medigraphic.com
ISSN 0016-3813 (Print)

2003, Number s1

<< Back Next >>

Gac Med Mex 2003; 139 (s1)

Unsafe Abortion in Latin America and the Caribbean: Definition of the Problem and Prevention

Espinoza H, López CL

Language: Spanish
References: 53
Page: 9-16
PDF size: 75.23 Kb.


ABSTRACT

Unsafe abortion is a threat to the health and life of women. This article reviews the many legal, social, and health service factors that together contribute to the problem of unsafe abortion in the Latin American and Caribbean region. Legal restrictions on abortion in the majority of Latin American countries result in a deficiency within the health system with respect to providing safe services to women for termination of pregnancy. In this context, women with unwanted pregnancies often opt for clandestine procedures that result in high rates of maternal morbidity and mortality. In addition, within the social sphere diverse factors related to violence have been identified in women who abort.
We present several proposals for primary prevention of unsafe abortion, such as reduction of unwanted pregnancies among adolescents as well as the organization of services for providing legal abortions. Additionally, we identify aspects of unsafe abortion that need to be explored further in the region.


REFERENCES

  1. World Health Organization. The prevention and management of unsafe abortion. Report of a Technical Working Group. Geneva, Switzerland: WHO;1992. (WHO/MSM/92.5).

  2. World Health Organization. Unsafe abortion. Global and regional estimates of incidence of and mortality due to unsafe abortion, with a listing of available country data. Geneva, Switzerland: WHO;1998. (WHO/RHT/MSM/97).

  3. The Alan Guttmacher Institute. Aborto clandestino: una realidad latinoamericana. New York; The Alan Guttmacher Institute; 1994.

  4. Riddle J. Contraception and abortion from the ancient world to the renaissance. Cambridge, MA, USA: Harvard University Press;1992.

  5. Amuchástegui A. Virginidad e iniciación sexual en México: experiencias y significados. México, D.F.: Edamex;2001.

  6. Bankole A, Singh S, Haas T. Reasons why women have induced abortions: evidence from 27 countries. International Fam Plann Perspec 1998;24:117-127&152.

  7. González D. Características psicosociales de mujeres adolescentes que interrumpen su embarazo. Trabajo presentado en la reunión El embarazo no deseado y el aborto inducido: desafíos de salud pública en América Latina y el Caribe. Cuernavaca, México, 12-14 noviembre, 2001.

  8. Colón A, Dávila L, Frenos M, Vicente E. Políticas, visiones y voces en torno al aborto en Puerto Rico. Centro de Investigaciones Sociales. San Juan, Puerto Rico: Universidad de Puerto Rico Recinto de Río Piedras;1999.

  9. Frigeiro M. Trabajo presentado en la reunión El embarazo no deseado y el aborto inducido: desafíos de salud pública en América Latina y el Caribe. Cuernavaca, México, 12-14 noviembre, 2001.

  10. National Abortion Federation. The truth about abortion. Washington, D.C., USA: NAF;1996.

  11. Grupo de Información sobre Reproducción Elegida. Aspectos del aborto en México. México, D.F.: GIRE;2000.

  12. Ipas. Carpeta del programa de capacitación “Mujeres, Violencia y Salud: Construyendo Alternativas para la Atención Integral.” México, D.F. Ipas;2002.

  13. Billings D, Moreno C, Ramos C, González D, Ramírez R, Martínez L, Rivera M. Constructing access to legal abortion services in Mexico City. Reproductive Health Matters 2002;10:86-94.

  14. Normas sobre despenalización del aborto, a favor de las mujeres: SCJN. Ciudad de México, febrero 2002. Sitio en Internet Cimacnoticias. Disponible en http://www.cimacnoticias.com/especiales/leyrobles/. Acceso el 03 de Octubre del 2002.

  15. Ramsammy L. Update on law reform: Guyana. Trabajo presentado en la reunión El embarazo no deseado y el aborto inducido: desafíos de salud pública en América Latina y el Caribe. Cuernavaca, México, 12-14 noviembre, 2001.

