medigraphic.com
ISSN 1726-6718 (Electronic)
Revista Cubana de Anestesiología y Reanimación

2021, Number 3

<< Back Next >>

Revista Cubana de Anestesiología y Reanimación 2021; 20 (3)

Improved recovery protocols in cardiac surgery: Systematic review with metaanalysis of randomized clinical trails

Agüero MMO, Dorado CB, Valdés OM

Language: Spanish
References: 34
Page: 1-20
PDF size: 596.65 Kb.


ABSTRACT

Introduction: Multiple efforts are made to include improved recovery protocols as an indicator of quality in care for surgical patients, under the premise of accelerating the recovery of patients, without this being detrimental to the care process, and thus guarantee high patient satisfaction. In view of this, the development of research supported by the best scientific and practical evidence is necessary.
Objective: To estimate, through the published literature, the effectiveness of the application of early recovery protocols on the perioperative evolution of patients who undergo cardiac surgical procedures.
Method: Randomized controlled clinical trials, published between January 2013 and May 2020, were included. The systematic review was carried out according to the recommendations of the Cochrane Library manual 5.1.0 for reviewers.
Results: Six studies were analyzed (687 patients/study group: 345, control group: 342). The methodological quality of most of the researches assessed was good. A superiority of the protocols is shown, since they are accompanied by a decrease in the incidence of perioperative complications (RR=0.61 [0.40, 0.93]). Similarly, they are related to the decrease in hospital stay (mean difference, random effect, was -2.98 [-3.31, -2.65]).
Conclusions: Despite the few studies included, the evidence suggests that these programs improve the perioperative outcome of patients.


REFERENCES

  1. Yang L, Kaye AD, Venakatesh AG, Green MS, Asgarian CD, Luedi MM, et al. Enhanced recovery after cardiac surgery: An update on clinical implicactions. Int Anesthesiol Clin. 2017;55(4):148-62. https://doi.org/10.1097/FAIA0000000000000168

  2. Melnyk M, Casey RG, Black P, Koupparis AJ. Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocols: Time to change practice? Can Urol Assoc J. 2012;5(4):342-8. https://doi.org/10.5489/FCUAJ.11002

  3. Lujungqvist O, Scott M, Fearon KC. Enhanced recovery after surgery: A review. JAMA Surgery. 2017;1-7. https://doi.org/10.1001/Fjamasurg.2016.4952

  4. Che G, Liu L, Zhou Q. Enhanced recovery after surgery from theory to practice what do we need to do?]. Zhongguo Fei Ai Za Zhi. 2017[acceso: 05/05/2018];20(4):219-25. Disponible en: Disponible en: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/28442009/

  5. Lau CS, Chanberlain RS. Enhanced Recovery After surgery programms improve patient outcomes and recovery: A Meta-analysis. World J Surg. 2017;41:899-913. https://doi.org/10.1007/Fs00268-016-3807-4

  6. Varelmann D, Shook D, Buric D, Yadzchi F, Dinga I, Madou K. et al. Enhanced recovery after cardiac surgery: fluid balance and incidence of acute kidney injury. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2019[acceso: 14/11/2019];33:140-68. Disponible en: Disponible en: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S1053077019306548

  7. Anastasiadis K, Asterious C, Antonitsis P, Agiriadou H, Konstantinou D, Tossios P. Enhanced recovery after elective coronary revascularization surgery with minimal versus conventional extracorporeal circulation: a prospective randomized study. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2013;27(5):859-64. https://dx.doi.org/10.1053/j.jvca.2013.01.010

  8. Man Li, Junjie Zhang, Tong J Gan, Gang Qin, Lu Wang, Maoen Zhu, et al. Enhanced recovery after surgery pathway for patients undergoing cardiac surgery: a randomized clinical trial. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2018;54(3). https://doi.org/10.1093/ejcts/ezy100

  9. Baxter R, Squiers J, Conner W, Kent M, Lobdell DK, DiMaio M. Enhanced recovery after surgery: A narrative review of its application in cardiac surgery. The Annals of Thoracic Surgery. 2019. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.athoracsur.2019.11.008Get rights and content

  10. Agüero MO. Protocolos de recuperación precoz en cirugía cardiaca? Utopía o realidad? Rev Cub Anest Rean. 2018[acceso: 26/12/2019];17(2). Disponible en: Disponible en: http://revanestesia.sld.cu/index.php/anestRean/article/view/415/375

  11. Ljungqvist O, Young-Fadok T, Demartines N. The history of enhanced recovery after surgery and the ERAS society. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2017[acceso: 05/05/2018];27(9):860-2. Disponible en: Disponible en: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/28795858/

  12. Senturk JC, Kristo G, Gold J, Bleday R, Whang E. The development of enhanced recovery after surgery across surgical specialties. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2017[acceso: 05/05/2018];27(9):863-70. Disponible en: Disponible en: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/28795911/

  13. Engelman D, Walid Ben A, Judson BW, Perraul L, Seenu Reddy V, Rakesh CA, et al. Guidelines for perioperative care in cardiac surger y enhanced recover y after surgery society Recommendations. JAMA Surgery. 2019;1-12. https://doi.org/10.1001/Fjamasurg.2019.1153

  14. Roulin D, Najjar P, Demartines N. Enhanced recovery after surgery implementation: From planning to success. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech. 2017;27(9):876-79. https://doi:10.1089/lap.2017.0347

  15. Abeles A, Kwasnicki RM, Darzi A. Enhanced recovery after surgery: Current research insights and future direction. World J Gastrointest Surg. 2017;9(2):37-45. https://doi.org/10.4240/Fwjgs.v9.i2.37

