medigraphic.com
ISSN 2007-8013 (Print)
Órgano oficial de la Universidad Autónoma de Sinaloa

2019, Number 4

<< Back Next >>

Rev Med UAS 2019; 9 (4)

Comparison of Totaltrack vs conventional intubation in the comfort of awakening in laparoscopic cholecystectomy

Valencia EA, Martínez FJI, Peraza GFJ, Arce BB, Villars ZEG, Martínez RMF

Language: Spanish
References: 20
Page: 178-186
PDF size: 100.06 Kb.


ABSTRACT

Objective: To determine that the use of Totaltrack in patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy has better comfort in awakening than in those who use conventional orotracheal intubation. Methodology: An open controlled clinical trial was conducted, with patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy during the period March 2017 and March 2018, at the Hospital Civil de Culiac án. Two groups of 90 patients each were randomized. The final sample consisted of 173 patients; Group with Totaltrack intubation (n=87) and in Group with conventional intubation (n=86). Results: Comfort upon awakening is defined as the absence of cough, odynophagia or PONV. At 30 minutes, 72.4% patients in the intubation group with Totaltrack and 36% in the group with conventional orotracheal intubation (p = .000) what is included. At 60 minutes 79.3% and 45.9% patients in the intubation group with Totaltrak and con ventional intubation, respectively (p = .000). Conclusions: The use of Totaltrack for endotracheal intubation offers better comfort when awake than conventional intubation in patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy.


REFERENCES

  1. Tsui C, Klein R, Garabrant M. Minimally invasivesurgery: national trends in adoption and futuredirections for hospital strategy. Surg Endosc. 2013; 27 (7):2253-2257.

  2. Lyu Y, Cheng Y, Wang B, Zhao S, Chen L. Earlyversus delayed laparoscopic cholecystectomyfor acute cholecystitis: an up-to-date metaanalysisof randomized controlled trials. SurgEndosc. 2018; 32(12):4728-4741.

  3. Wu XD, Tian X, Liu MM, Wu L, Zhao S, Zhao L.Meta-analysis comparing early versus delayedlaparoscopic cholecystectomy for acutecholecystitis. Br J Surg. 2015; 102(11):1302-13.

  4. Álvarez A. et al. Colelitiasis en el embarazo yposparto. Prevalencia, presentación y consecuenciasen un hospital de referencia en BajaCalifornia Sur. Gac Med Mex. 2017; 153(2):159-65.

  5. Bajwa S, Kulshrestha A. Anaesthesia for laparoscopicsurgery: General vs regional anaesthesia.J Minim Access Surg. 2016; 12(1):4-9.

  6. Mira J, Aranaz J. La satisfacción del pacientecomo una medida del resultado de la atenciónsanitaria. Med Clin. 2000;114(Supl 3):26-33.

  7. Gempeler F. Avellaneda J. Evaluación de la satisfaccióny tiempo en recuperación con diferentestécnicas anestésicas en el Hospital Universitariode San Ignacio. Rev Col Anestesiol. 2010;38(2): 178-202.

  8. Valero Bernal JF, Castillo Rosado VP, DuarteOrtiz G. Evaluación de la satisfacción en recuperación.Rev Col Anestesiol. 2010 Oct;38(3):409-.

  9. Mira JJ, Aranaz J. La satisfacción del paciente como una medida del resultado de la atención sanitaria. Med Clin. 2000; 114 (3): 26-33.

  10. Wu C, Naquibuddin M, Fleisher L. Measurement of patient satisfaction as an outcome of regional anesthesia. Ansth Pain Med. 2001; 26(3):196-208.

  11. Suppiah RK, Rajan S, Paul J, Kumar L. Respiratoryand hemodynamic outcomes following exchangeextubation with laryngeal mask airwayas compared to traditional awake extubation.Anesth Essays Res 2016; 10:212-7.

  12. Xu R, Lian Y, Li WX. Airway complications duringand after general anesthesia: A comparison,systematic review and Meta-Analysis of usingflexible laryngeal mask airways and endotrachealtubes. PLOS ONE. 2016; 11(7): 137.

  13. Jain S, Nazir N, Khan RM, Ahmed SM. A prospectiverandomized control study comparingclassic laryngeal mask airway with Guedel's airwayfor tracheal tube exchange and smooth extubation.Anesth Essays Res. 2016; 10(3):552-556.

  14. Jain S, Khan RM, Ahmed SM, Singh M. Comparisonof classic laryngeal mask airway with Ambularyngeal mask for tracheal tube exchange: Aprospective randomized controlled study. IndianJ Anaesth. 2013; 57:259–64.

  15. Cook TM, Major complications of airway managementin the UK: results of the fourth nationalaudit project of the royal college of anaesthetistsand the difficult airway society. Part 1: anaesthesia.Br J Anaesth. 2011; 106(5):617-31.

  16. Jaensson M, Gupta A, Nilsson U. Gender differencesin sore throat and hoarseness followingendotracheal tube or laryngeal mask airway: aprospective study. BMC Anesthesiol. 2014;14(1):56.

  17. Phormayon J, Farid SD, El-Solh AA, AdlparvarG, Nader ND. The impact of endotrachealtube vs. Laryngeal mask airway on the incidenceof postoperative nausea and vomiting: a systemicreview and meta-analysis. Middle East JAnaesthesiol. 2015; 23(1):9-16.

  18. Isazadehfar K, Entezariasl M, ShahbazzadeganB, Nourani Z, Shafaee Y. The comparative studyof ondansetron and metoclopramide effects inreducing nausea and vomiting after laparoscopiccholecystectomy. Acta Med Iran. 2017;55(4):254-258.

  19. Öbrink E, Jildenstål P, Oddby E, Jakobsson JG.Post-operative nausea and vomiting: update onpredicting the probability and ways to minimizeits occurrence, with focus on ambulatory surgery.Int J Surg. 2015; 15:100-6.

  20. Kushikata T, Hirota K. Mechanisms of AnestheticEmergence: Evidence for Active Reanimation.Curr Anesthesiol Rep. 2013; 4(1):49-56.




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com