medigraphic.com
ISSN 1561-3100 (Print)

2021, Number 2

<< Back Next >>

Revista Cubana de Ortopedia y Traumatología 2021; 35 (2)

Anterior approach to the hip: history and benefits

Tabares NH, Tabares SH

Language: Spanish
References: 56
Page: 1-22
PDF size: 510.31 Kb.


ABSTRACT

Hip replacement is one of the most successful surgical treatments in orthopedic surgery. There is currently greater interest in the anterior approach to hip arthroplasties determined by the belief that being intramuscular it can lead to less pain, faster recovery, better hip stability and comparatively less risk of dislocation after surgery. The purpose of this article is to review the history of the anterior approach to the hip joint, its intramuscular access route and its main benefits. Popularized by Smith-Petersen in 1917, the anterior approach to the hip owes its first written reference to Carl Hueter. All hip approaches have been shown to be safe and effective, with advantages and disadvantages. Long-term studies of larger numbers of patients are required to demonstrate cost benefit and higher quality of medical care.


REFERENCES

  1. Maletti P, García E, Mantilaro E, Maletti F. Abordaje anterior directo en el reemplazo total de cadera en camilla convencional con técnica mini-invasiva. Descripción de la técnica quirúrgica. Revista acaro. 2017;l3(2):55-60.

  2. Higgins BT, Barlow DR, Nathan E, Heagerty NE, Lin TJ. Anterior vs. Posterior approach for total hip arthroplasty, a systematic review and meta-analysis. The Journal of Arthroplasty. 2015;30:419-34.

  3. Petis S, Howard J, Lanting B, Jones I, Birmingham T, Vasarhelyi E. Comparing the anterior, posterior and lateral approach: gait analysis in total hip arthroplasty. Can J Surg. 2018;61(1):50-7.

  4. Petis S, Howard J, Lanting B. Surgical approach in primary total hip arthroplasty: anatomy, technique, and clinical outcomes. Can J Surg. 2015;58:128-39.

  5. Weber M, Ganz R. El abordaje anterior de cadera y pelvis: El abordaje de Smith-Petersen modificado y sus posibilidades de ampliación. Tec. Quir. Ortop. Traumatol. 2003;12(2):69-81.

  6. Rachbauer F, Kain MS, Leunig M. The History of the Anterior Approach to the Hip. Orthop Clin N Am. 2009;40:311-20.

  7. 7 . Calandruccio R. Voies d'abord de la hanche. Milano, Barcelona, Bonn. In: Roy-Camille R, Laurin CA, Riley LH, editors, Membre inferieur, Atlas de Chirugie orthopedique, vol. 3. Paris: Masson; 1991:65-70.

  8. 8 . Wikipedia. [acceso 31/05/2008]. Disponible en: Disponible en: http://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Carl_Hueter .

  9. Konig F. Nekrolog. Langenbecks Arch Surg. 1882;17(3-4):421-30.

  10. 10 . Hueter C. Fu¨nfte abtheilung: die verletzung und krankheiten des hu ¨ftgelenkes, neunundzwanzigstes capitel. In: Hueter C, editor. Grundriss der chirurgie. 2nd ed. Leipzig: F.C.W. Vogel; 1883: p. 29-200.

  11. 11 . Vulpius O, Stoffel A. Operationen am hu ¨ftgelenk, 2. Orthopa ¨dische resektionen und mobilisierung des hu ¨ftgelenkes, 2. Vorderer hautschnitt nach hueter. In: Vulpius O, Stoffel A, editors. Orthopa ¨dische Operationslehre. 3rd ed. 1924. Stuttgart: Ferdinand Enke; p. 435-6.

  12. 12 . W.A.L. In memoriam Dr. MN Smith-Petersen. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1953;35:482-4.

  13. Smith-Petersen MN. A new supra-articular subperiosteal approach to the hip joint. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1917;2(15):592-5.

  14. Connolly KP, Kamath AF. Direct anterior total hip arthroplasty: Comparative outcomes and contemporary results. World J Orthop. 2016;7(2):94-101.

  15. Post ZD, Orozco F, Diaz-Ledezma C, Hozack WJ, Ong A. Direct Anterior Approach for Total Hip Arthroplasty: Indications, Technique, and Results. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2014; 22:595-603.

  16. Mohan R, Yi PH, Hansen EN. Evaluating online information regarding the direct anterior approach for total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2015;30:803-7.

