Flores MAG, Ríos RJL

Language: Spanish
References: 11
Page: 312-316
PDF size: 134.91 Kb.

ABSTRACT

Introduction: Percutaneous nephrostomy placement is increasingly common, with multiple imaging techniques for placement. The Brödel area is the most used for its placement. There are multiple indications for performing a percutaneous nephrostomy that includes benign, malignant causes, or surgical complications. Objective: To publicize the main causes of percutaneous nephrostomies at Hospital Angeles Mocel. Material and methods: A descriptive, retrospective, and observational study were carried out in which we present the experience in percutaneous nephrostomies at Hospital Angeles Mocel for 10 years, from the period January 2010 to December 2020. Results: A predominance was observed in the male gender with 59.10% in the cases, as well as the most frequent age group was between the 5th and 6th decade of life. Retroperitoneal hematoma was the most frequent cause of benign obstructive uropathy in 42.86% and prostate Ca was the most frequent cause of malignant obstructive uropathy in 23.98%. The complications presented were 1.35%, being the renal hematoma the most frequent. Conclusions: The placement of percutaneous nephrostomy is essential to resolve acute or chronic conditions. Found few differences between the literature and the study.

REFERENCES

1. Cahill AM, Annam A, Baskin KM, Caplin D, Cramer HR Jr, Connolly B et al. Society of interventional radiology quality improvement standards for percutaneous nephrostomy in the pediatric population. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2021; 32 (1): 146-149.

2. Pabon-Ramos WM, Dariushnia SR, Walker TG, d'Othée BJ, Ganguli S, Midia M et al. Quality improvement guidelines for percutaneous nephrostomy. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2016; 27 (3): 410-414.

3. Ríos RJL, Vargas GCA. Nefrostomía percutánea. Acta Med. 2006; 4 (3): 207-209.

4. Cabrera M, Alonso-Burgos A. Intervencionismo urológico: nefrostomía percutánea y catéter/stent ureteral. Sociedad Española de Radiología Vascular e Intervencionista. 2012; 135 (1): 1-17.

5. Kandarpa K, Machan L, Durham J. Manual de procedimientos en radiología intervencionista. 5a ed. Barcelona, España: Wolters Kluwer; 2017.

6. Dagli M, Ramchandani P. Percutaneous nephrostomy: technical aspects and indications. Semin Intervent Radiol. 2011; 28 (4): 424-437.

7. Kocoglu H, Alan C, Malkoc E, Eskin, MB; Kurt, HA; Ersay, AR. Un abordaje diferente a la nefrostomía percutánea por urólogos. Actas Urolog Esp. 2012; 36 (10): 613-619.

8. Carcamo O, Venegas A, Mac Millan G, Jara D, Daviu A, Vallejo L. Nefrostomía percutánea ecoguiada con catéter Arrow: experiencia en el servicio de urología del Hospital Carlos Van Buren de Valparaíso entre los años 2008-2011. Rev Chil Urol. 2012; 77 (2): 129-130.

9. Galarza A, Palermo M, Duran G, Houghton E, Cena S, Sylvestre Begnis F et al. Nefrostomía percutánea por uropatía obstructiva. Med Argent. 2014; 100 (2): 120-126.

10. Maldonado-Alcaraz E, Ixquiac-Pineda G, López-Sámano V, Serrano-Brambila E. Absceso perirrenal: factores asociados a su desarrollo y mortalidad. Arch Esp Urol. 2008; 61 (1): 7-12.

11. Roa Saavedra X, Guzman Chaves F. Lesiones ureterales iatrogénicas. Revisión de una serie de casos en el Hospital Militar. Rev Urol Colomb. 2009; 18 (2): 75-80.