medigraphic.com
ISSN 0138-7103 (Print)

2021, Number 1

<< Back Next >>

Revista del Hospital Psiquiátrico de La Habana 2021; 18 (1)

Retroalimentación neuropsicológica de la corteza prefrontal en policonsumidores y abstemios, con incidencia en las metanfetaminas

da Silva RCY, Carvalho FPA, Gómez CJF, Ceja CZT, Martínez TOG, Hernández VMA

Language: Spanish
References: 23
Page:
PDF size: 383.03 Kb.


ABSTRACT

Introduction: Polydrug users with a preferential intake of methamphetamine or even abstainers who have been in similar conditions, may present significant functional alterations at the level of the prefrontal cortex.
Objective: Identify the neuropsychological alterations of these users and the changes that can be compare with participants in abstinence.
Methods: 30 young people participated in the sample, divided into 3 groups: active consumption, abstinence and no consumption; evaluated by the Battery of Executive Functions and Frontal Lobes (BANFE II), and monitored by ProCom Infiniti, a neurological and biological feedback team.
Results: There were significant statistically differences in the groups of active consumption and abstainers, for the general neuropsychological processes and of the dorsolateral region, as well as in the hemispheric feedback and blood pressure volume.
Conclusions: The poly-users who use methamphetamine as an impact drug can trigger important neuropsychological alterations, however, the withdrawal process can provide certain brain readjustments.


REFERENCES

  1. Adams JL, Collins RO. Prefrontal Cortex: Developmental Differences, Executive and Cognitive Functions and Role in Neurological Disorders, New York: Nova Science Publishers, Inc; 2013.

  2. Lu T, Kim P, Greig N, Luo Y. Dopaminergic Neuron-Specific Deletion of p53 Gene Attenuates Methamphetamine Neurotoxicity. Neurotoxicity Research. 2017:32(2):218-30. DOI: 10.1007/s12640-017-9723-z

  3. Alexander PD, Gicas KM, Willi TS, Kim, CN, Boyeva V, Procyshyn RM, Barr AM. A comparison of psychotic symptoms in subjects with methamphetamine versus cocaine dependence. Psychopharmacology. 2017;234(9-10):1535-47. DOI: 10.1007/s00213-017-4551-7

  4. Beckley JT, Randall PK, Smith RJ, Hughes BA, Kalivas PW, Woodward JJ. Phenotype-dependent inhibition of glutamatergic transmission on nucleus accumbens medium spiny neurons by the abused inhalant toluene. Addiction Biology. 2015; 21(3):530-46. DOI: 10.1111/adb.12235

  5. Lindsley CW, Hopkins CR. Return of D4 Dopamine Receptor Antagonists in Drug Discovery. Journal of Medicinal Chemistry. 2017;60(17):7233-43. DOI: 10.1021/acs.jmed-chem.7b00151

  6. Brenhouse HC, Lukkes JL, Andersen SL. Early Life Adversity Alters the Developmental Profiles of Addiction-Related Prefrontal Cortex Circuitry. Brain Sciences. 2013;3(1):143-58. DOI: 10.3390/brainsci3010143

  7. Goldstein RZ, Volkow ND. Dysfunction of the prefrontal cortex in addiction: neuroimaging findings and clinical implications. Nature Reviews Neuroscience. 2011;12(1):652-69. DOI: 10.1038/nrn3119

  8. Fuster JM. Executive Frontal Functions. Experimental Brain Research. 2000;133(1):66-70. DOI: 10.1007/s002210000401

  9. Fuster JM. The prefrontal cortex - an update: time is of the essence. Neuron. 2001;30(2):319-33. DOI: 10.1016/s0896-6273(01)00285-9

  10. Pandya DN, Yeterian EH. Comparison of prefrontal architecture and connections. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences. 1996;351(1346):1423-32. DOI: 10.1098/rstb.1996.0127

  11. Da Silva CYR, Carvalho PAF, Pombo PM, Gómez, JFC. Alteraciones neuropsicológicas asociadas al consumo de la Dextro-metil-anfetamina en adolescentes mexicanos. Revista Internacional de Investigación en Adicciones. 2019;5(1):15-22.

  12. Da Silva CYR, Olivares, JLP, Carvalho PAF, Pombo PM. Descripción anátomo-funcional de un suicidio por consumo adictivo de inhalables, estudio de caso post-mortem. Revista Internacional de Investigación en Adicciones. 2019;5(2):38-47.

  13. Stuss DT, Levine B. Adult clinical neuropsychology: lessons from studies of the frontal lobes. Annual Review of Psychology. 2002;53:401-33. DOI: 10.1146/annurev.psych.53.100901.135220

  14. Van Eden CG, Buijs R.M. Functional Neuroanatomy of the Prefrontal Cortex: Autonomic Interactions. Progress in Brain Research. 2000;126:49-62. DOI: 10.1016/S0079-6123(00)26006-8

  15. Fuster JM. The Prefrontal Cortex. Fourth Edition. Boston: Academic Press; 2008.

  16. Dawe S, Gullo MJ, Loxton NJ. Reward drive and rash impulsiveness as dimensions of impulsivity: implications for substance misuse. Addictive Behaviors. 2004;29(7):1389-405. DOI: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2004.06.004

  17. Forcada R, Pardo N, Bondía B. Impulsividad en dependientes de cocaína que abandonan el consumo. Adicciones. 2006;18(2):111-8. 18. Janetsian SS, Linsenbardt DN, Lapish CC. Memory impairment and alterations in prefrontal cortex gamma band activity following methamphetamine sensitization. Psychopharmacology. 2015;232:2083–2095. DOI: 10.1007/s00213-014-3840-7

  18. Bagheri M, Mokri A, Khosravi A, Kabir K. Effect of Abstinence on Depression, Anxiety, and Quality of Life in Chronic Methamphetamine Users in a Therapeutic Community. International journal of high-risk behaviors & addiction. 2015;4(3):1-5. DOI: 10.5812/ijhrba.23903

  19. Flores JC, Ostrosky F, Lozano A. BANFE II: Batería Neuropsicológica de Funciones Ejecutivas y Lóbulos Frontales. México, D. F.: Manual Moderno; 2011

  20. Lázaro JCL, Ostrosky SF. Neuropsicología de lóbulos frontales, funciones ejecutivas y conducta humana. Revista de Neuropsicología, Neuropsiquiatría y Neurociencias. 2008;8(1):47-58.

  21. Carrobles JA. Bio/neurofeedback. Clínica y Salud. 2016;27(3):125-131. DOI: 10.1016/j.clysa.2016.09.003

  22. Fajardo A, Guzmán AL. Neurofeedback, aplicaciones y eficacia. Revista Interdisciplinaria. 2016;33(1):81-93.

  23. Jackson AF, Bolger, DJ. The neurophysiological bases of EEG and EEG measurement: A review for the rest of us. Psychophysiology. 2014;51:1061-71. DOI: 10.1111/psyp.12283




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com