medigraphic.com
ISSN 2992-8036 (Electronic)
ISSN 2306-4102 (Print)
Órgano Oficial del Colegio Mexicano de Ortopedia y Traumatología

2023, Number 3

<< Back Next >>

Acta Ortop Mex 2023; 37 (3)

Unicompartmental knee prosthesis

Infante C, Barahona M

Language: Spanish
References: 30
Page: 166-172
PDF size: 248.54 Kb.


ABSTRACT

In a patient with severe unicompartmental knee osteoarthritis where conservative treatments have been exhausted, with painful symptoms located on the affected side and with a reducible axis, the unicompartmental knee prosthesis (UKP) is the first option for our work group. Within the study to confirm the diagnosis and plan the surgery, weight-bearing knee x-rays, Rosenberg x-rays, and teleradiographs of the lower extremities stand out. The objective of surgery is to replace the affected area, restoring the anatomy with an adequate balance of soft tissues. Regarding alignment, the challenge is not to overload the opposite side or that of the prosthesis. There are mobile and fixed plates and although the clinical and survival results are similar, in recent years with the incorporation of robotic surgery, the balance has tipped towards the use of fixed plates. The clinical and functional results are better and there are fewer complications than when total knee prostheses (TKP) are used in the same type of patients. The survival studied in registries is lower than for TKP, but when used in high-flow centers where the percentage of UKP is close to a third of the total with strict patient selection, the duration is as good as in PTR.


REFERENCES

  1. Lee PY, Winfield TG, Harris SR, Storey E, Chandratreya A. Unloading knee brace is a cost-effective method to bridge and delay surgery in unicompartmental knee arthritis. BMJ Open Sport Exerc Med. 2017; 2(1): e000195.

  2. Amendola A, Bonasia DE. Results of high tibial osteotomy: review of the literature. Int Orthop. 2010; 34(2): 155-60.

  3. Kleeblad LJ, van der List JP, Zuiderbaan HA, Pearle AD. Larger range of motion and increased return to activity, but higher revision rates following unicompartmental versus total knee arthroplasty in patients under 65: a systematic review. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2018; 26(6): 1811-22.

  4. Arirachakaran A, Choowit P, Putananon C, Muangsiri S, Kongtharvonskul J. Is unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) superior to total knee arthroplasty (TKA)? A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trial. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. 2015; 25(5): 799-806.

  5. Wilson HA, Middleton R, Abram SGF, Smith S, Alvand A, Jackson WF, et al. Patient relevant outcomes of unicompartmental versus total knee replacement: systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ. 2019; 364: l352.

  6. Insall J, Walker P. Unicondylar knee replacement. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1976; (120): 83-5.

  7. Negrín R, Duboy J, Iñiguez M, Reyes N, Wainer M, Infante C, et al. Cirugía robótica en artroplastia de rodilla. Rev Chil Ortop Traumatol. 2019; 60: 67-76.

  8. Batailler C, White N, Ranaldi FM, Neyret P, Servien E, Lustig S. Improved implant position and lower revision rate with robotic-assisted unicompartmental knee arthroplasty. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2019; 27(4): 1232-40.

  9. Foissey C, Batailler C, Vahabi A, Fontalis A, Servien E, Lustig S. Better accuracy and implant survival in medial imageless robotic-assisted unicompartmental knee arthroplasty compared to conventional unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: two- to eleven-year follow-up of three hundred fifty-six consecutive knees. Int Orthop. 2023; 47(2): 533-41.

  10. Fontboté RC, Nemtala UF, Contreras OO, Guerrero R. Radiografía con carga en flexión para la detección precoz de artrosis de rodilla: mejorando el screening. Artroscopía. 2008; 15(1): 57-62.

  11. Negrín R, Duboy J, Iñiguez M, Reyes NO, Barahona M, Ferrer G, et al. Robotic-assisted vs conventional surgery in medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: a clinical and radiological study. Knee Surg Relat Res. 2021; 33(1): 5.

  12. Negrín R, Duboy J, Reyes NO, Barahona M, Iñiguez M, Infante C, et al. Robotic-assisted Unicompartmental knee Arthroplasty optimizes joint line restitution better than conventional surgery. J Exp Orthop. 2020; 7(1): 94.

  13. Migliorini F, Tingart M, Niewiera M, Rath B, Eschweiler J. Unicompartmental versus total knee arthroplasty for knee osteoarthritis. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. 2019; 29(4): 947-55.

