medigraphic.com
ISSN 1608-8921 (Print)

2021, Number 3

<< Back Next >>

Gaceta Médica Espirituana 2021; 23 (3)

New functional appliance options for treating patients with mandibular retrognathia

Verano LL, de la Rosa CY

Language: Spanish
References: 37
Page: 155-167
PDF size: 201.88 Kb.


ABSTRACT

Background: The study of the current jaw functional orthopedic appliances can provide new knowledge for the improvement of the patients’ treatment with mandibular retrognathia.
Objective: To study deeply the current jaw functional orthopedic appliances for the patients’ treatment with mandibular retrognathia.
Development: A bibliographic review was conducted in the SciELO, PubMed, Ebsco, Cumed and Lilacs databases. A total of 37 articles were reviewed, more than 80 % from the last five years. Theoretical bases on the jaw functional orthopedics in the patients’ treatment with mandibular retrognathia and current appliances in use were identified.
Conclusions: New functional appliance options, mostly fixed and classified as passive dent supportive, are available for the patients’ treatment with mandibular retrognathia.


REFERENCES

  1. Herrera Navarrete IS, Torres Jiménez A. Ortopedia funcional de los maxilares en el tratamiento temprano de maloclusiones clase II por retrusión mandibular: reporte de caso clínico. Revista Mexicana Ortodoncia [Internet]. 2017 [citado 12 Ago 2020];5(3). Disponible en: Disponible en: https://www.elsevier.es/es-revista-revista-mexicana-ortodoncia-126-pdf-S2395921517300831

  2. Contreras Araiza JD, Baez Mondragón DT. Tratamiento ortopédico SN6 en adolescentes con maloclusión clase II: reporte de caso. Rev ADM [Internet]. 2017 [citado 6 Ene 2021];74(3):152-8. Disponible en: Disponible en: https://www.medigraphic.com/pdfs/adm/od-2017/od173h.pdf

  3. Luis Acosta AC, Pérez García LM, de la Rosa Cabrera Y, Reytor Saavedra E, León Casanova O. Utilización del Neville Bass en el tratamiento del retrognatismo mandibular. Reporte de caso. Gac Méd Espirit [Internet]. 2018 [citado 6 Ene 2021];20(3):128-35. Disponible en: Disponible en: http://scielo.sld.cu/pdf/gme/v20n3/1608-8921-gme-20-03-128.pdf

  4. Proffit WR, Fields HW, Larson BE, Sarver DM. Ortodoncia Contemporánea. 5ta ed. Barcelona: Elsevier; 2013.

  5. Alhammadi MS, Elfeky HY, Fayed MS, Ishaq RAR, Halboub E, Al-Mashraqi AA. Three-dimensional skeletal and pharyngeal airway changes following therapy with functional appliances in growing skeletal Class II malocclusion patients: A controlled clinical trial. J Orofac Orthop [Internet]. 2019 [cited 2021 Jan 6];80(5):254-65. Available from: Available from: https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007%2Fs00056-019-00185-7

  6. Zhang CX, Shen G, Ning YJ, Liu H, Zhao Y, Liu DX. Effects of Twin-block vs sagittal-guidance Twin-block appliance on alveolar bone around mandibular incisors in growing patients with Class II Division 1 malocclusion. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop [Internet]. 2020 [cited 2021 Jan 6];157(3):329-39. Available from: Available from: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0889540619308388?via%3Dihub

  7. Ajami S, Morovvat A, Khademi B, Jafarpour D, Babanouri N. Dentoskeletal effects of class II malocclusion treatment with the modified Twin Block appliance. J Clin Exp Dent [Internet]. 2019 [cited 2021 Jan 6];11(12):e1093-e1098. Available from: Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6894910/pdf/jced-11-e1093.pdf

  8. Afzal E, Fida M. Evaluation of the change in the tangue posture andin the hyoid bone position after twin block appliance therapy in skeletal class II subjects. Dent Med Probl [Internet]. 2019 [cited 2020 Dec 8];56(4):379-84. Available from: Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31895502/

  9. Garcia Benedi MM, Alonso Valdés A, Ameneiros Narciandi O, Batista González NM. Bloques gemelos contra fuerza labial superior. Elementos en el tratamiento de Clase II división 1. Revista Latinoamericana de Ortodoncia y Odontopediatría [Internet]. 2018 [citado 8 Dic 2020];(2). Disponible en: Disponible en: https://www.ortodoncia.ws/publicaciones/2018/art-2/

  10. Wang W, Mo SC, Wang L. Changes of airway before and after Twin-block treatment in patients with mandibular retrusion. Shanghai Kou Qiang Yi Xue [Internet]. 2018 [cited 2020 Dec 8];27(6):607-611. Available from: Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/30899941/

  11. Sabine Ruf, Hans Pancherz. El tratamiento con el aparato de Herbst para la clase II. Revista Española Ortodoncia [Internet]. 2011 [citado 22 Dic 2020];41(4):205-213. Disponible en: Disponible en: https://dia/net.unirioja-es/servlet/articulo?codigo=3830567

