medigraphic.com
ISSN 2992-8036 (Electronic)
ISSN 2306-4102 (Print)
Órgano Oficial del Colegio Mexicano de Ortopedia y Traumatología

2022, Number 5

<< Back Next >>

Acta Ortop Mex 2022; 36 (5)

Dual mobility cup: successes, risks and lessons learned

Gómez-García F

Language: Spanish
References: 21
Page: 308-317
PDF size: 340.75 Kb.


ABSTRACT

A narrative review of the development and evolution to date of the double mobility cups is made, focusing on their successes, failures and teachings. The tools with which we have to prevent and treat prosthetic hip dislocation and the main problems are mentioned. The main objective of this publication is to make reflections and comments about what we should be attentive to in a world of designs that currently exist in the market with a diversity of designs, materials, alloys, types of polyethylene, etc. Some models are found to obtain a stable long-term fixation, the problem that potentially represents the different contemporary models of double mobility and their clinical results. The previous points are discussed and commented and conclusions and recommendations were reached.


REFERENCES

  1. Guo L, Yang Y, An B, Yang Y, Shi L, Han X, et al. Risk factors for dislocation after revision total hip arthroplasty: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Surg. 2017; 38: 123-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2016.12.122.

  2. Werner BC, Brown TE. Instability after total hip arthroplasty. World J Orthop. 2012; 3(8): 122-30.

  3. Lewallen DG. Acetabular cup and liner options. Orthop Proc. 2018; 99-B(Supp 7): 12-3.

  4. Mancino F, Jones CW, Sculco TP, Sculco PK, Maccauro G, De Martino I. Survivorship and clinical outcomes of constrained acetabular liners in primary and revision total hip arthroplasty: a systematic review. J Arthroplasty. 2021; 36(8): 3028-41. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2021.04.028.

  5. Bensen AS, Jakobsen T, Krarup N. Dual mobility cup reduces dislocation and re-operation when used to treat displaced femoral neck fractures. Int Orthop. 2014; 38(6): 1241-5. doi: 10.1007/s00264-013-2276-8.

  6. Garbuz DS, Masri BA, Duncan CP, Greidanus NV, Bohm ER, Petrak MJ, et al. The Frank Stinchfield Award: Dislocation in revision THA: do large heads (36 and 40 mm) result in reduced dislocation rates in a randomized clinical trial? Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2012; 470(2): 351-6. doi: 10.1007/s11999-011-2146-x.

  7. Bousquet G, Argenson C, Godeneche JL, Cisterne JP, Gazielly DF, Girardin P, et al. Recovery after aseptic loosening of cemented total hip arthroplasties with Bousquet's cementless prosthesis. Apropos of 136 cases. Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot. 1986; 72 Suppl 2: 70-4.

  8. Small SR, Berend ME, Howard LA, Rogge RD, Buckley CA, Ritter MA. High initial stability in porous titanium acetabular cups: a biomechanical study. J Arthroplasty. 2013; 28(3): 510-6. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2012.07.035.

  9. Manley MT, Capello WN, D'Antonio JA, Edidin AA, Geesink RG. Fixation of acetabular cups without cement in total hip arthroplasty. A comparison of three different implant surfaces at a minimum duration of follow-up of five years. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1998; 80(8): 1175-85.

  10. Netter JD, Hermida JC, Chen PC, Nevelos JE, D'Lima DD. Effect of microseparation and third-body particles on dual-mobility crosslinked hip liner wear. J Arthroplasty. 2014; 29(9): 1849-53. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2014.04.010.

  11. Malatray M, Roux JP, Gunst S, Pibarot V, Wegrzyn J. Highly crosslinked polyethylene: a safe alternative to conventional polyethylene for dual mobility cup mobile component. A biomechanical validation. Int Orthop. 2017; 41(3): 507-12. doi: 10.1007/s00264-016-3334-9.

  12. De Martino I, D'Apolito R, Soranoglou VG, Poultsides LA, Sculco PK, Sculco TP. Dislocation following total hip arthroplasty using dual mobility acetabular components: a systematic review. Bone Joint J. 2017; 99-B(A Suppl 1): 18-24. Erratum in: Bone Joint J. 2017; 99-B(5): 702-4.

  13. Insull PJ, Cobbett H, Frampton CM, Munro JT. The use of a lipped acetabular liner decreases the rate of revision for instability after total hip replacement: a study using data from the New Zealand Joint Registry. Bone Joint J. 2014; 96-B(7): 884-8. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.96B7.33658.

  14. Yoshimine F. The safe-zones for combined cup and neck anteversions that fulfill the essential range of motion and their optimum combination in total hip replacements. J Biomech. 2006; 39(7): 1315-23. doi: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2005.03.008.

  15. Crowninshield RD, Maloney WJ, Wentz DH, Humphrey SM, Blanchard CR. Biomechanics of large femoral heads: what they do and don't do. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2004; (429): 102-7.

  16. Kluess D, Martin H, Mittelmeier W, Schmitz KP, Bader R. Influence of femoral head size on impingement, dislocation and stress distribution in total hip replacement. Med Eng Phys. 2007; 29(4): 465-71.

  17. Pituckanotai K, Arirachakaran A, Tuchinda H, Putananon C, Nualsalee N, Setrkraising K, et al. Risk of revision and dislocation in single, dual mobility and large femoral head total hip arthroplasty: systematic review and network meta-analysis. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. 2018; 28(3): 445-55. doi: 10.1007/s00590-017-2073-y.

  18. Heffernan C, Banerjee S, Nevelos J, Macintyre J, Issa K, Markel DC, et al. Does dual-mobility cup geometry affect posterior horizontal dislocation distance? Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2014; 472(5): 1535-44. doi: 10.1007/s11999-014-3469-1.

  19. Nevelos J, Johnson A, Heffernan C, Macintyre J, Markel DC, Mont MA. What factors affect posterior dislocation distance in THA? Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2013; 471(2): 519-26. doi: 10.1007/s11999-012-2559-1.

  20. Rubalcava J, Gómez-García F, Ríos-Reina JL. Ángulo de anteversión acetabular de la cadera en población adulta mexicana medida por tomografía computada. Acta Ortop Mex. 2012; 26(3): 155-61.

  21. Australian Orthopaedic Association National Joint Replacement Registry 2020 Annual Report: 173-178. Available in: https://aoanjrr.sahmri.com/annual-reports-2020




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com