medigraphic.com
ISSN 1561-3011 (Electronic)

2021, Number 2

<< Back Next >>

Rev Cubana Invest Bioméd 2021; 40 (2)

Composite biomaterials for bone restoration obtained by technologies based on the use of the electromagnetic field

Hernández-Escalona M, Veranes-Pantoja Y, Morejón-Alonso L, Llópiz-Yurell JC, Díaz-Águila C

Language: Spanish
References: 77
Page: 1-23
PDF size: 339.82 Kb.


ABSTRACT

Introduction: The global demographic panorama is changing. The population aged over 60 years is the fastest growing segment, as well as the one where bone tissue diseases are most common, increasing the demand of appropriate materials and technologies to restore those tissues.
Objective: To analyze the information so far generated about the development of composite biomaterials for bone repair, with an emphasis on the identification of emerging technologies based on the use of the electromagnetic field, its applications and potential.
Methods: An analysis was performed of scientific papers published in books, journals, patents and theses. Of the documentation selected, 80% was from the period 2010-2019.
Data analysis and integration: The methods identified were classified into five groups: chemical electrodeposition, be it by in situ electrophoretic synthesis, electrolysis or electrophoresis; electroporation; electrospinning; distal magnetic control and electromagnetic biostimulation of cells and tissues, either directly or incorporating devices which convert electromagnetic energy into mechanical energy.
Conclusions: These methods permit the conformation of composite cellular and acellular matrices as well as biostimulator devices controlling construction and action parameters in such a way that the processes obtained display greater reproducibility and are more in keeping with the specific requirements of each patient.


REFERENCES

  1. Beard JR, Bloom DE. Towards a comprehensive public health response to population ageing. The Lancet. 2015;385(9968):658-61. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(14)61461-6

  2. OMS. Informe mundial sobre el envejecimiento y la salud. Ginebra: Ediciones de la Organización Mundial de la Salud (OMS), 2015. [acceso: 15/07/2021]. Disponible en: https://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/handle/10665/186466/9789240694873_spa.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y

  3. Estadísticas CONd. Anuario Estadistico de Cuba 2019. La Habana, Cuba: Oficina Nacional de Estadísticas (ONE); 2020. [acceso: 16/07/2021]. Disponible en: http://www.onei.gob.cu/sites/default/files/aec.pdf

  4. Boretos JW, Eden M. Contemporary biomaterials: material and host response, clinical applications, new technology and legal aspects. New Jersey, USA: Noyes Publications; 1984.

  5. Preetha B, Sreekala M, Thomas S. Fundamental Biomaterials: Metals. Cambridge, England: Woodhead Publishing; 2018.

  6. Zhang LC, Chen LY. A review on biomedical titanium alloys: recent progress and prospect. Advanced Engineering Materials 2019;21(4):1801215. DOI: 10.1002/adem.201801215

  7. Guo Y, Xie K, Jiang W, Wang L, Li G, Zhao S, et al. In Vitro and in Vivo Study of 3D-Printed Porous Tantalum Scaffolds for Repairing Bone Defects. ACS Biomaterials Science & Engineering. 2019;5(2):1123-33. DOI: 10.1021/acsbiomaterials.8b01094

  8. Joshi G, Naveen B. Comparative study of stainless steel and titanium limited contact-dynamic compression plate application in the fractures of radius and ulna. Medical Journal of Dr. D.Y. Patil Vidyapeeth. 2019;12(3):256-61. DOI: 10.4103/mjdrdypu.mjdrdypu_140_18

  9. Aherwar A, Singh AK, Patnaik A. Cobalt based alloy: A better choice biomaterial for hip implants. Trends in Biomaterials and Artificial Organs. 2016;30:50-55. DOI: 10.13140/RG.2.1.2501.5284

  10. Heiden M. Magnesium, Iron and Zinc Alloys, the Trifecta of Bioresorbable Orthopaedic and Vascular Implantation - A Review. Journal of Biotechnology & Biomaterials. 2015;05. DOI: 10.4172/2155-952X.1000178

  11. Thomas S, Balakrishnan P, Sreekala MS. Fundamental Biomaterials: Ceramics. Cambridge, England: Woodhead Publishing; 2018.