  12. Gallardo Galdón RE. Uso y manejo del aparato de Herbst en la corrección de la maloclusión de Clase II. 1. Claves de estabilidad y evaluación de resultados a largo plazo, a propósito de un caso. Ortodoncia española [Internet]. 2012 [citado 22 Dic 2020];52(1):23-35. Disponible en: Disponible en: https://www.elsevier.es/es-revista-ortodoncia-espanola-348-pdf-X0210163712541806

  13. Manni A, Mutinelli S, Passini M, Mazzotta L, Mauro C. Herbst appliance and hored to miniscrewws with 2 types of ligation: Effectiveness in skeletal class II treatment. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop [Internet]. 2016 [cited 2020 Dec 22];149(6):871-80. Available from: Available from: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0889540616000974?via%3Dihub

  14. Souki BQ, Vilefort PLC, Oliveira DD, Andrade I Jr, Ruellas AC, Yatabe MS, et al. Three-dimensional skeletal mandibular changes associated with Herbst appliance treatment. Orthod Craniofac Res [Internet]. 2017 [cited 2020 Dec 22];20(2):111-8. Available from: Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5503125/pdf/nihms872347.pdf

  15. Atresh A, Cevidanes LHS, Yatabe M, Muniz L, Nguyen T, Larson B, et al. Three-dimensional treatment outcomes in Class II patients with different vertical facial patterns treated with the Herbst appliance. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop [Internet]. 2018 [cited 2020 Ago 12];154(2):238-48. Available from: Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6151354/pdf/nihms-988506.pdf

  16. Mannia A, Miglioratib M, Calzolarib C, Silvestrini Biavatib A. Herbst appliance anchored to miniscrews in the upper and lower arches vs standard Herbst: A pilot study. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop [Internet]. 2019 [cited 2020 Ago 12]; 156(5):617-25. Available from: Available from: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0889540619305943

  17. Martina S, Di Stefano ML, Paduano FP, Aiello D, Valletta R, Paduano S. Evaluation of Profile Changes in Class II Individuals Treated by Means of Herbst Miniscope Appliance. Dent J (Basel) [Internet]. 2020 [cited 2020 Dec 18];8(1). Available from: Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7175301/pdf/dentistry-08-00027.pdf

  18. Oliveira PM, Cheib-Vilefort PL, Gontijo HP, Melgaço CA, Franchi L, McNamara JA, et al. Three-dimensional changes of the upper airway in patients with Class II malocclusion treated with the Herbst appliance: A cone-beam computed tomography study. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop [Internet]. 2020 [cited 2020 Dec 18];157(2):205-211. Available from: Available from: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0889540619307966?via%3Dihub

  19. Voudouris JC, Kuftinec MM. Improved clinical use of Twin-block and Herbst as a result of radiating viscoelastic tissue forces on the condyle and fossa in treatment and long-term retention: growth relativity. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop [Internet]. 2000 [cited 2020 Dec 18];117(3):247-266. Available from: Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/10715086/

  20. Taylor KL, Evangelista K, Muniz L, Ruellas ACO, Valladares-Neto J, McNamara JJr, et al. Three-dimensional comparison of the skeletal and dentoalveolar effects of the Herbst and Pendulum appliances followed by fixed appliances: A CBCT study. Orthod Craniofac Res [Internet]. 2020 [cited 2020 Dec 18];23(1):72-81. Available from: Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7310571/pdf/nihms-1598623.pdf

  21. Parra Quintero N, Botero Mariaca PM. Aparatos de avance mandibular: ¿mito o realidad? Rev Nac Odontol [Internet]. 2013 [citado 19 Ago 2020];9 (Ed. Esp.):57-73. Disponible en: Disponible en: https://revistas.ucc.edu.co/index.php/od/article/view/432/433

  22. Al Jewair T, Ghorbaniparvar M, Franchi L, Flores Mir C. Comparison of treatment outcomes with crowned and banded mandibular anterior repositioning appliance (MARA) in Class II pubertal subjects: A retrospective cohort study. Int Orthod [Internet]. 2020 [cited 2020 Dec 18];18(2):297-307. Available from: Available from: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S1761722720300103?via%3Dihub

  23. Bassarelli T, Franchi L, Defraia E, Melsen B. Dentoskeletal effects produced by a Jasper Jumper with an anterior bite plane. Angle Orthod [Internet]. 2016 [cited 2020 Ago 19];86(5):775-81. Available from: Available from: https://meridian.allenpress.com/Angle-orthodontist/article/86/5/775/59351/Dentoskeletal-effects-produced-by-a-Jasper-Jumper

  24. Fernando López D, Ruiz Botero J, López Valle C. Contextualización de la maloclusión Clase II. Un enfoque contemporáneo. Revista Científica Sociedad Ortodoncia [Internet]. 2016 [citado 6 Ene 2021];3(1):11-27. Disponible en: Disponible en: http://www.drdiegolopez.com/descargas/revision-lopez-ruiz-lopezpez-0155.pdf

