medigraphic.com

2022, Number 2

<< Back

Revista Colombiana de Bioética 2022; 17 (2)

Empirical bioethics and human enhancement: a methodological proposal

Gayozzo P

Language: Spanish
References: 42
Page:
PDF size: 170.97 Kb.


ABSTRACT

Purpose/Background. The present research focuses on the debate on transhumanism/ bioconservatism from the perspective of empirical bioethics, that is, making use of empirical evidence in the process of moral reasoning. Its objective is to propose a methodological guide for the approach and resolution of moral problems concerning human enhancement.
Methodology/Approach. The method Step-wise Ethical Human Enhancemet (SWEH) is proposed. It is a guide consisting of 11 questions that are the result of the adaptation of the guidelines for identifying a human enhancement procedure as ethical developed by Julian Savulescu to the method of Step-wise Empirical Contributions elaborated by Pascal Borry. An applicative example on the morality of biohacking RFID implants is provided.
Results/Findings. SWEH proposes that human enhancement procedures might be approached as specific problems and that the identified moral norm might be rewritten as a descriptive proposition that serves as a hypothesis that will be evaluated in the light of empirical evidence. The evaluation of the proposition, and thus of moral reasoning, will be done with the help of the information gathered by the 11 questions.
Discussion/Conclusions/Contributions. SWEH can serve to provide a first answer on the morality of a specific human enhancement procedure, but not an absolute one, as the result may vary depending on the information obtained in the future. It also highlights gaps in empirical research related to the procedure it addresses. The method is a first methodological guide that could be revised and improved.


REFERENCES

  1. Bauer, Keith. 2007. “Wired Patients: Implantable Microchips and Biosensors in PatientCare.” Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 16, no. 3: 281-290. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0963180107070314

  2. Borry, Pascal, Paul Schotsmans y Kris Dierickx. 2004. “What is the role of empiricalresearch in bioethical reflection and decision-making? An ethical analysis.”Medicine Health Care and Philosophy 7, no. 1: 41-53. https://doi.org/10.1023/b:mhep.0000021844.57115.9d

  3. Borry, Pascal, Paul Schotsmans y Kris Dierickx. 2005. “The Birth of the EmpiricialTurn in Bioethics.” Bioethics 19, no. 1: 49-71. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8519.2005.00424.x

  4. Bostrom, Nick. 2001. “What is Transhumanism?” https://www.nickbostrom.com/old/transhumanism.html

  5. Bostrom, Nick. 2005. “A History of Transhumanist Thought.” Journal of Evolutionand Technology 14, no. 1. https://www.nickbostrom.com/papers/history.pdf

  6. Bostrom, Nick. 2005. “Transhumanist Values.” Journal of Philosophical Research 30:3-14. https://doi.org/10.5840/jpr_2005_26

  7. Bunge, Mario. 1989. “Treatise on Basic Philosophy.” En Ethics: The Good and The Right,editado por Mario Bunge. Holanda: MTP Press. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-2601-1

  8. Bunge, Mario. 2006. A la caza de la realidad. Barcelona: Gedisa.

  9. Bunge, Mario. 2007. “The Ethics of Science and the Science of Ethics.” En Scienceand Ethics, editado por Paul Kurtz, 27-42. New York: Prometheus Books.

  10. Coenen, Christopher. 2017. “Biohacking: New Do-It-Yourself Practices as TechnoscientificWork between Freedom and Necessity.” Proceedings 1, no. 3: 256.https://doi.org/10.3390/is4si-2017-04119

  11. Coenen, Christopher, Mirjam Schuijff y Martijntje Smits. 2011. “The Politics of HumanEnhancement and the European Union.” En Enhancing Human Capacities,editado por Julian Savulescu, Ruud ter Meulen y Guy Kahane, 521-535. WestSussex: Wiley-Blackwell. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/9781444393552.ch37

  12. Davies, Rachel, Jonathan Ives y Michael Dunn. 2015. “A systematic review ofempirical bioethics methodologies.” BMC Medical Ethics 16, no. 1. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12910-015-0010-3

  13. Dugin, Alexander. 2016. “Transhumanismo.” https://www.geopolitica.ru/es/directives/transhumanismo

  14. Fukuyama, Francis. 2003. Our Posthuman Future: Consequences of the BiotechnologyRevolution. New York: Picador.

  15. Gayozzo, Piero. 2019. “¿Qué es el Transhumanismo?” Instituto de Extrapolítica yTranshumanismo 2, no. 1. https://doi.org/10.52749/iet.v2i1.9

  16. Gayozzo, Piero. 2020. “La Cuarta Revolución Industrial: una revolución venidera.”Futuro Hoy 1, no. 1: 11-13. https://doi.org/10.52749/fh.v1i1.2

  17. Gayozzo, Piero. 2021. “Biohacking: el transhumanismo de garaje.” Revista Iberoamericanade Bioética 16: 1-17. https://doi.org/10.14422/rib.i16.y2021.002

  18. Haddara, Moutaz y Anna Staaby. 2018. “RFID Applications and Adoptions inHealthcare: A Review on Patient Safety.” Procedia Computer Science 138: 80-88.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2018.10.012

