Ferrer RH, Clavijo TR, Mesa IO, Báez HA, Matos RYA

Language: Spanish
References: 13
Page: 1-10
PDF size: 372.67 Kb.

ABSTRACT

Introduction: In recent years, the usage of laparoscopic surgery has offered new expectations regarding inguinal hernia treatment, since it not only allows the placement of a mesh without tension, but also allows it to be placed in the authentic weak area of the inguinal region, its posterior wall.
Objective: To show the outcomes obtained with the implementation of laparoscopic hernioplasty as an alternative treatment in inguinal hernias repair.
Method: A quasiexperimental study was carried out, during the period from June 2015 to May 2017, in the general surgery service of Comandante Pinares General Teaching Hospital, with a sample of 27 patients. Variables such as age, type of inguinal hernia, procedural complications, treatment recurrences, as well as the effectiveness of the procedure were controlled in comparison with conventional techniques.
Results: Unilateral inguinal hernia was the most frequently treated. Complications were caused by inguinodynia and mesh rejection. Variables such as blood loss and surgical time decreased. Effectiveness was considered good in most cases.
Conclusions: Laparoscopic hernioplasty is shown to have greater biological, social and economic advantages.

REFERENCES

1. Cruz JR, Abraham AJ, López RPR, León GO, Rodríguez BH, Pol HPG, et al. Reparación laparoscópica de las hernias inguinales. Rev. Cubana Cir. 2012;51(2):152-9.

2. Rutledge RM. Cooper Ligament (Mac Vay) repair. In: Inguinal hernia, advances and controversies. Edited by NE Arregui.Oxford, England: Radcliffe Medical Press; 2012.

3. Lichtenstein IL. Hernia Repair without Disability, Second edition. St Louis, Tokyo: Ishiyaku Euroamérica; 2013. p. 21-87.

4. Ger R, Monroe K, Duvivier R, Mishrick A. Management of indirect inguinal hernias by laparoscopic closure of the neck of the sac. Am J Surg. 2013;159:370-3.

5. De Win G, Van Bruwaene S, Kulkarni J, Van Calster B, Aggarwal R, Allen C, et al. An evidence-based laparoscopic simulation curriculum shortens the clinical learning curve and reduces surgical adverse events. Adv Med EducPract. 2016;7:357-70.

6. Saber A, Ellabban GM, Gad M, Elsayem K. Open preperitoneal versus anterior approach for recurrent inguinal hernia: A randomized study. BMC Surg; 2013. p. 12:22.

7. Zhang C, Li F, Zhang H, Zhong W, Shi D, Zhao Y, et al. Self-gripping versus sutured mesh for inguinal hernia repair: A systematic review and meta-analysis of current literature. J Surg Res. 2013;185:653-60.

8. Sánchez A, Vázquez A, Doria M, García C. La hernia inguinal en la era laparoscópica. Revista Médica Herediana. 2013;10(1):9.

9. Cañizares DI, Benvenuty ER, Ortiz AI. Hernioplastia preperitoneal endoscópica. Método para la reducción de costes. Cir Esp. 2013;72:261-3.

10. Sachs M, Encke A. Repair procedures in surgery of inguinal hernia in their historical evolution. Zentralbl Chir. 2013;118:780-7.

11. Fernández Gómez A, López Abreu Y, Rosales Aguilar Y, Pujol Legrá P. Resultados de aplicación de la técnica herniorrafia laparoscópica transabdominal preperitoneal en Granma. Revista Cubana de Cirugía. 2015 [acceso 20/03/2020];56(3). Disponible en: http://www.revcirugia.sld.cu/index.php/cir/article/view/318/133

12. Castorina S, Luca T, Privitera G, El-Bernawi H. An evidence based approach for laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair: lessons learned from over 1000 repairs. Clin Anat. 2013;25: 687-96.

13. Roselló FJR, Mustafá GLR, Álvarez BJ, León CLJ, Canals RPP, Juan García SC, et al. Técnica de Moran. Reparación protésica en la hernia inguinal con malla preperitoneal. Reporte preliminar. Rev. Cubana Cir. 2002;41(3):170-5.