2023, Number 2
<< Back
Odovtos-Int J Dent Sc 2023; 25 (2)
CBCT Study of Root Apices Distance to Mandibular Canal in Peruvian Population
Manrique P, Agurto A, Guerrero ME
Language: English
References: 36
Page: 144-154
PDF size: 390.95 Kb.
ABSTRACT
The purpose of this study was to compare the average distances from the
root apices of the first molars, second molars, and second premolars to the mandibular
canal according to sex in the Peruvian population using cone-beam computed
tomography (CBCT). Eighty CBCT scans of Peruvian patients aged from 15-80 years
were examined. After locating the mandibular canal, measurements of the vertical
distances from the mandibular canal to the apices of the second premolars, as well as
the first molars and second molars, were made. For the statistical analysis, Student’s
t test was used for both paired and unpaired samples, with a significance level of
p‹0.05. On the right side, the second molar presented a mean distance of 3.99mm
for males and 2.87mm for females, showing a significant difference (p‹0.05). When
compared bilaterally, no significant differences were found (p›0.05) between the
distances from the apices of the second premolars and the first and second molars to
the mandibular canal. However, for the second premolars and second molars on the
left side, the values were higher, with averages of 5.52mm and 3.75mm, respectively.
The mesial roots of the second molars were closer to the mandibular canal. In addition,
women showed shorter distances than men.
REFERENCES
Singh V. Textbook of Anatomy Head, Neckand Brain Volume III Second Edition. 2nd ed.India: Elsevier; 2014.
Kabak S.L., Zhuravleva N.V., MelnichenkoY.M. Topography of the mandibular nerve inhuman embryos and fetuses. an histomorphologicalstudy. J Oral Res. 2017; 6 (11): 291-8.
Wolf K.T., Brokaw E.J., Bell A., Joy A. Variantmandibular nerves and implications for localanesthesia. Anesth Prog. 2016; 63 (2): 84-90.
Puciło M., Lipski M., Sroczyk-JaszczyńskaM., Puciło A., Nowicka A. The anatomicalrelationship between the roots of eruptedpermanent teeth and the mandibular canal: asystematic review. Surg Radiol Anat. 2020;42 (5): 529-42.
Kabak S.L., Zhuravleva N.V., MelnichenkoY.M., Savrasova N.A. Сross-Sectional Anatomic Study of Direct Positional RelationshipsBetween Mandibular Canal and Roots ofPosterior Teeth Using Cone Beam ComputedTomography. J Oral Res. 2018; 7 (8): 292-8.
Libersa P., Savignat M. Neurosensory Disturbancesof the Mandibular nerve : A RetrospectiveStudy of Complaints in a 10-YearPeriod. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2007; 1486-9.
Byun S., Kim S., Chung H., Lim H., HeiW., Woo J., et al. Surgical managementof damaged mandibular nerve caused byendodontic overfilling of calcium hydroxidepaste. Int Endod J. 2015; 1-10.
Yates J., Ali A.B.J. Risk of mandibular nerveinjury with coronectomy vs surgical extractionof mandibular third molars- A comparisonof two techniques and review of theliterature. J Oral Rehabil. 2018; 45: 250-7.
Castro R., Guivarc’h M., Foletti J.M., CatherineJ.H., Chossegros C., Guyot L. Endodontic-related mandibular nerve injuries: A reviewand a therapeutic flow chart. J Stomatol OralMaxillofac Surg. 2018; 119 (5): 412-8.
Doh R., Shin S., You T.M. Delayed paresthesiaof mandibular nerve after dental surgery :case report and related pathophysiology. JDent Anesth Pain Med. 2018; 18 (3): 177-82.
Tay A., J Z. Clinical characteristics of trigeminalnerve injury referrals to a universitycentre. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2007; 36:922-7.
Ahmad M. The Anatomical Nature of DentalParesthesia: A Quick Review. Open Dent J.2018; 12 (1): 155-9.
Pogrel M.A. Damage to the mandibular nerveas the result of root canal therapy. J Am DentAssoc. 2007; 138 (1): 65-9.
MacDonald D. Cone-beam computedtomography and the dentist. J Investig ClinDent. 2017; 8 (1): 1-6.
Nasseh I., Al-Rawi W. Cone Beam ComputedTomography. Dent Clin North Am. 2018;62 (3): 361-91.
García-Sanz V., Bellot-Arcís C., HernándezV., Serrano-Sánchez P., Guarinos J., Paredes-Gallardo V. Accuracy and Reliability ofCone-Beam Computed Tomography forLinear and Volumetric Mandibular CondyleMeasurements. A Human Cadaver Study. SciRep. 2017; 7 (1): 1-8.
