medigraphic.com
ISSN 1729-519X (Print)

2021, Number 4

<< Back Next >>

Revista Habanera de Ciencias Médicas 2021; 20 (4)

Preoperative intraocular pressure for the control of primary angle closure treated with clear lens extraction

Pérez GH, Hernández SJR, Tamargo BTO, Garcia CY

Language: Spanish
References: 20
Page: 1-7
PDF size: 652.16 Kb.


ABSTRACT

Introduction: Clear lens extraction is considered in patients older than 50 years with primary angle closure and intraocular pressure greater than or equal to 30 mm Hg or damage due to glaucoma. The results are unknown in eyes with a moderate elevation of intraocular pressure.
Objective: To evaluate the influence of preoperative intraocular pressure in the control of the primary angle closure treated with clear lens extraction.
Material and Methods: A pre-experimental study was conducted between January 2013 and January 2020. It included a total of 78 eyes of 78 patients with primary angle closure treated with clear lens extraction. They were divided into two groups according to preoperative intraocular pressure. For statistical analysis, Chi-square test, Fisher’s exact probability test, and t test were used for independent samples and analysis of variance with repeated measurements; with 95 % statistical significance.
Results: There were significant differences in axial length (p=0,003), lens thickness (p<0,001) and central corneal thickness (p=0,016) between both groups. Intraocular pressure and the number of eye drops varied very significantly (p<0,001) between the pre-and postoperative periods and between both groups at the different moments analyzed. In group A, 94,4 % of the eyes showed absolute postoperative control, which remained unchanged over time. In group B, most eyes had relative control. There were very significant differences (p<0,001) between both groups.
Conclusions: Preoperative intraocular pressure influences the control of primary angle closure treated with clear lens extraction; previous values less than 30 mm Hg favor better postoperative control.


REFERENCES

  1. Tanna AP, Boland MV, Giaconi JA, Krishnan C, Lin SC, Medeiros FA, et al. Basic and Clinical Science Course:Glaucoma. 2020-2021. San Francisco: American Academy of Ophthalmology; 2020.

  2. Krishnadas R. Current management options in primary angle closure disease. Indian J Ophthalmol. 2019; 67 (3): 321-3.

  3. Masis M, Mineault PJ, Phan E. The role of phacoemulsification in glaucoma therapy: a systematic review andmeta-analysis. Surv Ophthalmol. 2018; 63 (5): 700-10.

  4. Cárdenas Chacón D, Fumero González FY, Piloto Díaz I, Fernández Argones L, Díaz Aguila Y, Obret Mendive I.Facoemulsificación en pacientes con catarata. Rev Cubana Oftalmol. 2017; 30 (4): 1-10.

  5. Azuara Blanco A, Burr J, Ramsay C. Effectiveness of early lens extraction for the treatment of primary angleclosureglaucoma (EAGLE): a randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2016; 388 (10052): 1389-97.

  6. Napier ML, Azuara Blanco A. Changing patterns in treatment of angle closure glaucoma. Curr Opinion Ophthalmol.2018; 29 (2): 130-4.

  7. Dada T, Rathi A, Angmo D, Agarwal T, Vaqnathi M, Khokhar S. Clinical outcomes of clear lens extraction in eyeswith primary angle closure. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2015; 41 (7): 1470-77.

  8. Jiang Y, Wang D, Wang W. Five-year changes in anterior segment parameters in an older population in urbansouthern China: the Liwan Eye Study. Br J Ophthalmol. 2020; 104 (4): 582-7.

  9. Chen Z, Sun J, Li M, Liu S, Chen L, Jing S, et al. Effect of age on the morphologies of the human Schlemm’s canaland trabecular meshwork measured with swept‑source optical coherence tomography. Eye. 2018; 32 (10): 1621-28.

  10. Ahram DF, Alward WL, Kuehn MH. The genetic mechanisms of primary angle closure glaucoma. Eye. 2015; 29(10): 1251-9.

  11. Kwon J, Sung KR, Han S. Long-term changes in anterior segment characteristics of eyes with different PrimaryAngle-Closure mechanisms. Am J Ophthalmol. 2018; 191: 54-63.

  12. Fernández Argones L, Fumero González FY, Padilla González CM, Piloto Díaz I, Carcaset Chamizo AI. Característicasestructurales del disco óptico y la capa de fibras neurorretinianas mediante tomografía confocal láser en la sospechade cierre angular primario. Rev Cubana Oftalmol. 2012; 25 (1): 374-86.

  13. Congdon NG, Youlin Q, Quiley H. Biometry and primary angle closure glaucoma among chinese, white and blackpopulations. Ophthalmol. 1997; 104 (9): 1489-95.

  14. Baek SU, Kim KH, Lee JY, Lee KW. Long-term Intraocular Pressure Elevation after Primary Angle Closure Treatedwith Early Phacoemulsification. Korean J Ophthalmol. 2018; 32 (2): 108-15.

  15. Angmo D, Shakrawal J, Gupta B, Yadav S, Pandey RM, Dada T. Comparative Evaluation of PhacoemulsificationAlone versus Phacoemulsification with Goniosynechialysis in Primary Angle-Closure Glaucoma: A RandomizedControlled Trial. Ophthalmol Glaucoma. 2019; 2 (5): 346-56.

  16. Harathy S, Dewang A, Ankit T, Suresh Y, Arpit S, Tanuj D. Changes in intraocular pressure and angle status afterphacoemulsification in primary angle closure hypertension. J Glaucoma. 2019; 28 (2): 105-10.

  17. Pandav SS, Seth NG, Arora A, Thattaruthody F, Jurangal A, Kaushik S, et al. Intraocular pressure reduction in aspectrum of angle closure disease following cataract extraction. Indian J Ophthalmol. 2019; 67 (9):1433-8.

  18. Chen HY, Lin CHL, Kao CH. Changes in glaucoma medication numbers after cataract and glaucoma surgery. Anationwide population-based study. Medicine [Internet]. 2019 [Citado 22/03/2020];98(4):[Aprox. 5p.]. Disponible en:http://doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000014128

  19. Atalay E, Nongpiur ME, Baskaran M, Perera SA, Wong TT, Quek D, et al. Intraocular pressure change afterphacoemulsification in angle-closure eyes without medical therapy. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2017; 43 (6): 767-73.

  20. Ling JD, Bell NP. Role of Cataract Surgery in the Management of Glaucoma. Int Ophthalmol Clin. 2018; 58 (3):87-100.




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com