  12. Ginebra M-P, Espanol M, Maazouz Y, Bergez V, Pastorino D. Bioceramics and bone healing. EFORT Open Reviews. 2018;3:173-83. DOI: 10.1302/2058-5241.3.170056

  13. Thomas S, Balakrishnan P, Sreekala MS. Fundamental Biomaterials: Polymers. Cambridge, England: Woodhead Publishing; 2018.

  14. Shi C, Yuan Z, Han F, Zhu C, Li B. Polymeric biomaterials for bone regeneration. Annals of Joint. 2016;1(9). DOI: 10.21037/aoj.2016.11.02

  15. Mulchandani N, Prasad A, Katiyar V. Resorbable Polymers in Bone Repair and Regeneration. In: Grumezescu V, Grumezescu AM, editors. Materials for Biomedical Engineering: Absorbable Polymers. Amsterdam, Netherlands: Elsevier; 2019. p. 87-125.

  16. Ambrosio L, Ed. Biomedical Composites. Cambridge, England: Woodhead Publishing; 2017.

  17. Qu H, Fu H, Han Z, Sun Y. Biomaterials for bone tissue engineering scaffolds: a review. RSC Advances. 2019;9(45):26252-62. DOI: 10.1039/C9RA05214C

  18. Bose S, Roy M, Bandyopadhyay A. Recent advances in bone tissue engineering scaffolds. Trends in Biotechnology. 2012;30(10):546-54. DOI: 10.1016/j.tibtech.2012.07.005

  19. Consoli D, D'Este P, Perruchas F. Biomaterials Stakeholders and Research in Europe. ESB Web site: The European Society for Biomaterials (ESB) 2017. [acceso: 18/07/2021]. Disponible en: https://www.esbiomaterials.eu/Cms/Content/12

  20. Zulueta-Cuesta JC. Gestión del conocimiento durante la transferencia tecnológica: universidad-empresa. Revista Avanzada Cientifica. 2010 [acceso: 17/07/2021]; 13(3):1-11. Disponible en: https://dialnet.unirioja.es/descarga/articulo/5074389.pdf

  21. Hernández-Escalona M, Veranes-Pantoja Y, Morejón-Alonso L, Llópiz-Yurell JC. Tendencias en el desarrollo de matrices compuestas para reparación ósea. Convención Internacional de Salud, Cuba Salud 2012. La Habana, Cuba: Ministerio de Salud Pública de Cuba; 2012. p. 2595-604. [acceso: 17/07/2021]. Disponible en: http://www.convencionsalud2012.sld.cu/index.php/convencionsalud/2012/paper/view/1857/658

  22. Feynman RP, Leighton RB, Sands M. The Feynman Lectures on Physics, Vol. II: The New Millennium Edition: Mainly Electromagnetism and Matter. New York: Basic Books; 2011.

  23. Landau LD, Lifshitz EM. Curso de Física Teórica, Vol.2: Teoría clásica de campos. Barcelona, España: Editorial Reverte; 1992.

  24. Barnes FS, Greenebaum B. Biological and medical aspects of electromagnetic fields. Boca Raton, FL, UEA: CRC press; 2018.

  25. Lin JC. Advances in electromagnetic fields in living systems. New York: Springer; 1994.

  26. Lin JC. Electromagnetic fields in biological systems. Boca Raton, FL, UEA: CRC press; 2011.

  27. Moore B, Asadi E, Lewis G. Deposition Methods for Microstructured and Nanostructured Coatings on Metallic Bone Implants: A Review. Advances in Materials Science and Engineering. 2017;2017:9. DOI: 10.1155/2017/5812907

  28. Gurrappa I, Binder L. Electrodeposition of nanostructured coatings and their characterization-A review. Science and Technology of Advanced Materials. 2008;9(4). DOI: 10.1088/1468-6996//9/4/043001

  29. Walsh FC, Perry B. Fundamental Definitions and Concepts. Transactions of the IMF. 1992;70(2):87-89. DOI: 10.1080/00202967.1992.11870949

  30. Besra L, Liu M. A review on fundamentals and applications of electrophoretic deposition (EPD). Progress in Materials Science. 2007;52(1):1-61. DOI: 10.1016/j.pmatsci.2006.07.001

  31. Blanda G, Brucato V, Pavia FC, Greco S, Piazza S, Sunseri C, et al. Galvanic deposition and characterization of brushite/hydroxyapatite coatings on 316L stainless steel. Materials Science and Engineering: C. 2016;64:93-101. DOI: 10.1016/j.msec.2016.03.088

