medigraphic.com
Organo Oficial de la Sociedad Mexicana de Urología

2022, Number 6

<< Back Next >>

Rev Mex Urol 2022; 82 (6)

Presence of lithiasis in a series of 2658 functioning kidney grafts. Experience from a single centre

Vázquez-Martul D, López-Fernández A, Lancina-Martín JA, Fernández-Rivera C, Altez-Fernández C, Salgado-Novoa J, Ponce Díaz-Reixa JL, Chantada AV

Language: Spanish
References: 15
Page:
PDF size: 175.10 Kb.


ABSTRACT

Objective: The objective of our study is to find out the data regarding the appearance of renal lithiasis and its characteristics in kidney trans- plant patients with functioning grafts in our centre.
Design: A retrospective study was undertaken of the transplants per- formed in our centre between January 1981 and December 2019. The transplants with functioning grafts and in which lithiasic pathology had been diagnosed were selected. The characteristics of these transplants were collected (location, composition, form of presentation and treat- ment carried out).
Results: 2658 patients with a functioning graft were identified in our centre. A rate of lithiasic pathology of 1.8% was reported. Among them, 44% were located in the lower calyx. Regarding the composition, cal- cium was observed in 45.4% of cases.
Limitations: It is important to highlight that our study is observational and retrospective, with all the limitations on validity that this entails.
Originality: Our series is the largest study reported to date of lithiasic pathology in kidney transplantation. It is also important to highlight that the data was extracted taking only functioning grafts into account.
Conclusions: The incidence of appearance of lithiasis is small, but it is a pathology that should be taken into account due to the complications that it can entail. The most frequently observed location in our series was in the lower calyx. Although these results are supported by a large number of cases, more robust studies are needed to confirm them.


REFERENCES

  1. Stravodimos KG, Adamis S, Tyritzis S, Georgios Z, Constantinides CA. Renal transplant lithiasis: analysis of our series and review of the literature. J Endourol. 2012;26(1):38–44. doi: https://doi. org/10.1089/end.2011.0049

  2. Lancina Martín J A, García Buitrón J M, Díaz Bermúdez J, Alvarez Castelo L, Duarte Novo J, Sánchez Merino J M. Litiasis urinaria en riñón trasplantado. Arch Esp Urol. 1997;50(2):141– 50.

  3. Rosenberg JC, Arnstein AR, Ing TS, Pierce JM, Rosenberg B, Silva Y, et al. Calculi complicatinga renal transplant. The American Journal of Surgery. 1975;129(3):326–30. doi: https://doi. org/10.1016/0002-9610(75)90251-2

  4. Malheiro J, Almeida M, Fonseca I, Martins LS, Pedroso S, Dias L, et al. Hyperuricemia in Adult Renal Allograft Recipients: Prevalence and Predictors. Transplantation Proceedings. 2012;44(8):2369–72. doi: https://doi. org/10.1016/j.transproceed.2012.07.033

  5. Branchereau J, Thuret R, Kleinclauss F, Timsit M-O. Lithiase urinaire chez le patient transplanté rénal. Progrès en Urologie. 2016;26(15):1083–7. doi: https://doi. org/10.1016/j.purol.2016.08.012

  6. Challacombe B, Dasgupta P, Tiptaft R, Glass J, Koffman G, Goldsmith D, et al. Multimodal management of urolithiasis in renal transplantation. BJU Int. 2005;96(3):385– 9. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1464- 410x.2005.05636.x

  7. Bhadauria RPS, Ahlawat R, Kumar V, Srinadh ES, Banerjee GK, Bhandari M. Donor-Gifted Allograft Lithiasis: Extracorporeal Shockwave Lithotripsy with Over Table Module Using the Lithostar Plus. Urol Int. 1995;55(1):51–5. doi: https://doi.org/10.1159/000282750

  8. Verrier C, Bessede T, Hajj P, Aoubid L, Eschwege P, Benoit G. Decrease in and Management of Urolithiasis After Kidney Transplantation. Journal of Urology. 2012;187(5):1651–5. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2011.12.060

  9. Scales CD, Smith AC, Hanley JM, Saigal CS. Prevalence of Kidney Stones in the United States. European Urology. 2012;62(1):160–5. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2012.03.052

  10. Harper JM, Samuell CT, Hallson PC, Wood SM, Mansell MA. Risk factors for calculus formation in patients with renal transplants. British Journal of Urology. 1994;74(2):147–50. doi: https:// doi.org/10.1111/j.1464-410x.1994.tb16576.x

  11. Mamarelis G, Vernadakis S, Moris D, Altanis N, Perdikouli M, Stravodimos K, et al. Lithiasis of the Renal Allograft, A Rare Urological Complication Following Renal Transplantation: A Single-Center Experience of 2045 Renal Transplantations. Transplantation Proceedings. 2014;46(9):3203–5. doi: https://doi. org/10.1016/j.transproceed.2014.09.166

  12. Hyams E, Marien T, Bruhn A, Quirouet A, Andonian S, Shah O, et al. Ureteroscopy for Transplant Lithiasis. Journal of Endourology. 2012;26(7):819–22. doi: https://doi. org/10.1089/end.2011.0495

  13. He Z, Li X, Chen L, Zeng G, Yuan J. Minimally invasive percutaneous nephrolithotomy for upper urinary tract calculi in transplantedkidneys. BJU Int. 2007;99(6):1467–71.doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1464- 410x.2007.06768.x

  14. Ferreira Cassini M, Cologna AJ, Ferreira Andrade M, Lima GJ, Medeiros Albuquerque U, Pereira Martins AC, et al. Lithiasis in 1,313 Kidney Transplants: Incidence, Diagnosis, and Management. Transplantation Proceedings. 2012;44(8):2373–5. doi: https://doi. org/10.1016/j.transproceed.2012.07.052

  15. Burgher A, Beman M, Holtzman JL, MongaM. Progression of Nephrolithiasis: Long- Term Outcomes with Observation of Asymptomatic Calculi. Journal of Endourology. 2004;18(6):534–9. doi: https://doi. org/10.1089/end.2004.18.534




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com