Guerrón BEA, Ramos R, Alvarado A

Language: Spanish
References: 27
Page: 332-337
PDF size: 182.20 Kb.

ABSTRACT

Introduction: facial asymmetry, is a notorious condition in the lower third of the subject's facie and between the middle and upper thirds, in the latter this condition will be less evident; in such a way, it could be considered as one of the discomforts of greater incidence in patients with needs or not of orthodontic therapy. Objective: to evaluate by means of a literature review the orthodontic-surgical treatment of patients with facial asymmetry. Material and methods: the literature was selected through a search in the following electronic databases: PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science. The keywords used were: facial asymmetry, asymmetry, surgical treatment, surgical orthodontic treatment. The search was restricted to articles in English published from 2011 to 2021. Results: after applying the inclusion and exclusion criteria, a total of 27 articles were obtained and reviewed. The literature review of orthodontic-surgical treatment in patients with facial asymmetry was performed. Conclusion: surgical orthodontic approach is necessary for the correction of facial asymmetry, the protocol will depend on the clinical situation, the choice of surgical orthodontic treatment, which will give significant improvements in facial symmetry.

REFERENCES

1. Severt TR, Proffit WR. The prevalence of facial asymmetry in the dentofacial deformities population at the University of North Carolina. Int J Adult Orthodon Orthognath Surg. 1997; 12 (3): 171-176.

2. Sekiya T, Nakamura Y, Oikawa T, Ishii H, Hirashita A, Seto K. Elimination of transverse dental compensation is critical for treatment of patients with severe facial asymmetry. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2010; 137 (4): 552-562.

3. Bishara SE, Burkey PS, Kharouf JG. Dental and facial asymmetries: a review. Angle Orthod. 1994; 64 (2): 89-98.

4. Ko EW, Huang CS, Chen YR. Characteristics and corrective outcome of face asymmetry by orthognathic surgery. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2009; 67 (10): 2201-2209.

5. Kobus K, Kobus-Zalena K. The treatment of facial asymmetry: review. Vol. 26. Advances in Clinical and experimental medicine. Wroclaw University of Medicine; 2017. pp. 1301-1311.

6. Chia MS, Naini FB, Gill DS. The aetiology, diagnosis and management of mandibular asymmetry. Ortho Update. 2008; 1 (1): 44-52.

7. Haraguchi S, Iguchi Y, Takada K. Asymmetry of the face in orthodontic patients. Angle Orthod. 2008; 78 (3): 421-426.

8. Cheong YW, Lo LJ. Facial asymmetry: etiology, evaluation, and management. Chang Gung Med J. 2011; 34 (4): 341-351.

9. Sasaki J, Hasegawa S, Yamamoto S, Watanabe S, Miyachi H, Nagao T. Relationship between facial asymmetry and positional plagiocephaly analyzed by three-dimensional computed tomography. J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 2020; 48 (3): 193-198.

10. Peck S, Peck L, Kataja M. Skeletal asymmetry in esthetically pleasing faces. Angle Orthod. 1991; 61 (1): 43-48.

11. Lindauer SJ. Asymmetries: diagnosis and treatment. Semin Orthod. 1998; 4 (3): 133.

12. Minich CM, Araújo EA, Behrents RG, Buschang PH, Tanaka OM, Kim KB. Evaluation of skeletal and dental asymmetries in Angle Class II subdivision malocclusions with cone-beam computed tomography. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2013; 144 (1): 57-66.

13. Legan HL. Surgical correction of patients with asymmetries. Semin Orthod. 1998; 4 (3): 189-198.

14. Burstone CJ. Diagnosis and treatment planning of patients with asymmetries. Semin Orthod. 1998; 4 (3): 153-164.

15. Christou T, Kau CH, Waite PD, Kheir NA, Mouritsen D. Modified method of analysis for surgical correction of facial asymmetry. Ann Maxillofac Surg. 2013; 3 (2): 185-191.

16. Da Pozzo F, Gibelli D, Beltramini GA, Dolci C, Gianni AB, Sforza C. The effect of orthognathic surgery on soft-tissue facial asymmetry: a longitudinal three-dimensional analysis. J Craniofac Surg. 2020; 31 (6): 1578-1582.

17. Kwon SM, Hwang JJ, Jung YH, Cho BH, Lee KJ, Hwang CJ et al. Similarity index for intuitive assessment of three-dimensional facial asymmetry. Sci Rep. 2019; 9 (1): 10959.

18. Brito HHA, Mordente CM. Facial asymmetry: virtual planning to optimize treatment predictability and aesthetic results. Dental Press J Orthod. 2018; 23 (6): 80-89.

19. Cintra O, Grybauskas S, Vogel CJ, Latkauskiene D, Gama NA Jr. Digital platform for planning facial asymmetry orthodontic-surgical treatment preparation. Dental Press J Orthod. 2018; 23 (3): 80-93.

20. Shen CH, Hung TY, Wang M, Chang YC, Fang CY. Utilizing virtual surgical planning and orthognathic surgery to correct severe facial asymmetry without orthodontic treatment. J Dent Sci. 2022; 17 (1): 647-651.

21. Choi JW, Park H, Kwon SM, Lee JY. Surgery-first orthognathic approach for the correction of facial asymmetry. J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 2021; 49 (6): 435-442.

22. Watanabe Y, Sasaki R, Matsuno I, Akizuki T. Surgery-first orthognathic surgery for severe facial asymmetry combined with mandibular distraction osteogenesis using a three-dimensional internal distractor. J Craniofac Surg. 2019; 30 (1): 39-46.

23. Wang YC, Wallace CG, Pai BC, Chen HL, Lee YT, Hsiao YC et al. Orthognathic surgery with simultaneous autologous fat transfer for correction of facial asymmetry. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2017; 139 (3): 693-700.

24. Kwon SM, Baik HS, Jung HD, Jang W, Choi YJ. Diagnosis and surgical outcomes of facial asymmetry according to the occlusal cant and menton deviation. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2019; 77 (6): 1261-1275.

25. Kim KA, Lee JW, Park JH, Kim BH, Ahn HW, Kim SJ. Targeted presurgical decompensation in patients with yaw-dependent facial asymmetry. Korean J Orthod. 2017; 47 (3): 195-206.

26. Sharma P, Kumar S, Kapoor P, Verma A. Orthosurgical management of a case of facial asymmetry secondary to temporomandibular joint ankylosis. Ann Maxillofac Surg. 2019; 9 (1): 177-182.

27. Usumi-Fujita R, Nakakuki K, Fujita K, Kosugi M, Yonemitus I, Fukuyama E et al. Collaborative treatment for a case of condylar hyperplastic facial asymmetry. Angle Orthod. 2018; 88 (4): 503-517.