medigraphic.com
ISSN 2992-8559 (Electronic)
ISSN 1405-0625 (Print)

2003, Number 2

<< Back Next >>

Cir Plast 2003; 13 (2)

Changes in intraabdominal pressure and respiratory function post abdominoplasty

Anguiano YR, López PS, Saucedo OJA, Velarde HE, Trigos MI

Language: Spanish
References: 21
Page: 56-60
PDF size: 60.36 Kb.


ABSTRACT

To correct abdominal wall functional and aesthetic abnormalities, several techniques that can produce intraabdominal pressure changes with respiratory capability consequences have been used. For this study 11 female patients, with 37.9 years old average, 1.58 meters tall and body corporal mass of 24.8 were included. The muscular plicature average was 5.8 centimeters. Intraabdominal pressure raised an average of 2,32 water cm before sugery, 5.4 during the muscular plicature and 7.7 cm when the skin was sutured. The vital capacity in liters before surgery was 3.23 and after was 2.7 with a percentage of 94 before and 77.6 after. The breathing volume forced in the first second was 2.66 before and 2.65 liters after surgery. The abdominal plicature produces a significant increase of the intraabdominal pressure, altering the vital capacity and the respiratory mechanism.


REFERENCES

  1. Nahas FX, Augusto SM. Should diastasis recti be corrected? Aest Plast Surg 1997; 21: 285-9.

  2. Munegato PG. Hemodynamic alterations during massive incisional hernioplasty. J Am.Coll Surg 1995; 181: 299-302.

  3. Hunter GR, Crapo RO. Pulmonary complications following abdominal lipectomy. Plast Reconstr Surg 1983; 3: 71-3.

  4. Obeid F, Fath AS. Increases in intrabdominal pressure affect pulmonary compliance. Arch Surg 1995; 130: 544-48.

  5. Pitanguy I. Abdominal lipectomy an approach to it through an analysis of 300 consecutive cases. Plast Reconstr Surg 1967; 40: 384-9.

  6. Grazer FM, Goldwyn RM. Abdominoplasty assesed by a survey with emphasis on complications. Plast Reconstr Surg 1977; 59: 513-5.

  7. Ubliglia GP, Pastacaldi P. Nuovo metodo di abdominoplastica estetica. Riv Ital Chir Plast 1977: 9: 257-8.

  8. Ston A. High lateral tension abdominoplasty. Plastic Reconstr Surg 1996; 78: 345-47.

  9. Appiani E. Muscular plastic for Aesthetic conformation of abdominal girde. Ann Plast Surg 1984; 13(2): 97-106.

  10. Marquez A, Dominguez A. Abdominoplasty with two fusiform plications. Aesth Plast Surg 1996; 20: 2499-51.

  11. Al Catan MM. Abdominoplasty in multiparus women with severe musculoaponeurotic laxity. Br Plast Surg 1997; 50: 450-55.

  12. Avelar J. Fat succion versus abdominoplasty. Aesth Plast Surg 1985; 9: 265-75.

  13. Bozola AR, Psilliakis JM. Abdominoplasty. A new concep and classifications treatment. Plast Reconstr Surg 1988; 82: 983-93.

  14. Rizzo A, Davis PC. Intraoperative vesical pressure measurements as a guide in de closure of abdominal wall defects. J Am Coll Surg 1996; 62: 1992-7.

  15. Sugerman A, Windsor M. Intrabdominal pressure, Sagital abdominal diameter and obesity comorbidity. J Inter Med 1997; 241: 71-9.

  16. Marín VJA. Control del grado de plicatura del sistema músculo aponeurótico del abdomen mediante el control de la presión intraabdominal. Tesis de Especialización en Cirugía Plástica. Hospital de Especialidades del Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social. Febrero del 2000. Guadalajara, Jalisco.

  17. Jasen DA, Kaye AD, Banister R, Madan A, Hyde K, Nossaman B. Changes in compliance predict pulmonary morbity in patients undergoing abdominal plication. Past Reconstr Surg 1999; 103: 2012-15.

  18. Matarasso A. Abdominoplasty. Clin Plast Surg 1998; 16(2): 289-303.

  19. Schein M, Wittmann DH. The abdominal compartment syndrome: The physiological and clinical consequences of elevated intra-abdominal pressure. J Am Coll Surg 1995; 180: 745-51.

  20. Burch JM, Moore EE. The abdominal compartment syndrome. Surg Clin Nort Am 1996; 76(4): 833-8.

  21. Daniel R, Meldrum D, Denver FA. Prospective characterization and selective management of the abdominal compartment syndrome. J Am Surg 1997; 174: 676-83.




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com