  32. Horynová M, Remešová M, Klakurková L, Dvořák K, Ročňáková I, Yan S, et al. Design of tailored biodegradable implants: The effect of voltage on electrodeposited calcium phosphate coatings on pure magnesium. Journal of the American Ceramic Society. 2019;102(1):123-35. DOI: 10.1111/jace.15888

  33. Nie W, Gao Y, McCoul DJ, Gillispie GJ, Zhang Y, Liang L, et al. Rapid mineralization of hierarchical poly(l-lactic acid)/poly(epsilon-caprolactone) nanofibrous scaffolds by electrodeposition for bone regeneration. Int J Nanomedicine. 2019;14:3929-41. DOI: 10.2147/ijn.s205194

  34. Durairaj RB, Ramachandran S. In Vitro Characterization of Electrodeposited Hydroxyapatite Coatings on Titanium (Ti6AL4V) and Magnesium (AZ31) Alloys for Biomedical Application. International Journal of Electrochemical Science. 2018;13:4841-54. DOI: 10.20964/2018.05.85

  35. Zhitomirsky D, Roether JA, Boccaccini AR, Zhitomirsky I. Electrophoretic deposition of bioactive glass/polymer composite coatings with and without HA nanoparticle inclusions for biomedical applications. Journal of Materials Processing Technology. 2009;209(4):1853-60. DOI: 10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2008.04.034

  36. Cheong M, Zhitomirsky I. Electrodeposition of alginic acid and composite films. Colloids and Surfaces a-Physicochemical and Engineering Aspects. 2008;328(1-3):73-78. DOI: 10.1016/j.colsurfa.2008.06.019

  37. Maniglio D, Bonani W, Bortoluzzi G, Servoli E, Motta A, Migliaresi C. Electrodeposition of Silk Fibroin on Metal Substrates. Journal of Bioactive and Compatible Polymers. 2010;25(5):441-54. DOI: 10.1177/0883911510374384

  38. Mochales C, Frank S, Zehbe R, Traykova T, Fleckenstein C, Maerten A, et al. Tetragonal and cubic zirconia multilayered ceramic constructs created by EPD. J Phys Chem B. 2013;117(6):1694-701. DOI: 10.1021/jp3064432

  39. Hekmatfar M, Moshayedi S, Ghaffari SA, Rezaei HR, Golestani-Fard F. Fabrication of HAp-8YSZ composite layer on Ti/TiO2 nanoporous substrate by EPD/MAO method. Materials Letters. 2011;65(23-24):3421-23. DOI: 10.1016/j.matlet.2011.07.048

  40. Qi H, Heise S, Zhou J, Schuhladen K, Yang Y, Cui N, et al. Electrophoretic Deposition of Bioadaptive Drug Delivery Coatings on Magnesium Alloy for Bone Repair. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces. 2019;11(8):8625-34. DOI: 10.1021/acsami.9b01227

  41. Watanabe J, Akashi M. Novel biomineralization for hydrogels: electrophoresis approach accelerates hydroxyapatite formation in hydrogels. Biomacromolecules. 2006;7(11):3008-11. DOI: 10.1021/bm060488h

  42. Watanabe J, Akashi M. An Electrophoretic Approach Provides Tunable Mineralization Inside Agarose Gels. Crystal Growth & Design. 2008;8(2):478-82. DOI: 10.1021/cg0703487

  43. Kimura K, Kamitakahara M, Yokoi T, Ioku K. Formation Process of Hydroxyapatite Granules in Agarose Hydrogel by Electrophoresis. Crystal Growth & Design. 2018;18(4):1961-66. DOI: 10.1021/acs.cgd.7b01154

  44. Neves NM. Electrospinning for Advanced Biomedical Applications and Therapies. Shawbury, United Kingdom: Smithers Rapra Technology Ltd; 2012.

  45. Sun B, Long YZ, Zhang HD, Li MM, Duvail JL, Jiang XY, et al. Advances in three-dimensional nanofibrous macrostructures via electrospinning. Progress in Polymer Science. 2014;39(5):862-90. DOI: 10.1016/j.progpolymsci.2013.06.002

  46. Duque-Sánchez LM, Rodriguez L, López M. Electrospinning: la era de las nanofibras. Revista Iberoamericana de Polímeros. 2013 [acceso: 18/07/2021]; 14(1):10-27. Disponible en: https://reviberpol.files.wordpress.com/2019/07/2013-duque.pdf

  47. Arinstein A. Electrospun Polymer Nanofibers. Singapore: Pan Stanford Publishing Pte. Ltd.; 2018.

  48. Kny E, Ghosal K, Thomas S. Electrospinning: From Basic Research to Commercialization: Royal Society of Chemistry; 2018.