  25. Verma N, Garg A, Sahu S, Singh Choudhary A, Baghel S. Fixed functional appliance-A Bird’s Eyeview. Iosr-Jdms [Internet]. 2019 [cited 2020 Apr 19]; 18(3):67-83. Available from: Available from: https://www.iosrjournals.org/iosr-jdms/papers/Vol18-issue3/Series-5/N1803056783.pdf

  26. Ardeshna A, Bogdan F, Jiang S. Class II correction in orthodontic patients utilizing the Mandibular Anterior Repositioning Appliance (MARA). Angle Orthod [Internet]. 2019 [cited 2020 Apr 19];89(3):404-410. Available from: Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8117687/pdf/i0003-3219-89-3-404.pdf

  27. Cerrillo LD, García LL, García NR. Corrección de maloclusión clase II mediante el uso del aparato de reposicionamiento anterior mandibular. Rev Tame [Internet]. 2019 [citado 19 Abr 2020];8(22):891-894. Disponible en: Disponible en: https://www.medigraphic.com/pdfs/tame/tam-2019/tam1922k.pdf

  28. Aras I, Pasaoglu A. Class II subdivision treatment with the Forsus Fatigue Resistant Device vs intermaxillary elastics. Angle Orthod [Internet]. 2017 [cited 2020 Apr 19];87(3):371-376. Available from: Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8381987/pdf/i0003-3219-87-3-371.pdf

  29. Giuntini V, Vangelisti A, Masucci C, Defraia E, McNamara JA Jr, Franchi L. Treatment effects produced by the Twin-block appliance vs the Forsus Fatigue Resistant Device in growing Class II patients. Angle Orthod [Internet]. 2015 [cited 2020 Ago 19];85(5):784-9. Available from: Available from: https://meridian.allenpress.com/Angle-orthodontist/article/85/5/784/59526/Treatment-effects-produced-by-the-Twin-block

  30. Turkkahraman H, Eliacik SK, Findik Y. Effects of miniplate anchored and conventional Forsus Fatigue Resistant Devices in the treatment of Class II malocclusion. Angle Orthod [Internet]. 2016 [cited 2020 Ago 19];86(6):1026-1032. Available from: Available from: https://meridian.allenpress.com/Angle-orthodontist/article/86/6/1026/52462/Effects-of-miniplate-anchored-and-conventional

  31. Elkordy SA, Abouelezz AM, Fayed MM, Attia KH, Ishaq RA, Mostafa YA. Three-dimensional effects of the mini-implant-anchored Forsus Fatigue Resistant Device: A randomized controlled trial. Angle Orthod [Internet]. 2016 [cited 2020 Ago 19];86(2):292-305. Available from: Available from: https://meridian.allenpress.com/Angle-orthodontist/article/86/2/292/181616/Three-dimensional-effects-of-the-mini-implant

  32. Elkordy SA, Fayed MM, Abouelezz AM, Attia KH. Comparison of patient acceptance of the Forsus Fatigue Resistant Device with and without mini-implant anchorage: a randomized controlled trial. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop [Internet]. 2015 [cited 2020 Sep 12];148(5):755-64. Available from: Available from: https://www.clinicalkey.es/service/content/pdf/watermarked/1-s2.0-S0889540615008793.pdf?locale=es_ES&searchIndex=

  33. Moresca AHK, Dias de Moraes N, Topolski F, Flores-Mir C, Moro A, Moresca RC, et al. Esthetic perception of facial profile changes in Class II patients treated with Herbst or Forsus appliances. Angle Orthod [Internet]. 2020 [cited 2020 Dec 18];90(4):571-7. Available from: Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8028457/pdf/i0003-3219-90-4-571.pdf

  34. 34 . Jayachandran S, Wiltshire WA, Hayasaki SM, Pinheiro FH. Comparison of AdvanSync and intermaxillary elastics in the correction of Class II malocclusions: A retrospective clinical study. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop [Internet]. 2016 [cited 2020 Sep 12];150(6):979-88. Available from: Available from: https://www.clinicalkey.es/service/content/pdf/watermarked/1-s2.0-S0889540616304577.pdf?locale=es_ES&searchIndex =

  35. Dischinger BM. Skeletal class II case presentation: Utilization of the advansync 2 appliance. APOS Trends Orthod [Internet]. 2018 [cited 2020 Sep 12];8(3):168-74. Available from: Available from: https://apospublications.com/skeletal-class-ii-case-presentation-utilization-of-the-advansync-2-appliance/

  36. García Ramos RC. Nuevo aparato ortopédico fijo para el tratamiento de maloclusiones clase II división 1. Reporte de caso. Univ Odontol [Internet]. 2018 [citado 12 Sep 2020];37(78). Disponible en: Disponible en: https://revistas.javeriana.edu.co/index.php/revUnivOdontologica/article/view/23702

  37. Kim-Berman H, McNamara JA Jr, Lints JP, McMullen C, Franchi L. Treatment effects of the Carriere® Motion 3D™ appliance for the correction of Class II malocclusion in adolescents. Angle Orthod [Internet]. 2019 [cited 2020 Dec 18];89(6):839-46. Available from: Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8109165/pdf/i0003-3219-89-6-839.pdf




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com