  19. Harris, Sam. 2010. The Moral Landscape: How Science Can Determine Human Values.Nueva York: Free Press.

  20. Hofmann, Bjørn. 2017. “Limits to human enhancement: nature, disease, therapyor betterment?” BMC Medical Ethics 18, no. 56. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12910-017-0215-8

  21. Hughes, James. 2012. “The Politics of Transhumanism and the Techno-MillennialImagination 1626-2030.” Zygon, Journal of Religion y Science 47, no. 4: 757-776.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9744.2012.01289.x

  22. Huxley, Julian. 1957. New Bottles for New Wines. Londres: Chatto y Windus.

  23. Huxtable, Richard y Jonathan Ives. 2019. “Mapping, framing, shaping: a frameworkfor empirical bioethics research projects.” BMC Medical Ethics 20, no.86. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12910-019-0428-0

  24. Ives, Jonathan, Michael Dunn y Alan Cribb. 2017. Empirical Bioethics. Cambridge,Reino Unido: Cambridge University Press.

  25. Ives, Jonathan, Michael Dunn, Bert Molewijk, Jan Schildmann, Kristine Bærøe,Lucy Frith, Richard Huxtable, et al. 2018. “Standards of practice in empiricalbioethics research: towards a consensus.” BMC Medical Ethics 19, no. 68. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12910-018-0304-3

  26. Kent, Chloe. 2020. “From Grinders to Biohackers: where medical technologymeets body modification.” https://www.medicaldevice-network.com/features/medical-biohacking/

  27. Kiourti, Asimina. 2018. “RFID Antennas for Body-Area Applications: From Wearablesto Implants.” IEEE Antennas y Propagation Magazine 60, no. 5: 14-25.https://doi.org/10.1109/MAP.2018.2859167

  28. Kurtz, Paul. 2007. “What is the Relationship among Science, Reason and Ethics?” EnScience and Ethics, editado por Paul Kurtz, 11-26. Nueva York: Prometheus Books.

  29. Lin, Patrick y Fritz Allhoff. 2008. “Against Unrestricted Human Enhancement.” Journalof Evolution and Technology 18, no. 1: 35-41. http://jetpress.org/v18/linallhoff.htm

  30. More, Max. 1998. “The Extropian Principles v. 3.0. A Transhumanist Declaration.”https://mrob.com/pub/religion/extro_prin.html

  31. Pugh, Jonathan, Guy Kahane y Julian Savulescu. 2016. “Bioconservatism, Partiality,and the Human-Nature Objection to Enhancement.” The Monist 99, no. 4:406-422. https://doi.org/10.1093/monist/onw013

  32. Purdy, Laura. 2007. “The Science of Ethics.” En Science and Ethics, editado por PaulKurtz, 266-273. Nueva York: Prometheus Book.

  33. Savulescu, Julian. 2002. “Abortion, embryo destruction and the future of value argument.”Journal of Medical Ethics 28, no. 3: 133-135. https://doi.org/10.1136/jme.28.3.133

  34. Savulescu, Julian. 2005. “New breeds of humans: The moral obligation to enhance.”Reproductive Biomedicine Online 10: 36-39. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1472-6483(10)62202-X

  35. Savulescu, Julian. 2007. “Genetic Interventions and The Ethics of Enhancement ofHuman Beings.” En The Oxford Handbook of Bioethics, editado por Bonnie Steinbock,526-535. Nueva York: Oxford University Press.

  36. Schiffmann, Alain, Martin Clauss y Philipp Honingmann. 2020. “Biohackers andSelf-Made Problems: Infection of an Implanted RFID/NFC Chip.” JBJS CaseConnector 10, no, 2: e0399. https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.CC.19.00399

  37. Silva Céspedes, Julio. 2021. “Una propuesta de objetivismo ético para contrarrestarla posverdad en la era de la Cuarta Revolución Industrial.” Futuro Hoy 2, no.1: 25-27. https://doi.org/10.52749/fh.v2i1.7

  38. Sparrow, Robert. 2015. “Enhancement and Obsolescence: Avoiding an “EnhancedRat Race”.” Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 25, no. 3: 231-260. https://doi.org/10.1353/ken.2015.0015

  39. Strech, Daniel, Matthis Synofzik y Georg Marckmann. 2008. “Systematic reviewsof empirical bioethics.” Journal of Medical Ethics 34, no. 6: 472-477. http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/jme.2007.021709

  40. Vita-More, Natasha. 2012. “An Introduction to Transhumanity.” Issues 98. http://www.issuesmagazine.com.au/article/issue-march-2012/introduction-transhumanity.html

  41. Werber, Borut, Alenka Baggia y Anja Žnidarši. 2018. “Factors Affecting the Intentionsto Use RFID Subcutaneous Microchip Implants for Healthcare Purposes.”Organizacija 51: 121-134. https://doi.org/10.2478/orga-2018-0010

  42. Yetisen, Ali. 2018. “Biohacking.” Trends in Biotechnology 36: 744-747. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tibtech.2018.02.011




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com