  49. Lyu S, Huang C, Yang H, Zhang X. Electrospun fibers as a scaffolding platform for bone tissue repair. J Orthop Res. 2013;31(9):1382-9. DOI: 10.1002/jor.22367

  50. Lao L, Wang Y, Zhu Y, Zhang Y, Gao C. Poly(lactide-co-glycolide)/hydroxyapatite nanofibrous scaffolds fabricated by electrospinning for bone tissue engineering. J Mater Sci Mater Med 2011;22(8):1873-84. DOI: 10.1007/s10856-011-4374-8

  51. Lamastra FR, Bianco A, Meriggi A, Montesperelli G, Nanni F, Gusmano G. Nanohybrid PVA/ZrO2 and PVA/Al2O3 electrospun mats. Chemical Engineering Journal. 2008;145(1):169-75. DOI: 10.1016/j.cej.2008.07.048

  52. Pattanashetti N, Hiremath C, Naik S, Heggannavar G, Kariduraganavar M. Development of Nanofibrous Scaffolds by Varying TiO2 Content in Crosslinked PVA for Bone Tissue Engineering. New Journal of Chemistry. 2020;44. DOI: 10.1039/C9NJ05118J

  53. Shao W, He J, Han Q, Sang F, Wang Q, Chen L, et al. A biomimetic multilayer nanofiber fabric fabricated by electrospinning and textile technology from polylactic acid and Tussah silk fibroin as a scaffold for bone tissue engineering. Materials Science and Engineering: C. 2016;67:599-610. DOI: 10.1016/j.msec.2016.05.081

  54. Shin SH, Purevdorj O, Castano O, Planell JA, Kim HW. A short review: Recent advances in electrospinning for bone tissue regeneration. J Tissue Eng. 2012;3(1):1-10. DOI: 10.1177/2041731412443530

  55. Kandušer M, Miklavčič D. Electroporation in Biological Cell and Tissue: An Overview. In: Vorobiev E, Lebovka N, editors. Electrotechnologies for Extraction from Food Plants and Biomaterials. New York: Springer; 2009. p. 1-37.

  56. Correa NM, Schelly ZA. Dynamics of Electroporation of Synthetic Liposomes Studied Using a Pore-Mediated Reaction, Ag+ + Br- ? AgBr. The Journal of Physical Chemistry B. 1998;102(46):9319-22. DOI: 10.1021/jp9823648

  57. Retelj L, Pucihar G, Miklavcic D. Electroporation of intracellular liposomes using nanosecond electric pulses--a theoretical study. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 2013;60(9):2624-35. DOI: 10.1109/tbme.2013.2262177

  58. Denzi A, della Valle E, Apollonio F, Breton M, Mir L, Liberti M. Exploring the Applicability of Nano-Poration for Remote Control in Smart Drug Delivery Systems. The Journal of Membrane Biology. 2016;250. DOI: 10.1007/s00232-016-9922-1

  59. Denzi A, della Valle E, Esposito G, Mir LM, Apollonio F, Liberti M. Technological and Theoretical Aspects for Testing Electroporation on Liposomes. BioMed research international 2017;2017. DOI: 10.1155/2017/5092704

  60. Meng Lin M, Kim HH, Kim H, Muhammed M, Kyung Kim D. Iron oxide-based nanomagnets in nanomedicine: fabrication and applications. Nano Rev 2010;1:4883. DOI: 10.3402/nano.v1i0.4883

  61. Cardoso VF, Francesko A, Ribeiro C, Banobre-Lopez M, Martins P, Lanceros-Mendez S. Advances in Magnetic Nanoparticles for Biomedical Applications. Adv Healthc Mater. 2018;7(5). DOI: 10.1002/adhm.201700845

  62. Mohammed L, Gomaa HG, Ragab D, Zhu J. Magnetic nanoparticles for environmental and biomedical applications: A review. Particuology. 2017;30:1-14. DOI: 10.1016/j.partic.2016.06.001

