medigraphic.com
ISSN 2307-2113 (Electronic)
Revista Cubana de Información en Ciencias de la Salud (ACIMED)

2021, Number 3

<< Back Next >>

Revista Cubana de Información en Ciencias de la Salud (ACIMED) 2021; 32 (3)

Integration of Charles Peirce's philosophy into information science

Puerta-Díaz M, Manhique ILE, de Castro SCH, Martínez-Ávila D

Language: Spanish
References: 30
Page: 1-29
PDF size: 1010.56 Kb.


ABSTRACT

The purpose of the study was to understand the integration of Charles Peirce's philosophy into information science. From a methodological point of view, it is a qualitative and quantitative study based on bibliometric techniques. The bibliographic data were obtained from four databases, two specifically related to information sciences: ProQuest - LISA Information Sciences Libraries and Abstracts, and the reference database for articles from information sciences journals; and two multidisciplinary databases: Scopus and Web of Science. Results show that Peircean philosophy is gradually consolidating as an important theoretical contribution in information sciences studies and publications, considering the relatively significant number (114) of publications retrieved from the aforementioned databases. These studies address pragmatism in research about knowledge management, information systems, information philosophy and knowledge organization, particularly as related to understanding or the inferential indexing process in information systems. The article concludes that there is a growing interest by the information sciences scientific community to develop Peirce's philosophy in a holistic manner, not limited to the first level of Peircean semiotics and speculative grammar, for it also includes studies dealing with inference, a process related to pure logic.


REFERENCES

  1. Saracevic T. Interdisciplinary nature of information science. Ciência da informação. 1995 [02/12/2020];24(1). Disponible en: Disponible en: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/

  2. Barros C, Café L. Semiótica na Ciência da Informação: relatos de interdisciplinaridade. Perspectivas em Ciência da Informação. 2012 [acceso: 17/08/2020];18(3):18-33. Disponible en: Disponible en: https://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1413-99362012000300003

  3. Peirce CS. Como tornar as nossas ideias claras. Popular Science Monthly. 1878 [acceso: 17/08/2020];Collected Papers V. p. 388-410.

  4. Peirce CS. A fixação da crença. Popular Science Monthly. 1877 [acceso: 17/08/2020];12:1-15. Disponible en: Disponible en: https://www.google.com/

  5. Almeida CC. The Methodological Influence of Peirce’s Pragmatism on Knowledge Organization. Knowledge Organization. 2012 [acceso: 17/08/2020];39:204-15. Disponible en: Disponible en: https://web.a.ebscohost.com/abstract

  6. Almeida CC de. A semiótica na Ciência da Informação brasileira: ideias e tendências. In: Encontro Nacional de Pesquisa em Ciência da Informação; 2016. El Salvador: UFBA; 2016.

  7. Brier S. Cybersemiotics: Why information is not enough!. Toronto, Buffalo: University of Toronto Press; 2008.

  8. Thellefsen T. Knowledge Profiling: The basis for knowledge organization. Library Trends. 2004 [acceso: 17/08/2020];52(3):507-14. Disponible en: Disponible en: https://www.ideals.illinois.edu/bitstream/handle/2142/1692/Thellefsen507514.pdf

  9. Ibri IA. Kósmos noetós: a arquitetura de Charles S. Peirce. São Paulo: Perspectiva; 1992.

  10. Silveira LFB. Curso de semiótica Geral. São Paulo: Quartier Latin‬; 2007.

  11. Noth W. Semiótica do Século XX. São Paulo: Annablume; 1996.

  12. Santaella L. O Papel da Mudança de Hábito no Pragmatismo Evolucionista de Peirce. Cognitio. 2004 [acceso: 17/08/2020];5(1):75-83. Disponible en: Disponible en: https://revistas.pucsp.br/cognitiofilosofia/article/view/13210/9731

  13. Santaella L. Epistemologia Semiótica. Cognitio. 2008 [acceso: 17/08/2020];9(1):93-110. Disponible en: Disponible en: https://revistas.pucsp.br/cognitiofilosofia/article/view/13531

  14. Buckland M. Information as a thing. J Am Soc Inform Sci. 1991;42(5):351-60. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-4571(199106)42:5<351::AID-ASI5>3.0.CO;2-3

  15. Thellefsen M. A pragmatic semiotic perspective on the concept of information need. Documento; 2013 [acceso: 02/02/2021]. Disponible en: Disponible en: http://www.nordprag.org/papers/epc1/Thellefsen.pdf

  16. Belkin N, Oddy R, Brooks H. ASK for information retrieval. J Docum. 1982;38(2):61-71. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/eb026726

  17. Dervin B, Nilan M. Information needs and uses. Ann Rev Inform Sci Technol. 1986 [acceso: 02/02/2021];21:3-33. Disponible en: Disponible en: http://pascalfrancis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=7430935

  18. Thellefsen T, Thellefsen M, Sorensen B. The information concept of Nicholas Belkin revisited - some semeiotic comments. J Docum. 2014. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/JD-08-2012-0101

  19. Almeida CC. Sobre o pensamento de Peirce e a organização da informação e do conhecimento. Liinc em revista. 2011 [acceso: 02/02/2021];7(1):104-20. Disponible en: Disponible en: https://repositorio.unesp.br/bitstream/handle/11449/114909/ISSN18083536-2011-07-01-104-120.pdf

  20. Almeida CC, Fujita MSL, Reis DM. Peircean Semiotics and Subject Indexing: Contributions of Speculative Grammar and Pure Logic. UNESP. 2013 [acceso: 02/02/2021];40:225-41. Disponible en: Disponible en: https://repositorio.unesp.br/handle/11449/76267?locale-attribute=es

  21. Hjørland B, Albrechtsen H. Toward a new horizon in information science: Domain‐analysis. J Am Society Inform Sci. 1995;46(6):400-25. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-4571(199507)46:6<400::AID-ASI2>3.0.CO;2-Y

  22. Hjørland B. Domain analysis in information science: eleven approaches-traditional as well as innovative. J docum. 2002;58(4):422-62. DOI: http://www.doi.org/10.1108/00220410210431136

  23. Hjørland B. Domain analysis. Knowl Organiz. 2017 [acceso: 02/02/2021];44(6):436-64. Disponible en: Disponible en: https://www.site.uottawa.ca/~laganier/seg2500/domain

  24. Smiraglia R. Domain analysis for knowledge organization: tools for ontology extraction. Amsterdam: Chandos Publishing; 2015.

  25. Silva AKA. A dinâmica das redes sociais e as redes de coautoria. Perspect Gest Conhec. 2014 [acceso: 02/02/2021];4:27-47. Disponible en: Disponible en: https://periodicos.ufpb.br/index.php/pgc/article/view/21275

  26. Van Eck NJ, Waltman L. VosViewer manual: Manual for VosViewer version 1.6.6. Leiden: CWTS; 2017.

  27. Bardin L. Análise de conteúdo. São Paulo: Edições; 2011.

  28. Price DS. A General Theory of Bibliometric and Other Cumulative Advantage Processes. J Am Soc Inform Sci; 1976 [acceso: 02/02/2021];292-06. DOI: http://www.org/10.1002/asi.4630270505

  29. Crane D. Invisible colleges: diffusion of knowledge in scientific communities. Chicago: University of Chicago Press; 1972.

  30. Thellefsen T, Thellefsen M. Pragmatic semiotics and knowledge organization. Knowl Organiz. 2004[acceso: 18/02/2020];31(3):177-87. Disponible en: Disponible en: https://vbn.aau.dk/en/publications/pragmatic-semiotics-and-knowledge-organization




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com