medigraphic.com
ISSN 1561-2945 (Print)

2021, Number 4

<< Back Next >>

Revista Cubana de Cirugía 2021; 60 (4)

Characterization of patients operated on for esophageal cancer in Cuba

Castellanos GJA, Mederos CON, Barrera OJC, Romero DCA, Adefna PRI, Leal MA

Language: Spanish
References: 25
Page: 1-15
PDF size: 458.77 Kb.


ABSTRACT

Introduction: Cancer in Cuba is a serious health concern due to its high incidence and mortality rates. It represents the first cause of years of life potentially lost and. Esophageal cancer is rare, but its behavior is more aggressive and its survival rate is low.
Objective: To characterize patients operated on for esophageal cancer in Cuba in the period from 1988 to 2020.
Methods: A nonrandomized, multicenter, clinical-epidemiological and observational research was carried out in the period from 1988 to 2020. The universe and the sample consisted of 595 patients from nine hospital institutions. Some of the variables studied included sex, age, histological variety, surgical intervention performed, and presence of associated comorbidities.
Results: There was a predominance of the male sex (66.1%). The average age was 62.8 years. Hypoproteinemia was present in 46.1%. 43.2% of patients were smokers and 35.8% drank alcoholic beverages. Epidermoid was the most frequent histological variety (64.6%). The most widely used surgical techniques were Ivor Lewis (68.4%) and transhiatal (63.6%) esophagectomies. There was a predominance of one-plane, termino-lateral anastomosis of thoracic location for epidermoid cases (68.4%) and the cervical one for adenocarcinoma cases (71.4%), performed manually on the posterior face.
Conclusion: Esophageal cancer prevailed in men over 55 years of age, smokers and with hypoproteinemia. The most used surgical techniques were Ivor Lewis and transhiatal esophagectomies.


REFERENCES

  1. Naciones Unidas. La Agenda 2030 y los Objetivos de Desarrollo Sostenible: una oportunidad para América Latina y el Caribe. Santiago; 2018.

  2. Cintra Brooks ST, Pérez AC, Cintra Pérez S. Cáncer de esófago. Revisión actualizada. Rev Inf Cient. 2016 [acceso 25/07/2019];95(4):635-46. Disponible en: http://www.revinfcientifica.sld.cu/index.php/ric/article/view/97/2294

  3. Italo Braghetto M, Gonzalo Cardemil H, Attila Csendes J, Enrique Lanzarini S, MaherMushle K, Francisco Venturelli M, et al. Resultados de la cirugía actual para el tratamiento del cancer de esofago. Rev Chil Cir. 2016 [acceso 26/07/2019]68(1). Disponible en: https://scielo.conicyt.cl/scielo

  4. Chadi SA, Fingerhut A, Berho M, DeMeester SR, Fleshman JW, Hyman NH, et al. Emerging trends in the etiology, prevention, and treatment of gastrointestinal anastomotic leakage. J Gastrointest Surg. 2016;20:2035-51.

  5. Gómez-Urrutia JM, Manrique AM. Epidemiología del cáncer de esófago en el Hospital Juárez de México. Rev. Amegendoscop. 2017 [acceso 30/10/2016];29(1):11-5.

  6. Navas Silva DJ. Comportamiento clínico-epidemiológico del cáncer de esófago en el hospital provincial docente Ambato período junio-noviembre del año 2016 [Tesis de terminación de residencia]. Ambato, Ecuador: UNIANDES. 2017 [acceso 25/11/2016]. Disponible en: http://dspace.unidades.edu.ec/handle/123456789/6318

  7. Sohda M, Kuwano H. Estado Actual y Perspectivas Futuras para el Tratamiento del Cáncer Esofágico. Ann Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2017;23(1):36-48.

  8. Bedennel L, lledo G, Marriette C. Cáncer de esófago. EMC. 2017 [acceso 20/04/2017];21(4):1-7.

  9. Earlam R, Cunha-Melo J: Oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma. I. A critical review of surgery. Br J Surg. 1980;67:381-7.

