medigraphic.com
ISSN 1729-519X (Print)

2021, Number 6

<< Back Next >>

Revista Habanera de Ciencias Médicas 2021; 20 (6)

Academic satisfaction among Health Sciences Students before and during the COVID-19 pandemic

Ventura-León J, Caycho-Rodríguez T, Talledo-Sánchez K

Language: Spanish
References: 28
Page: 1-7
PDF size: 790.20 Kb.


ABSTRACT

Introduction: The COVID-19 pandemic is a public health emergency that has substantially modified medical education from face-to-face to online teaching modalities.
Objective: To evaluate academic satisfaction before and during the COVID-19 pandemic in a sample of university students of health sciences in Peru.
Material and Methods: Observational, cross-sectional, and comparative study. An ad hoc sociodemographic form was used; the following questions were included: How would you rate your academic performance at the university? Had you taken any virtual courses before the pandemic? Do you have internet connection at home? Did you fail any course last semester? What is your occupation? The Academic Satisfaction Scale (ASE), which was composed of eight items, was also used. All the questions were asked using a form that was valid on the virtual platform of the university for two weeks and applied in June 2019 (first evaluation) and August 2020 (second evaluation).
Results: Among the sociodemographic variables evaluated, the poor quality of internet connectivity (Cohen’s d = -0,65) and self-assessment of performance as very high (Cohen’s d = -0,72) show moderate differences between 2019 and 2020.
Conclusions: The academic satisfaction among health sciences students during the COVID-19 health emergency change considerably when the Internet connectivity is poor and the students evaluate themselves as high achievers, variables that can be considered when designing curricular strategies for health sciences students.


REFERENCES

  1. Hassan S, Algahtani FD, Zrieq R, Aldhmadi BK, Atta A, Obeidat RM, et al. Academic self-perception and coursesatisfaction among university students taking virtual classes during the covid-19 pandemic in the kingdom of saudiarabia(Ksa). Educ Sci [Internet].2021 Mar [Citado 24/04/2021];11(3):134. Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci11030134

  2. Quispe Prieto S, Cavalcanti Bandos MF, Caipa Ramos M, Paucar Caceres A, Rojas Jiménez HH. A systemic frameworkto evaluate student satisfaction in Latin American universities under the covid-19 pandemic. Systems [Internet].2021Mar [Citado 24/04/2021];9(1):1-24. Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.3390/systems9010015

  3. El Peruano. Clases Semipresenciales a Partir del Próximo Año [Internet]. Perú: El Peruano; 2020 [Citado 24/04/2021].Disponible en: https://elperuano.pe/ noticia/104569-clases-semipresenciales-a-partir-del-proximo-ano

  4. Vergel Ortega M, Gallardo Pérez H de J, Márquez Peñaranda JF. Escala para valororar el estrés en estudiantes decursos de física en tiempos de la Covid-19. Rev Boletín Redipe [Internet].2021 Jan [Citado 24/04/2021];10(1):248-58.Disponible en: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4377-3903

  5. AlAteeq DA, Aljhani S, AlEesa D. Perceived stress among students in virtual classrooms during the COVID-19 outbreakin KSA. J Taibah Univ Med Sci. 2020 Oct;15(5):398-403.

  6. Gonçalves SP, Sousa MJ, Pereira FS. Distance learning perceptions from higher education students—the case ofPortugal. Educ Sci [Internet]. 2020 Dec [Citado 24/04/2021];10(12):1-15. Disponible en: www.mdpi.com/journal/education

  7. Bristow D, Shepherd CD, Humphreys M, Ziebell M. To Be Or Not To Be: That Isn’t the Question! An Empiric al Look atOnline Versus Traditional Brick-and-Mortar Courses at the University Level. Mark Educ Rev [Internet].2011 Oct [Citado24/04/2021];21(3):241-50. Disponible en: https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.2753/MER1052-8008210304

  8. Ganesh G, Paswan A, Sun Q. Are Face-to-Face Classes More Effective Than Online Classes? An Empirical Examination.Mark Educ Rev [Internet]. 2015 May [Citado 24/04/2021];25(2):67-81. Disponible en: https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/10528008.2015.1029851

  9. Gopal R, Singh V, Aggarwal A. Impact of online classes on the satisfaction and performance of students during thepandemic period of COVID 19. Educ Inf Technol [Internet]. 2021 Apr [Citado 24/04/2021];1:25. Disponible en: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33903795

  10. Medrano LA, Pérez E. Adaptación de la Escala de Satisfacción Académica a la Población Universitaria de Córdoba.Summa Psicológica. 2013;7(2):5-14.