  17. Higgins BT, Barlow DR, Heagerty NE, Lin TJ. Anterior vs. posterior approach for total hip arthroplasty, a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Arthroplasty. 2015;30:419-34.

  18. Alecci V, Valente M, Crucil M, Minerva M, Pellegrino CM, Sabbadini DD. Comparison of primary total hip replacements performed with a direct anterior approach versus the standard lateral approach: perioperative findings. J Orthop Traumatol. 2011;12:123-9.

  19. Berend KR, Lombardi AV, Seng BE, Adams JB. Enhanced early outcomes with the anterior supine intermuscular approach in primary total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2009;91(Suppl 6):107-20.

  20. 20 . D'Arrigo C, Speranza A, Monaco E, Carcangiu A, Ferretti A. Learning curve in tissue sparing total hip replacement: comparison between different approaches. J Orthop Traumatol. 2009;10:47-54

  21. Goebel S, Steinert AF, Schillinger J, Eulert J, Broscheit J, Rudert M, Nöth U. Reduced postoperative pain in total hip arthroplasty after minimal-invasive anterior approach. Int Orthop. 2012;36:491-8.

  22. Martin CT, Pugely AJ, Gao Y, Clark CR. A comparison of hospital length of stay and short-term morbidity between the anterior and the posterior approaches to total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2013;28:849-54.

  23. Poehling-Monaghan KL, Kamath AF, Taunton MJ, Pagnano MW. Direct anterior versus miniposterior THA with the same advanced perioperative protocols: surprising early clinical results. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2015;473:623-31.

  24. Spaans AJ, van den Hout JA, Bolder SB. High complication rate in the early experience of minimally invasive total hip arthroplasty by the direct anterior approach. Acta Orthop. 2012;83:342-6.

  25. Taunton MJ, Mason JB, Odum SM, Springer BD. Direct anterior total hip arthroplasty yields more rapid voluntary cessation of all walking aids: a prospective, randomized clinical trial. J Arthroplasty. 2014;29:169-72.

  26. Zawadsky MW, Paulus MC, Murray PJ, Johansen MA. Early outcome comparison between the direct anterior approach and the mini-incision posterior approach for primary total hip arthroplasty: 150 consecutive cases. J Arthroplasty. 2014;29:1256-60.

  27. Barrett WP, Turner SE, Leopold JP. Prospective randomized study of direct anterior vs postero-lateral approach for total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2013;28:1634-8.

  28. Lamontagne M, Varin D, Beaulé PE. Does the anterior approach for total hip arthroplasty better restore stair climbing gait mechanics? J Orthop Res. 2011;29:1412-7.

  29. Mayr E, Nogler M, Benedetti MG, Kessler O, Reinthaler A, Krismer M, Leardini A. A prospective randomized assessment of earlier functional recovery in THA patients treated by minimally invasive direct anterior approach: a gait analysis study. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon). 2009;24:812-8.

  30. Rathod PA, Orishimo KF, Kremenic IJ, Deshmukh AJ, Rodriguez JA. Similar improvement in gait parameters following direct anterior & posterior approach total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2014;29:1261-4.

  31. Reininga IH, Stevens M, Wagenmakers R, Boerboom AL, Groothoff JW, Bulstra SK, Zijlstra W. Comparison of gait in patients following a computer-navigated minimally invasive anterior approach and a conventional posterolateral approach for total hip arthroplasty: a randomized controlled trial. J Orthop Res. 2013;31:288-94.

  32. Rodriguez JA, Deshmukh AJ, Rathod PA, Greiz ML, Deshmane PP, Hepinstall MS, Ranawat AS. Does the direct anterior approach in THA offer faster rehabilitation and comparable safety to the posterior approach? Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2014;472:455-63.

  33. Varin D, Lamontagne M, Beaulé PE. Does the anterior approach for THA provide closer-to-normal lower-limb motion? J Arthroplasty. 2013;28:1401-7.

  34. Klausmeier V, Lugade V, Jewett BA, Collis DK, Chou LS. Is there faster recovery with an anterior or anterolateral THA? A pilot study. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2010;468:533-41.

  35. Amlie E, Havelin LI, Furnes O, Baste V, Nordsletten L, Hovik O, Dimmen S. Worse patient-reported outcome after lateral approach than after anterior and posterolateral approach in primary hip arthroplasty. A cross-sectional questionnaire study of 1,476 patients 1-3 years after surgery. Acta Orthop. 2014;85:463-9.