  10. Mederos Curbelo ON, Barreras Ortega JC, Romero Díaz CA, Cantero Ronquillo A, Menchaca Diaz JL. Bypass gástrico tubular isoperistáltico (Postlethwait) en el cáncer de esófago irresecable. Rev Cubana Oncol. 2001;17(2):135-7.

  11. Ferrá A, Martín MA. Resultados obtenidos con el tratamiento quirúrgico en el cáncer esofágico. Rev Cub Cir. 2003;42(3):16-28.

  12. Leal MA, Rivas TO, Mederos CO, Díaz MM, Bernot RD. Tratamiento quirúrgico del cáncer de esófago. Revisión estadística de 1970 hasta 1986. Rev Cub Cir. 1988;27(6):23-30.

  13. Nazario Dolz AM, Falcón Vilariño CG, Matos Tamayo ME. Caracterización de pacientes con cáncer de esófago en el bienio 2013-2014. MEDISAN. 2016 [acceso 30/12/ 2016];20(2):143-53.

  14. Avalos García R, Bouza Caballero C, Umpierrez García I. Caracterización clínicopatológica de los pacientes con cáncer esofágico en el Hospital Mario Muñoz Monroy, Matanzas. Rev Méd Electrón. 2015 [acceso 30/10/ 2016];36(4). Disponible en: http://scielo.sld.cu//scielo.php?script=sci_artext&pid=s1684-18242015000400005

  15. Rice TW, Kelsen DP, Blackstone EH. Esophagus and esophagogastric junction. In: Amin MB, Edge SB, Greene FL, et al., eds. AJCC Cancer Staging Manual. 8th ed. New York, NY: Springer; 2017. p. 185-202.

  16. Amin MB, Greene FL, Edge SB. The Eighth Edition AJCC Cancer Staging Manual: Connuing to Build a Bridge From a Population-Based to a More "Personalized" Approach to Cancer Staging. CA Cancer J Clin. 2017 Mar;67(2):93-9.

  17. Chao YK, Chuang WY, Chang HK. Prognosis of patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma who achieve major histopathological response atier neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2017;43(1):234-9.

  18. Barreras JC, Mederos ON, Menchaca Díaz JL, Cantero Ronquillo A, Valdés Jiménez J. Resultados quirúrgicos en el cáncer de esófago y cardias. Rev Cub Oncol. 2000;2(16):116-9.

  19. Santell Odio FB, Carballosa Espinosa L, Cintra Broks ST, Moró Vela R, Robinson Jay J. Cáncer de esófago. Estudio de 20 años en casos intervenidos con lesiones resecables. RIC. 2008 [acceso 25/03/2015];58(2). Disponible en: http://gtm.sld.cu/sitios/cpicm/contenido/ric/textos/Vol58No2/canceresofago.pdf

  20. Lordick F, Mariette C, Haustermans K, Obermannová R, Arnold D. Oesophageal cancer: ESMO Clinical Practice Guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up. Ann Oncol. 2016;27:50-7.

  21. Matthew W, Kristina G, Vincent T. Esophageal Cancer - American Family Physician. 2017;95(1):22-8.

  22. Mishra PK, Shah H, Gupta N, Varshney V, Patil NS, Jain A, et al. Stapled versus handsewn cervical esophagogastric anastomosis in patients undergoing esophagectomy: A Retrospective Cohort Study. Annals of Medicine and Surgery. 2016;5:118-24.

  23. Sugimura K, Miyata H, Matsunaga T, Asukai K, Yanagimoto Y, Takahashi Y, et al. 15 Comparison of the modified Collard and hand-sewn anastomosis for cervical esophagogastric anastomosis after esophagectomy in esophageal cancer patients: A propensity score-matched analysis. Annals of gastroenterological surgery. 2019;3(1):104-13.

  24. Ishibashi Y, Fukunaga T, Mikami S, Oka S, Kanda S, Yube Y, et al. Triple-stapled quadrilateral anastomosis: a new technique for creation of an esophagogastric anastomosis. Esophagus. 2018;15(2):88-94.

  25. Zhou D, Liu QX, Deng XF, Min JX, Dai JG. Comparison of two different mechanical esophagogastric anastomosis in esophageal cancer patients: a meta-analysis. Journal of cardiothoracic surgery. 2015;10(1):67.




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com