  14. Chawla H, van der List JP, Christ AB, Sobrero MR, Zuiderbaan HA, Pearle AD. Annual revision rates of partial versus total knee arthroplasty: A comparative meta-analysis. Knee. 2017; 24(2): 179-90.

  15. Murray DW, Liddle AD, Dodd CA, Pandit H. Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: is the glass half full or half empty? Bone Joint J. 2015; 97-B(10 Suppl A): 3-8.

  16. Kennedy JA, Palan J, Mellon SJ, Esler C, Dodd CAF, Pandit HG, et al. Most unicompartmental knee replacement revisions could be avoided: a radiographic evaluation of revised Oxford knees in the National Joint Registry. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2020; 28(12): 3926-34.

  17. Foran JR, Brown NM, Della Valle CJ, Berger RA, Galante JO. Long-term survivorship and failure modes of unicompartmental knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2013; 471(1): 102-8.

  18. Liddle AD, Pandit H, Judge A, Murray DW. Patient-reported outcomes after total and unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: a study of 14,076 matched patients from the National Joint Registry for England and Wales. Bone Joint J. 2015; 97-B(6): 793-801.

  19. Berger RA, Meneghini RM, Jacobs JJ, Sheinkop MB, Della Valle CJ, Rosenberg AG, et al. Results of unicompartmental knee arthroplasty at a minimum of ten years of follow-up. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2005; 87(5): 999-1006.

  20. Newman J, Pydisetty RV, Ackroyd C. Unicompartmental or total knee replacement: the 15-year results of a prospective randomised controlled trial. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2009; 91(1): 52-7.

  21. Zuiderbaan HA, van der List JP, Khamaisy S, Nawabi DH, Thein R, Ishmael C, et al. Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty versus total knee arthroplasty: Which type of artificial joint do patients forget? Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2017; 25(3): 681-86.

  22. Fabre-Aubrespy M, Ollivier M, Pesenti S, Parratte S, Argenson JN. Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty in patients older than 75 results in better clinical outcomes and similar survivorship compared to total knee arthroplasty. A matched controlled study. J Arthroplasty. 2016; 31(12): 2668-71.

  23. Mannan A, Pilling RWD, Mason K, Stirling P, Duffy D, London N. Excellent survival and outcomes with fixed-bearing medial UKA in young patients ( ≤ 60 years) at minimum 10-year follow-up. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2020; 28(12): 3865-70.

  24. Barahona M, Barrientos C, Escobar F Sr, Diaz N, Palma D Sr, Barahona MA, et al. Trends in knee and hip arthroplasty in Chile between 2004 and 2019. Cureus. 2020; 12(12): e12185.

  25. Infante C, Barahona M, Palma D, Barrientos C, Palet M, Zamorano A, et al. Cohorte histórica de artroplastia unicompartimental de rodilla en un hospital universitario chileno. Rev Chil Ortop Traumatol. 2022; 63(1): e25-32.

  26. Chen W, Sun J, Zhang Y, Hu Z, Chen XY, Feng S. Staged vs simultaneous bilateral unicompartmental knee arthroplasty for clinical outcomes: A protocol of systematic review and meta-analysis. Medicine (Baltimore). 2021; 100(14): e25240.

  27. Lustig S, Lording T, Frank F, Debette C, Servien E, Neyret P. Progression of medial osteoarthritis and long term results of lateral unicompartmental arthroplasty: 10 to 18 year follow-up of 54 consecutive implants. Knee. 2014; 21 Suppl 1: S26-32.

  28. Gaggiotti G, Gaggiotti S, Ringa JC. Prótesis unicompartimental lateral de rodilla en el tratamiento del genu valgo artrósico. Resultados en 29 artroplastias con un seguimiento promedio de 6.2 años. Rev Asoc Argent Ortop Traumatol. 2021; 86(3): 299-308.

  29. Song MH, Kim BH, Ahn SJ, Yoo SH, Lee MS. Early complications after minimally invasive mobile-bearing medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2009; 24(8): 1281-4.

  30. Kayani B, Konan S, Tahmassebi J, Rowan FE, Haddad FS. An assessment of early functional rehabilitation and hospital discharge in conventional versus robotic-arm assisted unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: a prospective cohort study. Bone Joint J. 2019; 101-B(1): 24-33.




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com