medigraphic.com
ISSN 2007-8560 (Print)
Órgano Oficial de Difusión Científica de la Federación Mexicana de Colegios de Ortopedia y Traumatología, A.C. (FEMECOT)

2022, Number 3

<< Back Next >>

Ortho-tips 2022; 18 (3)

Chronic acromioclavicular instability treated by anatomical reconstruction of the coracoclavicular ligaments: Mazzocca type plasty

Botello FT, Viveros EJR

Language: Spanish
References: 20
Page: 263-267
PDF size: 190.88 Kb.


ABSTRACT

A clinical case report is presented with a review of the literature on a chronic grade IIIB acromioclavicular dislocation, surgically managed with Mazzocca type plasty, its surgical technique and its functional results. Using the functional scales, Oxford Instability Score (OIS), UCLA (University of California at Los Angeles), with scores of 23 and 26 before surgery respectively, and a remarkable improvement with scores of 42 and 34 after surgery interpreted as excellent functionality of the evaluated limb.


REFERENCES

  1. Tang G, Zhang Y, Liu Y, Qin X, Hu J, Li X. Comparison of surgical and conservative treatment of Rockwood type-III acromioclavicular dislocation: A meta-analysis. Medicine (Baltimore). 2018; 97 (4): e9690.

  2. Kim SH, Koh KH. Treatment of Rockwood type III acromioclavicular joint dislocation. Clin Shoulder Elb. 2018; 21 (1): 48-55.

  3. Seijas R, Sallent A, Ares O. Rockwood type III acromioclavicular joint dislocation; are we still fighting? J Invest Surg. 2018; 31 (3): 234-235.

  4. Longo UG, Ciuffreda M, Rizzello G, Mannering N, Maffulli N, Denaro V. Surgical versus conservative management of Type III acromioclavicular dislocation: a systematic review. Br Med Bull. 2017; 122 (1): 31-49.

  5. Ozan F, Gok S, Okur KT, Altun I, Kahraman M, Gunay AE, et al. Midterm results of tension band wiring technique for acute Rockwood type III acromioclavicular joint dislocation. Cureus. 2020; 12 (12): e12203.

  6. Feichtinger X, Dahm F, Schallmayer D, Boesmueller S, Fialka C, Mittermayr R. Surgery improves the clinical and radiological outcome in Rockwood type IV dislocations, whereas Rockwood type III dislocations benefit from conservative treatment. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2021; 29 (7): 2143-2151.

  7. Franovic S, Pietroski A, Kuhlmann N, Bazzi T, Zhou Y, Muh S. Rockwood grade-III Acromioclavicular joint separation: a cost-effectiveness analysis of treatment options. JB JS Open Access. 2021; 6 (2): e20.00171.

  8. Lau ETC, Hong CC, Poh KS, Manohara R, Ng DZ, Lim JL, et al. A relook at the reliability of Rockwood classification for acromioclavicular joint injuries. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2021; 30 (9): 2191-2196.

  9. Fosser M, Camporese A. Operative treatment of acute acromioclavicular joint dislocations graded Rockwood III-V: a retrospective and comparative study between three different surgical techniques. Acta Biomed. 2021; 92 (5): e2021325.

  10. Kraus R, Zwingmann J, Jablonski M, Bakir MS. Dislocations of the acromioclavicular and sternoclavicular joint in children and adolescents: A retrospective clinical study and big data analysis of routine data. PLoS One. 2020; 15 (12): e0244209.

  11. León Portilla VT, Pico Segarra JL, Santillán Arias MG. Luxación acromioclavicular: tratamiento conservador. RECIMUNDO. 2019; 4 (1): 267-276.

  12. Tamaoki MJ, Lenza M, Matsunaga FT, Belloti JC, Matsumoto MH, Faloppa F. Surgical versus conservative interventions for treating acromioclavicular dislocation of the shoulder in adults. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2019; 10: CD007429.

  13. LeVasseur MR, Mancini MR, Berthold DP, Cusano A, McCann GP, Cote MP, et al. Acromioclavicular joint injuries: effective rehabilitation. Open Access J Sports Med. 2021; 12: 73-85.

  14. De Rooij PP, Van Lieshout EMM, Schurink IJ, Verhofstad MHJ; ACJ injury study group. Current practice in the management of acromioclavicular joint dislocations; a national survey in the Netherlands. Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2021; 47 (5): 1417-1427.

  15. Frantz T, Ramkumar PN, Frangiamore S, Jones G, Soloff L, Kvit A, et al. Epidemiology of acromioclavicular joint injuries in professional baseball: analysis from the major league baseball health and injury tracking system. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2021; 30 (1): 127-133.

  16. Berthold DP, Muench LN, Dyrna F, Uyeki CL, Cote MP, Imhoff AB, et al. Radiographic alterations in clavicular bone tunnel width following anatomic coracoclavicular ligament reconstruction (ACCR) for chronic acromioclavicular joint injuries. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2021; 29 (7): 2046-2054.

  17. Rosso C, Martetschlager F, Saccomanno MF, Voss A, Lacheta L, Beitzel K, et al. High degree of consensus achieved regarding diagnosis and treatment of acromioclavicular joint instability among ESA-ESSKA members. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2021; 29 (7): 2325-2332.

  18. Muench LN, Berthold DP, Uyeki C, Kia C, Cote MP, Imhoff AB, et al. Conversion to anatomic coracoclavicular ligament reconstruction (ACCR) shows similar clinical outcomes compared to successful non-operative treatment in chronic primary type III to V acromioclavicular joint injuries. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2021; 29 (7): 2264-2271.

  19. Natera Cisneros LG, Sarasquete Reiriz J. Manejo de la inestabilidad acromioclavicular crónica. Rev Esp Artrosc Cir Articul. 2015; 22 (1): 38-48.

  20. Liu Y, Zhang X, Yu Y, Ding W, Gao Y, Wang Y, et al. Suture augmentation of acromioclavicular and coracoclavicular ligament reconstruction for acute acromioclavicular dislocation. Medicine (Baltimore). 2021; 100 (33): e27007.




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com