2022, Number 1
Metagenomics and metatranscriptomics to mitigate methane emissions by ruminant animals
Language: Spanish
References: 89
Page: 1-18
PDF size: 451.18 Kb.
ABSTRACT
Ruminant livestock is considered one of the largest anthropogenic sources of methane gas. Methanogenesis is part of the digestive process of these animals and is mediated by the microorganisms present in their rumen, responsible not only for the loss of energy in the animal, which directly impacts the productivity of cattle, but also for the production of methane that contributes to the increase of the greenhouse effect. The functional characteristics of the rumen microbiome have not been well described because most of the microorganisms present are not cultivable under laboratory conditions, but can be studied using molecular techniques, such as metagenomics and metatranscriptomics. The objectives of this review article, in addition to compiling and disseminating information on the environmental impact of the livestock industry, are to describe some of the experimental and bioinformatic strategies used in the analysis of the ruminal microbiome from metagenomics and metatranscriptomics, to reduce emissions of methane by cattle.REFERENCES
Abubucker, S., Segata, N., Goll, J., Schubert, A. M., Izard,J., Cantarel, B. L., Rodriguez-Mueller, B., Zucker, J.,Thiagarajan, M., Henrissat, B., White, O., Kelley, S. T.,Methé, B., Schloss, P. D., Gevers, D., Mitreva, M. &Huttenhower, C. (2012). Metabolic Reconstruction forMetagenomic Data and Its Application to the HumanMicrobiome. PLOS Computational Biology, 8(6),e1002358. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1002358
Berg Miller, M. E., Yeoman, C. J., Chia, N., Tringe, S. G.,Angly, F. E., Edwards, R. A., Flint, H. J., Lamed, R., Bayer,E. A. & White, B. A. (2012). Phage-bacteria relationshipsand CRISPR elements revealed by a metagenomicsurvey of the rumen microbiome. EnvironmentalMicrobiology, 14(1), 207–227. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1462-2920.2011.02593.x
Bikel, S., Valdez-Lara, A., Cornejo-Granados, F., Rico,K., Canizales-Quinteros, S., Soberón, X., Del Pozo-Yauner, L. & Ochoa-Leyva, A. (2015). Combiningmetagenomics, metatranscriptomics and viromics to explorenovel microbial interactions: Towards a systems-levelunderstanding of human microbiome. Computational andStructural Biotechnology Journal, 13, 390–401. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.csbj.2015.06.001
Ciais, P., Sabine, C., Bala, G., Bopp, L., Brovkin, V., Canadell,J., Chhabra, A., DeFries, R., Galloway, J., Heimann, M.,Jones, C., Le Quéré, C., Myneni, R.B., Piao, S. & Thornton,P. (2013). Carbon and Other Biogeochemical Cycles.In: Climate Change 2013: The Physical Science Basis.Contribution of Working Group I to the Fifth AssessmentReport of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change[Stocker, T.F., D. Qin, G.-K. Plattner, M. Tignor, S.K. Allen,J.Boschung, A. Nauels, Y. Xia, V. Bex and P.M. Midgley(Ed.)].(pp. 465-570). Recuperado de https://www.ipcc.ch/site/assets/uploads/2018/02/WG1AR5_Chapter06_FINAL.pdf
Duin, E. C., Wagner, T., Shima, S., Prakash, D., Cronin, B.,Yáñez-Ruiz, D. R., Duval, S., Rümbeli, R., Stemmler, R. T.,Thauer, R. K. & Kindermann, M. (2016). Mode of actionuncovered for the specific reduction of methane emissionsfrom ruminants by the small molecule 3-nitrooxypropanol.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 113(22),6172–6177. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1600298113
Henderson, G., Cox, F., Kittelmann, S., Miri, V. H., Zethof, M.,Noel, S. J., Waghorn, G. C., & Janssen, P. H. (2013). Effectof DNA extraction methods and sampling techniques onthe apparent structure of cow and sheep rumen microbialcommunities. PloS One, 8(9), e74787. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0074787
Hoegh-Guldberg, O., Jacob, D., Taylor, M., Bindi, M., Brown,S., Camilloni, I., Diedhiou, A., Djalante, R., Ebi, K. L.,Engelbrecht, F., Hijioka, Y., Mehrotra, S., Payne, A.,Seneviratne, S. I., Thomas, A., Warren, R. & Zhou, G.(2018). Impacts of 1.5°C of Global Warming on Naturaland Human Systems. In: Global Warming of 1.5°C. AnIPCC Special Report on the impacts of global warmingof 1.5°C above pre-industrial levels and related globalgreenhouse gas emission pathways, in the context ofstrengthening the global response to the threat of climatechange, sustainable development, and efforts to eradicatepoverty. [Masson-Delmotte, V., P. Zhai, H.-O. Pörtner, D.Roberts, J. Skea, P.R. Shukla, A. Pirani, W. Moufouma-Okia,C. Péan, R. Pidcock, S. Connors, J.B.R. Matthews, Y. Chen,X. Zhou, M.I.Gomis, E. Lonnoy, T.Maycock, M.Tignor,and T. Waterfield (eds.)]. (pp. 177-181). Recuperado dehttps://www.ipcc.ch/site/assets/uploads/sites/2/2019/06/SR15_Chapter3_Low_Res.pdf
Looft, T., Johnson, T. A., Allen, H. K., Bayles, D. O., Alt, D. P.,Stedtfeld, R. D., Sul, W. J., Stedtfeld, T. M., Chai, B., Cole,J. R., Hashsham, S. A., Tiedje, J. M. & Stanton, T. B. (2012).In-feed antibiotic effects on the swine intestinal microbiome.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of theUnited States of America, 109(5), 1691–1696. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1120238109
Maeder, D. L., Anderson, I., Brettin, T. S., Bruce, D. C., Gilna,P., Han, C. S., Lapidus, A., Metcalf, W.W., Saunders, E.,Tapia, R. & Sowers, K. R. (2006). The Methanosarcinabarkeri genome: comparative analysis with Methanosarcinaacetivorans and Methanosarcina mazei reveals extensiverearrangement within methanosarcinal genomes. Journal ofbacteriology, 188(22), 7922–7931. https://doi.org/10.1128/JB.00810-06
Opio, C., Gerber, P., Motter, A., Falcucci, A., Tempio, G.,MacLeod, M., Vellinga, T., Henderson, B. & Steinfeld, H.(2013). Greenhouse gas emissions from ruminant supplychains – A global life cycle assessment. Recuperado dehttp://www.fao.org/publications/card/es/c/ff905a47-1479-595c-b891-d345ea13c0a0/.