Pagare S., Roy C., Vahanwala S., Gavand K.,Waghmare M., Goyal S. Estimation of mandibularnerve proximitytothe root api-ces : ACBVI analysis. Int J Dent Res. 2018; 6 (1): 13.
Srnivasan K., Mohammadi M., ShepherdJ. Applications of linac-mounted kilovoltageCone-beam Computed Tomography inmodern radiation therapy: A review. Polish JRadiol. 2014; 79: 181-93.
Hiremath H., Agarwal R., Hiremath V.,Phulambrikar T. Evaluation of proximityof mandibular molars and second premolarto mandibular nerve canal among centralIndians: A cone-beam computed tomographicretrospective study. Indian J Dent Res.
2016; 27 (3): 312-6.20. Lvovsky A., Bachrach S., Kim H.C.,Pawar A., Levinzon O., Ben Itzhak J., et al.Relationship between Root Apices and theMandibular Canal: A Cone-beam ComputedTomographic Comparison of 3 Populations. JEndod. 2018; 44 (4): 555-8.
Choon O.W., Rahman S.A., Shaari R., AlamM.K. The validation of radiography imagesof romexis software. Int Med J. 2013; 20 (3):349-51.
Pääsky E., Suomalainen A., Ventä I. Arewomen more susceptible than men to iatrogenicmandibular nerve injury in dental implantsurgery? Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2022; 51(2): 251-6.
Marinescu Gava M., Suomalainen A., VehmasT., Ventä I. Did malpractice claims for faileddental implants decrease after introduction ofCBCT in Finland? Clin Oral Investig. 2019;23 (1): 399-404.
Sedaghatfar M., August M.A., Dodson T.B.Panoramic radiographic findings as predictorsof mandibular nerve exposure followingthird molar extraction. J Oral MaxillofacSurg. 2005; 63 (1): 3-7.
Tilotta-Yasukawa F., Millot S., El HaddiouiA., Bravetti P., Gaudy J.F. Labiomandibularparesthesia caused by endodontic treatment:an anatomic and clinical study. Oral Surgery,Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endodontology.2006;102 (4).
Razumova S., Brago A., Howijieh A., BarakatH., Kozlova Y.R.N. Evaluation the Relationshipbetween Mandibular Molar Root Apicesand Mandibular Canal among Residents ofthe Moscow Population using Cone-BeamComputed Tomography Technique. ContempClin Dent. 2022; 13 (1): 3-8.
Oliveira A.C.S., Candeiro G.T.M., Pachecoda Costa F.F.N., Gazzaneo I.D., Alves F.R.F.,Marques F.V. Distance and Bone Densitybetween the Root Apex and the MandibularCanal: A Cone-beam Study of 9202 Rootsfrom a Brazilian Population. J Endod. 2019;45 (5): 538-542.e2.
Pearson A. The early innervation of thedeveloping deciduous teeth. J Anat. 1977;123(3): 563-77.
Krarup S., Darvann T.A., Larsen P., MarshJ.L., Kreiborg S. Three-dimensional analysisof mandibular growth and tooth eruption. JAnat. 2005; 207 (5): 669-82.
Björnerk A., Skieller V. Normal and abnormalgrowth of the mandible. A synthesis oflongitudinal cephalometric implant studiesover a period of 25 years. Eur J Orthod. 1983;5 (1): 1-46.
Ahmed A.A., Ahmed R.M., Jamleh A.,Spagnuolo G. Morphometric analysis of themandibular canal, anterior loop, and mentalforamen: A cone-beam computed tomographyevaluation. Int J Environ Res PublicHealth. 2021; 18 (7): 1-11.
Simonton J.D., Azevedo B., Schindler W.G.,Hargreaves K.M. Age-and Gender-relatedDifferences in the Position of the Mandibularnerve by Using Cone Beam ComputedTomography. J Endod. 2009; 35 (7): 944-9.
Schierz O., Dommel S., Hirsch C., ReissmannD.R. Occlusal tooth wear in the generalpopulation of Germany: Effects of age,sex, and location of teeth. J Prosthet Dent.2014;112 (3): 465-71.
Bicaj T., Pustina T., Ahmedi E., Dula L., LilaZ., Tmava-Dragusha A., et al. The Relationbetween the Preferred Chewing Side andOcclusal Force Measured by T-Scan IIISystem. Open J Stomatol. 2015; 05 (04):95-101.
Gershenson A., Nathan H., Luchansky E. Mentalforamen and mental nerve: Changes with age.Acta Anat (Basel). 1986; 126 (1): 21-8.
Angel J.S., Mincer H.H., Chaudhry J.,Scarbecz M. Cone-beam Computed Tomographyfor Analyzing Variations in Inferior AlveolarCanal Location in Adults in Relation toAge and Sex. J Forensic Sci. 2011; 56 (1):216-9.
Full text