JJ, Armiñán A, CharbonnierD, Deladriere C, Palomino‐Schätzlein M, Lamas‐Domingo R, et al. Characterization oftriple‐negative breast cancer preclinical modelsprovides functional evidence of metastaticprogression. Int J Cancer. 2019Oct;145(8):2267–81.
Xenografts P, Okano M, Oshi M, Butash A,Okano I, Saito K, et al. Orthotopic ImplantationAchieves Better Engraftment and FasterGrowth Than Subcutaneous Implantation inBreast Cancer. J Mammary Gland Biol Neoplasia.2020;27–36.
Zhang Y, Zhang GL, Sun X, Cao KX, Ma C,Nan N, et al. Establishment of a murinebreast tumor model by subcutaneous ororthotopic implantation. Oncol Lett.2018;15(5):6233–40.
Davie SA, Maglione JE, Manner CK, YoungD, Cardiff RD, et al. Effects of FVB / NJ andC57Bl / 6J strain backgrounds on mammarytumor phenotype in inducible nitric oxidesynthase deficient mice. Transgenic Res.2007;193–201.
Aupperlee MD, Drolet AA, Durairaj S, WangW, Schwartz RC, Haslam SZ. Strain-SpecificDifferences in the Mechanisms of Development.Endocrinol. 2009;150(3):1485–94.
duPre’ SA, Hunter KW. Murine mammarycarcinoma 4T1 induces a leukemoid reactionwith splenomegaly: Association with tumorderivedgrowth factors. Exp Mol Pathol.2007;82(1):12–24.
Fitzgibbons PL, Page DL, Weaver D, ThorAD, Allred DC, Clark GM, et al. PrognosticFactors in Breast Cancer College of AmericanPathologists Consensus. Arch. Pathol.Lab. Med. 1999;124(7),966-978.