  11. Franzen J, Jermann F, Ghisletta P, Rudaz S, Bondolfi G, Tran NT. Psychological distress and well-being amongstudents of health disciplines: The importance of academic satisfaction. Int J Environ Res Public Health [Internet]. 2021Feb [Citado 24/04/2021];18(4):1-9. Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18042151

  12. Jan SK. The relationships between academic self-efficacy, computer self-efficacy, prior experience, and satisfactionwith online learning. Am J Distance Educ [Internet].2015 [Citado 24/04/2021];29(1):30-40. Disponible en: https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/08923647.2015.994366

  13. Landrum B, Bannister J, Garza G, Rhame S. A class of one: Students’ satisfaction with online learning. J Educ Bus[Internet].2021 [Citado 24/04/2021];96(2):82-8. Disponible en: https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/08832323.2020.1757592

  14. Özgüngör S. Identifying dimensions of students’ratings that best predict students’ self efficacy, course value andsatisfaction. Egit Arastirmalari - Eurasian J Educ Res [Internet].2010 [Citado 24/04/2021];10(38):146-63. Disponible en:https://app.trdizin.gov.tr/makale/TVRBNE9EazJOZz09/identifying-dimensions-of-students-ratings-that-best-predictstudents-self-efficacy-course-value-and-satisfaction

  15. Noel-Levitz. The 2013 National Student Satisfaction and Priorities Report: Four-Year Private Colleges andUniversities—Form A [Internet]. EE. UU: Noel-Levitz; 2013 [Citado 24/04/2021]. Disponible en: http://www.noellevitz.com/Benchmark

  16. Coman C, Țîru LG, Meseșan Schmitz L, Stanciu C, Bularca MC. Online teaching and learning in higher educationduring the coronavirus pandemic: Students’ perspective. Sustain [Internet].2020 [Citado 24/04/2021];12(24):1-22.Disponible en: https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v12y2020i24p10367-d460544.html

  17. Maxwell JA. Qualitative research design: An interactive approach. 3 ed. California: Sage publications; 2012.

  18. Domínguez Lara SA. Autorreporte del rendimiento en exámenes: un informe exploratorio. Investig en Educ Médica.2017;6(23):215.

  19. Lent RW, Singley D, Sheu HB, Schmidt JA, Schmidt LC. Relation of Social-Cognitive Factors to Academic Satisfactionin Engineering Students. J Career Assess [Internet].2007 Feb [Citado 24/04/2021];15(1):87-97. Disponible en: http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/1069072706294518

  20. Hoerger M, Currell C. Ethical issues in Internet research. En su: APA handbook of ethics in psychology. Practice,teaching, and research [Internet]. Washington: American Psychological Association; 2011.p. 385-400 [Citado24/04/2021]. Disponible en: http://record/2011-11699-018

  21. Ventura León J. Otras formas de entender la d de Cohen. Rev Evaluar (Internet). 2018 Feb [Citado 24/04/2021];18(3):10-5. Disponible en: https://bit.ly/3ocTw37

  22. Hirschauer N, Grüner S, Mußhoff O, Becker C, Jantsch A. Can p-values be meaningfully interpreted without randomsampling? Stat Surv [Internet]. 2020 Feb [Citado 24/04/2021];14(1):71-91. Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.1214/20-SS129

  23. Conde Rodríguez Á, Deaño Deaño M, Pinto Moreira Diniz AA, Iglesias Sarmiento V, Alfonso Gil S, García SeñoránM, et al. Expectativas académicas y planificación. Claves para la interpretación del fracaso y el abandono académico.Int J Dev Educ Psychol [Internet].2017 May [Citado 24/04/2021];1(1):167-76. Disponible en: https://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=349852544017

  24. Tawafak RM, Romli AM, Alsinani MJ. Student assessment feedback effectiveness model for enhancing teachingmethod and developing academic performance. Int J Inf Commun Technol Educ [Internet]. 2019 May [Citado24/04/2021];15(3):75-88. Disponible en: http://dx.doi.org/10.4018/IJICTE.2019070106

  25. Datum. Satisfacción con el servicio internet durante el período de cuarentena por la COVID-19 [Internet]. Perú:Datum; 2020 [Citado 24/04/2021]. Disponible en: https://www.datum.com.pe/new_web_files/files/pdf

  26. Castioni R, De Melo AAS, Nascimento PM, Ramos DL. Brazilian federal universities in the Covid-19 pandemic: studentinternet access and emergency remote Teaching. Ensaio. [Internet] 2021 May [Citado 24/04/2021];29(111):399-419.Disponible en: https://bit.ly/3xMnX3n

  27. Ferri F, Grifoni P, Guzzo T. Online Learning and Emergency Remote Teaching: Opportunities and Challenges inEmergency Situations. Societies [Internet]. 2020 Nov [Citado 24/04/2021];10(4):86. Disponible en: www.mdpi.com/journal/societies

  28. Baber H. Determinants of students’ perceived learning outcome and satisfaction in online learning during thepandemic of COVID19. J Educ e-Learning Res [Internet]. 2020 May [Citado 24/04/2021];7(3):285-92. Disponible en:10.20448/journal.509.2020.73.285.292




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com