  16. Barreto T, Campbell O, Davies J, Fauveau V, Filippi V, Graham W, Mamdani M, Rooney C, Toubia N. Investigating induced abortion in developing countries: methods and problems. Stud Fam Plann 1992;23:159-170.

  17. Canto de Cetina T, Colven C, Hernández J, Vera L. Incomplete abortion: characteristics of the patients treated in the O’Horan Hospital of Mérida, Yucatán. Salud Publica Mex 1985;27:507-513.

  18. AbouZahr C, Ahman E. Unsafe abortion and ectopic pregnancy. In: Murray C, López A, editors. Health dimensions of sex and reproduction: the global burden of sexually transmitted diseases, HIV, maternal conditions, perinatal disorders, and congenital anomalies. Cambridge, MA, USA: The Harvard School of Public Health;1998.

  19. Organización Panamericana de la Salud. La salud en las Américas. Publicación científica 569. Washington, D.C., USA: OPS;1998.

  20. Consejo Nacional de Población. Ejecución del Programa de Acción de la Conferencia Internacional sobre la Población y el Desarrollo. México, D.F.: Consejo Nacional de Población;1999.

  21. Paxman J, Rizo A, Brown L, Benson J. The clandestine epidemic: the practice of unsafe abortion in Latin America. Stud Fam Plann 1993;24:205-226.

  22. Henshaw SK. Abortion incidence and services in the United States, 1995-1996. Fam Plann Perspect 1998;30:263-270, 287.

  23. Induced abortion (US), 2001. Sitio Internet The Alan Guttmacher Institute. Disponible en http://www.guttmacher.org/pubs/fb_induced_abortion.html. Acceso el 03 de octubre del 2002.

  24. Lara D. Measuring the prevalence of induced abortion in Mexico City: comparison of four methodologies. Trabajo presentado en la reunión El embarazo no deseado y el aborto inducido: desafíos de salud pública en América Latina y el Caribe.Cuernavaca, México, 12-14 noviembre, 2001.

  25. Adewole IF. Trends in postabortal mortality and morbidity in Ibadan, Nigeria. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 1992;38:115-118.

  26. Jain A, Solima E, Luciano A. Ectopic pregnancy. Am Assoc Gynecol Laparoscop 1997;4:513-530.

  27. Richards A, Lachman E, Pitsoe SB, Moodley J. The incidence of major abdominal surgery after septic abortion - an indicator of complications due to illegal abortion. South African Med J 1985;68:799-800.

  28. World Health Organization. Infections, pregnancies, and infertility: perspectives on prevention. Special Programme of Research, Development and Research Training in Human Reproduction. Task Force on the Diagnosis and Treatment of Infertility. Fertil Steril 1987;47:964-968.

  29. Olukoya A, Kaya A, Ferguson B, AbouZahr C. Unsafe abortion in adolescents. Int J Gynecol Obstetr 2001;75:137-147.

  30. McNaughton H, Catotti D, Blandon M, Rayas L. Forjando alianzas hacia una visión de derechos sexuales y reproductivos de Centroamérica. Dialogo 2002 May;6:2.

  31. Langer A. Embarazo no deseado: impacto sobre la salud y la sociedad en América Latina y el Caribe. Rev Panam Salud Publica 2002;11:192-204.

  32. Puffer R, Griffith G. Características de la mortalidad urbana. Scientific Publications No.151. Washington D.C., USA: PAHO;1967.

  33. Muñoz L, Ñáñez H, Becerra E, Klevens J. Mortalidad materna en el Instituto Materno-Infantil de Bogotá (1976-1980). Rev Fac Med 1985;39:331-351.

  34. LaGuardia K, Rothoz M, Belfort P. A 10-year review of maternal mortality in a municipal hospital in Rio de Janeiro: a cause for concern. Obstet Gynecol 1990;75:27-32.

