Narro-Robles J, Ruiz-Ruisánchez A

Language: Spanish
References: 20
Page: 13-20
PDF size: 64.14 Kb.

ABSTRACT

The issue of how medical specialization does not represent a novelty is discussed. The authors also approach the question of how the advantages and shortcomings of medical care provided by both general practitioners and medical specialists have been equally addressed previously by the ancient Greek classics as well as by outstanding Mexican specialists more than 50 years ago. A short review is made of the main current demographic, social, and health-related conditions of Mexico’s society and of the public health system built up in the last 60 years. Some relevant data pertaining to the number of physicians and medical specialists and their distribution Mexico’s 32 states are presented. The paper also includes a short argumentation of views on medical education in Mexico, and sets forth a proposal regarding the professional profile of the general practitioner and its role within Mexico’s health system, as well as the need to enhance and reconsider the role played by general physicians. Authors conclude that within a comprehensive medical assistance model, both general practitioners and medical specialists are required.

REFERENCES

1. Hutchins RM. Editor. Great books of the Western world. Vol 3. Benton W, publisher. Encyclopaedia Britannica. The University of Chicago;1952. p. 113.

2. Herodoto. En The history of Herodotus. Hutchins RM, editor, Benton W, publisher. Encyclopaedia Britannica. The University of Chicago;1952. p. 65.

3. Hipocrates. En Hippocratic writings. On ancient medicine. Hutchins RM, editor. Benton W, publisher. Encyclopaedia Britannica. The University of Chicago;1952. p. 7.

4. Platón. Diálogos. México Editorial Porrúa “Sepan cuantos”. Número 13 A. 2003. p. 108.

5. Chávez I. México en la cultura médica. México El Colegio Nacional. 1947. p. 111-112.

6. Chávez I. Humanismo médico. Conferencias y discursos. Facultad de Medicina, UNAM. México; 2003. p. 8.

7. 2° Informe de Gobierno. Presidencia de la República. México; 2002. p. 15.

8. 2° Informe de Gobierno. Presidencia de la República. México; 2002, p. 23.

9. XII Censo General de Población y Vivienda 2000. INEGI. México; 2001.

10. De la Fuente JR, Tapia-Conyer R, Lezana-Fernández MA. La información en salud. McGraw Hill Interamericana Editores. México; 2002. p. 364.

11. 2° Informe de Gobierno. Presidencia de la República. México; 2002. p. 68.

12. 2° Informe de Gobierno. Presidencia de la República. México; 2002. p. 221.

13. Salud: México 2002. Información para la rendición de cuentas. Secretaría de Salud. México; 2003. p. 202.

14. Narro RJ. La herencia de Flexner. Las ciencias básicas, el hospital, el laboratorio, la comunidad. Gac Méd Méx 2004;140:52-55.

15. Narro RJ, Jaime-Alarid H, Minero H, Ponce de León CMA, Santaella B, Villalvazo E. Medicina general-familiar. Rev Fac Med UNAM 1981;24(3):4-20.

16. Horder JP. Médicos generales y médicos familiares; una nueva relación. Rev Fac Med UNAM 1979;22(2):16-20.

17. Mc Whinney JR. General practice as an academic discipline. Lancet 1966;1(7434):419-423.

18. Sotelo J. El médico general, actor imprescindible de la medicina del futuro (Conferencia “Ignacio Chávez”). México: Academia Nacional de Medicina; febrero 2004.

19. Comité Normativo Nacional de Consejos de Especialidades Médicas. Disponible en www.anmm.org.mx

20. Espinoza de los Reyes-Sánchez VM. La Academia Nacional de Medicina de México y la certificación de especialistas por los consejos de especialidades médicas. Facultad de Medicina, UNAM. México. En prensa, 2004.