  63. Bock N, Riminucci A, Dionigi C, Russo A, Tampieri A, Landi E, et al. A novel route in bone tissue engineering: Magnetic biomimetic scaffolds. Acta Biomaterialia. 2010;6(3):786-96. DOI: 10.1016/j.actbio.2009.09.017

  64. Shimizu K, Ito A, Honda H. Mag-seeding of rat bone marrow stromal cells into porous hydroxyapatite scaffolds for bone tissue engineering. Journal of Bioscience and Bioengineering. 2007;104(3):171-77. DOI: 10.1263/jbb.104.171

  65. Shimizu K, Ito A, Yoshida T, Yamada Y, Ueda M, Honda H. Bone Tissue Engineering With Human Mesenchymal Stem Cell Sheets Constructed Using Magnetite Nanoparticles and Magnetic Force. Journal of Biomedical Materials Research Part B: Applied Biomaterials. 2007;82B(2):471-80. DOI: 10.1002/jbm.b.30752

  66. Oshima S, Ishikawa M, Mochizuki Y, Kobayashi T, Yasunaga Y, Ochi M. Enhancement of bone formation in an experimental bony defect using ferumoxide-labelled mesenchymal stromal cells and a magnetic targeting system. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2010;92(11):1606-13. DOI: 10.1302/0301-620x.92b11.23491

  67. Jasmin, Torres AL, Nunes HM, Passipieri JA, Jelicks LA, Gasparetto EL, et al. Optimized labeling of bone marrow mesenchymal cells with superparamagnetic iron oxide nanoparticles and in vivo visualization by magnetic resonance imaging. Journal of Nanobiotechnology. 2011;9:4. DOI: 10.1186/1477-3155-9-4

  68. Luciani N, Du V, Gazeau F, Richert A, Letourneur D, Le Visage C, et al. Successful chondrogenesis within scaffolds, using magnetic stem cell confinement and bioreactor maturation. Acta Biomaterialia. 2016;37:101-10. DOI: 10.1016/j.actbio.2016.04.009

  69. Madroñero de la Cal A. Utilización terapéutica de los campos magnéticos. I: Fundamentos del biomagnetismo. Patología del Aparato Locomotor. 2004 [acceso: 18/07/2021]; 2(1):22-37. Disponible en: https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/articulo?codigo=1010648&orden=27516&info=link

  70. Behrens SB, Deren ME, Monchik KO. A review of bone growth stimulation for fracture treatment. Current Orthopaedic Practice. 2013;24(1):84-91. DOI: 10.1097/BCO.0b013e3182793faa

  71. Brighton CT, Wang W, Seldes R, Zhang G, Pollack SR. Signal transduction in electrically stimulated bone cells. The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American Volume. 2001;83-A(10):1514-23. DOI: 10.2106/00004623-200110000-00009

  72. Miller SL, Coughlin DG, Waldorff EI, Ryaby JT, Lotz JC. Pulsed electromagnetic field (PEMF) treatment reduces expression of genes associated with disc degeneration in human intervertebral disc cells. The Spine Journal. 2016;16(6):770-76. DOI: 10.1016/j.spinee.2016.01.003

  73. Hart S, Bucio R, Dapino M. Magnetostrictive Actuation of a Bone Loading Composite for Accelerated Tissue Formation. Smart Materials Research. 2012;2012:1-7. DOI: 10.1155/2012/258638

  74. Malheiro VN, Spear RL, Brooks RA, Markaki AE. Osteoblast and monocyte responses to 444 ferritic stainless steel intended for a Magneto-Mechanically Actuated Fibrous Scaffold. Biomaterials. 2011;32(29):6883-92. DOI: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2011.06.002

  75. Sapir-Lekhovitser Y, Rotenberg MY, Jopp J, Friedman G, Polyak B, Cohen S. Magnetically actuated tissue engineered scaffold: insights into mechanism of physical stimulation. Nanoscale. 2016;8(6):3386-99. DOI: 10.1039/c5nr05500h

  76. Chiarelli P, De Rossi D. Polyelectrolyte Intelligent Gels: Design and Applications. In: Ciferri A, Perico A, editors. Ionic Interactions in Natural and Synthetic Macromolecules. Hoboken, N.J., USA: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.; 2012. p. 581-620.

  77. Otake M. Electroactive Polymer Gel Robots: Modelling and Control of Artificial Muscles. Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag Berlin; 2010.




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com