  35. Bhatia J, Cleland J. Methodological issues in community-based studies of gynecological morbidity. Stud Fam Plann 2000;31:267-273.

  36. Costa SH. Commercial availability of misoprostol and induced abortion in Brazil. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 1998;63 (Suppl 1):131-9.

  37. Gómez P. PATH-Engender health study of misoprostol use in developing countries. Trabajo presentado en la reunión “El embarazo no deseado y el aborto inducido: desafíos de salud pública en América Latina y el Caribe.Cuernavaca, México, 12-14 noviembre, 2001.

  38. Huapaya V. La percepción de las mujeres acerca de la opciones disponibles para acceder al aborto. Trabajo presentado en la reunión El embarazo no deseado y el aborto inducido: desafíos de salud pública en América Latina y el Caribe. Cuernavaca, México, 12-14 noviembre, 2001.

  39. Gisbert M. Modalidades de aborto de las mujeres sub-urbanas andinas. Trabajo presentado en la reunión El embarazo no deseado y el aborto inducido: desafíos de salud pública en América Latina y el Caribe. Cuernavaca, México, 12-14 noviembre, 2001.

  40. Clark S, Blum J, Blanchard K, Galvao L, Fletcher H, Winikoff B. Misoprostol use in obstetrics and gynecology in Brazil, Jamaica, and the United States. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 2002;76:65-74.

  41. Ellsberg M, Heise L, Peña R, Agurto S, Winkvist A. Researching domestic violence against women: methodological and ethical considerations. Stud Fam Plann 2001;32:1-16.

  42. Goodwin MM, Gazmararian JA, Johnson CH, Gilbert BC, Saltzman LE. Pregnancy intendedness and physical abuse around the time of pregnancy: findings from the Pregnancy Risk Assessment Monitoring System, 1996-1997. Matern Child Health J 2000;4:85-92.

  43. Gazmararian J, Adams M, Saltzman L, Johnson C, Bruce F, Marks J, Zahniser S. The relationship between pregnancy intendedness and physical violence in mothers of newborns. Obstet Gynecol 1995;85:1031-1038.

  44. Muthal-Rathore A, Tripathi R, Arora R. Domestic violence against pregnant women interviewed at a hospital in New Delhi. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 2002;76:83-85.

  45. Kaye D. Domestic violence among women seeking post-abortion care. Int J Gynecol Obstet 2001;75:323-325.

  46. Leung T, Leung P, Chan P. A comparison of the prevalence of domestic violence between patients seeking termination of pregnancy and other general gynecology patients. Int J GynecolObstet 2002;77:47-54.

  47. d’Oliveira A, Diniz S, Schraiber L. Violence against women in health-care institutions: an emerging problem (Violence against women VI). Lancet 2002;359:1681-1685.

  48. García RH, González A, García C, Galicia J. Aceptación o rechazo del aborto por motivos maternos. Encuesta en 3021 empleados del gobierno federal. Ginecol Obstet Mex 2000;68:198-203.

  49. Meniru G, Hecht B, Hopkins M. Comprehensive preventive health care in female-factor infertility: issues, problems and proposals. Prim Care Update Ob/Gyns 2002;9:44-50.

  50. Singh K, Fong YF, Loh SY. Profile of women presenting for abortions in Singapore at the National University Hospital. Contraception 2002;66:41-46.

  51. US abortion rates continue to decline, especially among teens, oct, 2002. Sitio en Internet The Alan Guttmacher Institute. Available at http://www.guttmacher.org/pubs/archives/nr_340502.html. Acceso el 03 de Octubre del 2002.

  52. González D, Billings D. Attitudes towards abortion among medical trainees in Mexico City public hospitals. Gender Dev 2001;9:87-93.

  53. Coyaji K, Elul B, Krishna U, Otiv S, Ambardekar S, Bopardikar A, Raote V, Ellertson C, Winikoff B. Mifepristone-misoprostol abortion: a trial in rural and urban Maharashtra, India. Contraception 2002;66:33-40.




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com