Farías-Vela AP, Capera-López LF, Díaz-Quijano DM, Ortiz-Zornosa S, Restrepo-Guarnizo MC, Restrepo-Castro OI

Language: Spanish
References: 16
Page: 299-306
PDF size: 192.22 Kb.

ABSTRACT

Objective: To identify, by means of a survey, the knowledge of specialists and residents in Gynaecology and Obstetrics of the benefits of respectful and dignified care for the patient at the time of delivery.
Materials and Methods: Observational, descriptive, cross-sectional, and prospective study carried out on a sample of obstetrician-gynecologists and residents from different universities and institutions in Colombia to whom a structured instrument was applied individually, in person or online, between December 2021 and August 2022.
Results: 343 responses were obtained. Fifty-one percent of the sample were specialists with more than two years of experience. 37.2% of the residents were in their third year and 20.2% were in their second year. More than half of the respondents did not and do not receive any education on the subject. A gap in knowledge and implementation were identified. The entire sample did not recognize any maternal or neonatal benefit. 86.3% considered that there is no contraindication to the implementation of respectful and dignified childbirth and 94.8% expressed a correlation between misinformation and low implementation of respectful and dignified childbirth. 69.4% of the sample were aware of and implemented the birth plan in their daily practice.
Conclusions: From the sample analyzed, it is concluded that there is misinformation about the maternal and neonatal benefits of dignified and respectful childbirth on the part of Gynaecology and Obstetrics residents and specialists. Therefore, it is necessary to increase the content of the subject in education programs. In addition, it is necessary to standardize adjusted protocols that facilitate their execution and implementation.

REFERENCES

1. Organización Mundial de La Salud. Recomendacionesde la OMS Para los cuidados durante el parto, para unaexperiencia de parto positiva: OMS, 2018. https://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/handle/10665/272435/WHO-RHR-18.12-spa.pdf

2. Fundación Juan Vives Suriá, Defensoría del Pueblo. El partoy nacimiento humanizado como un derecho humano undesafío para la transformación social, 2012. https://www.corteidh.or.cr/tablas/r37546.pdf

3. Jiménez-Hernández GE, Peña Jaramillo YM. Adherencia alas recomendaciones de la OMS en la atención del partoy nacimiento humanizado. Medellín, Colombia. Rev UnivInd Santander Salud 2018; 50 (4): 320-27. http://dx.doi.org/10.18273/revsal.v50n4-2018005

4. Organización Mundial de la Salud (OMS), Materno y reciénnacido Unidad de Salud / Maternidad Segura. Cuidados enel parto normal: una práctica Guía. Ginebra, Suiza: OMS,1996. https://www.elpartoesnuestro.es/sites/default/files/recursos/documents/oms_cuidados_parto_normal_guia_practica_1996.pdf

5. Behruzi R, Hatem M, Goulet L, et al. The facilitating factorsand barriers encountered in the adoption of a humanizedbirth care approach in a highly specialized university affiliatedhospital. BMC Women's Health 2011: 53-11. http://www.biomedcentral.com/1472-6874/11/53

6. Proyecto de Ley 063 del 2017 Congreso de la República deColombia. 2017. http://leyes.senado.gov.co/proyectos/index.php/textos-radicados-senado/p-ley-2017-2018/903-proyecto-de-ley-063-de-2017

7. Ley No. 2244 “Por medio de la cual se reconocen los derechosde la mujer en embarazo, trabajo de "parto, partoy posparto y se dictan otras disposiciones o "ley de partodigno, respetado y humanizado". 2022. Congreso de laRepública de Colombia. https://dapre.presidencia.gov.co/normativa/normativa/LEY%202244%20DE%2011%20DE%20JULIO%20DE%202022.pdf 24 de Julio 2022

8. Hidalgo-Lopezosa, P, Hidalgo-Maestre M, Rodríguez-Borrego MA. Birth plan compliance and its relation tomaternal and neonatal outcomes. Revista Latino-Americanade Enfermagem 2017; 25: e2953. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1518-8345.2007.2953

9. Hidalgo-Lopezosa, P, Cubero-Luna, A. M, Jiménez-Ruz, A,et al. Association between birth plan use and maternaland neonatal outcomes in southern spain: A case-controlstudy. Int J Environ Research Public Health 2021; 18 (2): 1-8.http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1518-8345.2007.2953

10. Hidalgo-Lopezosa P, Rodríguez-Borrego MA, Muñoz-Villanueva MC. Are birth plans associated with improvedmaternal or neonatal outcomes? MCN Am J Matern ChildNurs 2013; 38 (3):150-6. http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/NMC.0b013e31827ea97f

11. Hadar E, Odded R, Gal Bracha, Yogev Y, Melamed N. Obstetricaloutcome in women with self-prepared birth plan.Informa Health Care 2012; 25 (10): 2055-57. http://dx.doi.org/10.3109/14767058.2012.678438

12. Organización Mundial de la Salud. Recomendaciones de laOMS sobre el nacimiento. Fortaleza, Brazil. Lancet, 1985.https://www.ascalema.es/wp-content/uploads/2014/10/OMS.-Recomendaciones-de-la-OMS-sobre-el-nacimiento.-Declaraci%C3%B3n-de-Fortaleza-1985.-Recomendacionesde-la-OMS-para-la-Atenci%C3%B3n-intraparto-1999.pdf

13. Organización Mundial de La Salud. Prevención y erradicaciónde la falta de respeto y el maltrato durante laatención del parto en centros de salud. OMS. 2014. https://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/handle/10665/134590/WHO_RHR_14.23_spa.pdf

14. Conocimientos, actitudes y prácticas relacionadas a laatención de parto humanizado en los profesionales delservicio de gineco-obstetricia del Hospital nacional SergioE. Bernales. Febrero-marzo 2016. URL:https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12672/4741

15. Silva RC, Soares MC, Muniz RM, Andrade FP, Torres AAP,Gomes V. La concepción de los profesionales de saludsobre el parto humanizado en la adolescencia. EnfermGlob 2011; 10 (24): 331-41. https://dx.doi.org/10.4321/S1695-61412011000400025

16. Cáceres-Manrique F de M, Nieves-Cuervo GM. Atenciónhumanizada del parto. Diferencial según condición clínicay social de la materna. Rev Colomb Obstet Ginecol 2017;68 (2): 128-34. https://doi.org/10.18597/rcog.3022