Roehe, R., Dewhurst, R. J., Duthie, C.-A., Rooke, J. A.,McKain, N., Ross, D. W., Hyslop, J. J., Waterhouse, A.,Freeman, T. C., Watson, M. & Wallace, R. J. (2016). BovineHost Genetic Variation Influences Rumen MicrobialMethane Production with Best Selection Criterion forLow Methane Emitting and Efficiently Feed ConvertingHosts Based on Metagenomic Gene Abundance. PLoSGenetics, 12(2), e1005846. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1005846
Ruppert, K. M., Kline, R. J. & Rahman, M. S. (2019). Past,present, and future perspectives of environmental DNA(eDNA) metabarcoding: A systematic review in methods,monitoring, and applications of global eDNA. GlobalEcology and Conservation, 17(2019), e00547. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gecco.2019.e00547
Secretaría de Medio Ambiente y Recursos Naturales e InstitutoNacional de Ecología y Cambio Climático (2018). México,Sexta Comunicación Nacional y Segundo Informe Bienalde Actualización ante la Convención Marco de lasNaciones Unidas sobre el Cambio Climático. Recuperadode http://cambioclimatico.gob.mx:8080/xmlui/handle/publicaciones/117
Seshadri, R., Leahy, S. C., Attwood, G. T., Teh, K. H., Lambie,S. C., Cookson, A. L., Eloe-Fadrosh, E. A., Pavlopoulos,G. A., Hadjithomas, M., Varghese, N. J., Paez-Espino, D.,Perry, R., Henderson, G., Creevey, C. J., Terrapon, N.,Lapebie, P., Drula, E., Lombard, V., Rubin, E., Kyrpides,N.C., Henrissat, B., Woyke, T., Ivanova, N.N. & Kelly, W.J. (2018). Cultivation and sequencing of rumen microbiomemembers from the Hungate1000 Collection. NatureBiotechnology, 36(4), 359–367. https://doi.org/10.1038/nbt.4110
Shi, W., Moon, C. D., Leahy, S. C., Kang, D., Froula, J.,Kittelmann, S., Fan, C., Deutsch, S., Gagic, D., Seedorf,H., Kelly, W. J., Atua, R., Sang, C., Soni, P., Li, D.,Pinares-Patiño, C. S., McEwan, J. C., Janssen, P. H., Chen,F., Visel, A., Wang, Z., Attwood, G. T. & Rubin, E. M.(2014). Methane yield phenotypes linked to differentialgene expression in the sheep rumen microbiome. GenomeResearch, 24(9), 1517–1525. https://doi.org/10.1101/gr.168245.113
Söllinger, A., Tveit, A. T., Poulsen, M., Noel, S. J., Bengtsson,M., Bernhardt, J., Frydendahl Hellwing, A. L., Lund, P.,Riedel, K., Schleper, C., Højberg, O. & Urich, T. (2018).Holistic Assessment of Rumen Microbiome Dynamicsthrough Quantitative Metatranscriptomics RevealsMultifunctional Redundancy during Key Steps of AnaerobicFeed Degradation. MSystems, 3(4), e00038-18. https://doi.org/10.1128/mSystems.00038-18
Sosa, A., Galindo, J. & Bocourt, R. (2007). Metanogénesisruminal: Aspectos generales y manipulación para su control.Revista Cubana de Ciencia Agrícola, 41(2), 105–114.https://biblat.unam.mx/es/revista/revista-cubana-deciencia-agricola/articulo/metanogenesis-ruminal-aspectosgenerales-y-manipulacion-para-su-control
Thoetkiattikul, H., Mhuantong, W., Laothanachareon, T.,Tangphatsornruang, S., Pattarajinda, V., Eurwilaichitr,L. & Champreda, V. (2013). Comparative analysis ofmicrobial profiles in cow rumen fed with different dietaryfiber by tagged 16S rRNA gene pyrosequencing. CurrentMicrobiology, 67(2), 130–137. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00284-013-0336-3
Villegas-Rivera, G., Vargas-Cabrera, Y., González-Silva, N.,Aguilera-García, F., Gutiérrez-Vázquez, E., Bravo-Patiño,A., Cajero-Juárez, M., Baizabal-Aguirre, V. M. & Valdez-Alarcón, J. J. (2013). Evaluation of DNA extractionmethods of rumen microbial populations. World Journal ofMicrobiology and Biotechnology, 29(2), 301–307. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11274-012-1183-2
Wang, P., Qi, M., Barboza, P., Leigh, M. B., Ungerfeld, E.,Selinger, L. B., McAllister, T. A. & Forster, R. J. (2011).Isolation of high-quality total RNA from rumen anaerobicbacteria and fungi, and subsequent detection of glycosidehydrolases. Canadian Journal of Microbiology, 57(7),590–598. https://doi.org/10.1139/w11-048