  36. Bender B, Nogler M, Hozack WJ. Direct anterior approach for total hip arthroplasty. Orthop Clin North Am. 2009;40:321-8.

  37. Reichert JC, Volkmann MR, Koppmair M, Rackwitz L, Lüdemann M, Rudert M, Nöth U. Comparative retrospective study of the direct anterior and transgluteal approaches for primary total hip arthroplasty. Int Orthop. 2015;39:2309-13.

  38. Restrepo C, Parvizi J, Pour AE, Hozack WJ. Prospective randomized study of two surgical approaches for total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2010;25:671-9.

  39. Bergin PF, Doppelt JD, Kephart CJ, Benke MT, Graeter JH, Holmes AS, Haleem-Smith H, Tuan RS, Unger AS. Comparison of minimally invasive direct anterior versus posterior total hip arthroplasty based on inflammation and muscle damage markers. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2011;93:1392-8.

  40. Bremer AK, Kalberer F, Pfirrmann CW, Dora C. Soft-tissue changes in hip abductor muscles and tendons after total hip replacement: comparison between the direct anterior and the transgluteal approaches. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2011;93:886-9.

  41. Meneghini RM, Pagnano MW, Trousdale RT, Hozack WJ. Muscle damage during MIS total hip arthroplasty: Smith-Petersen versus posterior approach. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2006;453:293-8.

  42. Frye BM, Berend KR, Lombardi AV, Morris MJ, Adams JB. Do sex and BMI predict or does stem design prevent muscle damage in anterior supine minimally invasive THA? Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2015;473:632-8.

  43. Tippets DM, Zaryanov AV, Burke WV, Patel PD, Suarez JC, Ely EE, Figueroa NM. Incidence of heterotopic ossification in direct anterior total hip arthroplasty: a retrospective radiographic review. J Arthroplasty. 2014;29:1835-8.

  44. Moskal JT, Capps SG, Scanelli JA. Anterior muscle sparing approach for total hip arthroplasty. World J Orthop. 2013;4:12-8.

  45. 45 . Alexandrov T, Ahlmann ER, Menendez LR. Early clinical and radiographic results of minimally invasive anterior approach hip arthroplasty. Adv Orthop. 2014(393):1-7. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/954208

  46. Seng BE, Berend KR, Ajluni AF, Lombardi AV. Anterior-supine minimally invasive total hip arthroplasty: defining the learning curve. Orthop Clin North Am. 2009;40:343-50.

  47. Jewett BA, Collis DK. High complication rate with anterior total hip arthroplasties on a fracture table. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2011;469:503-7.

  48. Yi C, Agudelo JF, Dayton MR, Morgan SJ. Early complications of anterior supine intermuscular total hip arthroplasty. Orthopedics. 2013;36:e276-e281.

  49. De Geest T, Vansintjan P, De Loore G. Direct anterior total hip arthroplasty: complications and early outcome in a series of 300 cases. Acta Orthop Belg. 2013;79:166-73.

  50. Barton C, Kim PR. Complications of the direct anterior approach for total hip arthroplasty. Orthop Clin North Am. 2009;40:371-5.

  51. Siguier T, Siguier M, Brumpt B. Mini-incision anterior approach does not increase dislocation rate: a study of 1037 total hip replacements. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2004;(426):164-73.

  52. Sheth D, Cafri G, Inacio MC, Paxton EW, Namba RS. Anterior and Anterolateral Approaches for THA Are Associated With Lower Dislocation Risk Without Higher Revision Risk. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2015;473:3401-8.

  53. Sariali E, Leonard P, Mamoudy P. Dislocation after total hip arthroplasty using Hueter anterior approach. J Arthroplasty. 2008;23:266-72.

  54. Christensen CP, Karthikeyan T, Jacobs CA. Greater prevalence of wound complications requiring reoperation with direct anterior approach total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2014;29:1839-41.

  55. Alvarez-Pinzon AM, Mutnal A, Suarez JC, Jack M, Friedman D, Barsoum WK, Patel PD. Evaluation of wound healing after direct anterior total hip arthroplasty with use of a novel retraction device. Am J Orthop (Belle Mead NJ). 2015;44:e17-e24.

  56. Horne PH, Olson SA. Direct anterior approach for total hip arthroplasty using the fracture table. Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med. 2011;4:139-45.




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com