  16. Soeters PB. The enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) program: benefit and concerns. Am J Clin Nutr. 2017;106:110-1. https://doi.org/10.3945/Fajcn.117.159897

  17. Ferreira GI, Urrutia G, Alonso CP. Revisiones sistemáticas y metaanálisis: bases conceptuales e interpretación. Rev Esp Cardiol. 2011[acceso: 16/05/2018];64(8):688-96. Disponible en: Disponible en: http://www.revespcardiol.org/es/revisiones-sistematicas-metaanalisis-bases-conceptuales/articulo/90024424/

  18. Catalá- LF, Tobías A, Roqué M . Conceptos básicos del metanálisis en red. Atención Primaria. 2014[acceso: 16/05/2018];46(10):573-81. Disponible en: Disponible en: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0212656714001218

  19. Schulte K, Antoniou A, Attia R. Does fast-track recovery improve outcomes in adult cardiac surgery? Ann Cardiol Vasc Med. 2018[acceso: 26/09/2018];3:1012. Disponible en: Disponible en: http://meddocsonline.org

  20. Lena P, Balarac N, Lena D, De La Chapelle A, Arnulf J-J, Mihoubi A, et al. Fast-track anesthesia with remifentanil and spinal analgesia for cardiac surgery: the effect on pain control and quality of recovery. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2008[acceso: 06/08/2010];22(4):536-42. Disponible en: Disponible en: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/18662627/

  21. Hejimans JH. Fast track minimally invasive aortic valve surgery: patient selection and optimizing. Eur Heart J Suppl. 2017;19(sppl A 1):A8-14. https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/suw056

  22. Agüero MO. Métodos anestésicos multimodales en el procedimiento quirúrgico de revascularización miocárdica sin circulación extracorpórea. Ensayo clínico aleatorizado y metanálisis. Hospital Clínico Quirúrgico Hermanos Ameijeiras]: Universidad de Ciencias Médicas de la Habana; 2012[acceso: 23/01/2018]. Disponible en: Disponible en: http://tesis.sld.cu/index.php?P=FullRecord&ID=306

  23. Higgins JPT, Green S. Handbook for Systematic reviews of interventions 5.1.0. 2011[acceso: 08/03/2018]. Disponible en: Disponible en: http://handbook.cochrane.org .

  24. Higgins JPT, Altman GD, Jonathan AC. Assessing risk of bias in included studies. En: Cochrane handbook for systematic review of interventions Version 510. The Cochrane Collaborations. 2011[acceso: 02/08/2017]. Disponible en: Disponible en: https://www.cochrane-handbook.org

  25. Deeks JJ, Higgins JPT, Altman DG. Analysing data and undertaking meta- analysis. En: Cochrane Handbook for systematic Review of interventions Version 510. The Cochrane Collaborations. 2011[acceso: 01/06/2017]. Disponible en: Disponible en: https://www.cochrane-handbook.org

  26. Tian GJ, Li DY, Yu HB, Dong YD, Peng YN, Liu P, et al. Clinical efficacy of enhanced recovery after surgery in atrial caval shunting for type Ⅱ Budd-Chiari syndrome. Zhonghua Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2017[acceso: 07/06/2013];55(9):671-7. Disponible en: Disponible en: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/28870052/

  27. Osawa EA, Rhodes MA, Landoni G, Galas FR, Fukushima JT, Park CJ, et al. Effect of Perioperative Goal-Directed Hemodynamic Resuscitation Therapy on Outcomes Following Cardiac Surgery: A Randomized Clinical Trial and Systematic Review. Crit Care Med J. 2016;44(4). https://doi.org/10.1097/FCCM.0000000000001479

  28. Mijovski G, Podbregar M, Kšela J, Jenko M, Šoštarič M. Effectiveness of wound infusion of 0.2% ropivacaine by patient control analgesia pump after minithoracotomy aortic valve replacement: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. BMC Anesthesiology. 2020;20:172. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12871-020-01093-9

  29. Cameron M, Tam K, Wahaibi K, Charghi R, Beique F. Intraoperative ketamine for analagesia post-coronary artery bypass surgery: A randomized, controlled double-blind clinical trial. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2019;34:586-91. https://doi.org/10.1053/j.jvca.2019.10.010

  30. Haris SV, Martí-Carvajal A, Salanti G. El papel de las revisiones sistemáticas en anestesiología basada en la evidencia. Rev colomb anestesiol. 2011[acceso: 07/07/2019];39(2). Disponible en: Disponible en: http://www.scielo.org.co/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0120-33472011000200002

  31. Hutton B, Catala LF, Moher D. La extensión de la declaración PRISMA para revisiones sistemáticas que incorporan metanálisis en red: PRISMA-NMA. Med Clin. 2016 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.medcli.2016.02025

  32. CONSORT 2010 Statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomized trials. Equator Networt. 2010[acceso: 02/04/2018]. Disponible en: Disponible en: https://www.equator-network.org/reporting-guidelines/consort/

  33. Jadad AR, Moore RD, Carroll DD, Jenkinson C, Reynolds D, Gavaghan D. Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials: Is Blinding Necessary? Controlled Clinical Trials. 1996[acceso: 29/06/2018];17(1);1-12. Disponible en: Disponible en: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/0197245695001344 .

  34. Pértega DS, Pita FS. Revisiones sistemáticas y metanálisis. Fisterra.com - Atención Primaria en la Red. 2006[acceso: 02/04/2019]. Disponible en: Disponible en: https://www.fisterra.com/mbe/investiga/metaanalisis/rsymetaanalisis.asp




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com