medigraphic.com
ISSN 1561-3100 (Print)

2021, Number 1

<< Back Next >>

Revista Cubana de Ortopedia y Traumatología 2021; 35 (1)

Evaluation of internal load in a high intensity functional training session: multiple case study

Bustos-Viviescas BJ, Delgado-Molina MC, Arley RN

Language: Spanish
References: 60
Page: 1-25
PDF size: 481.50 Kb.


ABSTRACT

Introduction: High intensity functional training is on the rise due to the multiple benefits it provides, although there are still few studies that allow the evaluation of the internal load in this modality.
Objective: To evaluate the internal load in a high intensity functional training session in trained subjects.
Method: Ten subjects participated (5 men and 5 women) trained in high intensity functional training, who developed a training session of the day consisting of three exercises. We registered the part time of each day work and the subjective perception of effort was recorded to calculate the internal training load. Statistical analysis was performed with PSPP statistical package (p-value of 0.05) applying Mann-Whitney U test and Wilcoxon test to identify differences between the internal loads obtained by genders and experience groups.
Results: The internal load handled for the session by women and men, was 253.20 and 242.46 arbitrary units, respectively. There were no differences in the internal load when comparing by genders and groups of experience in the day work partially and totally (p> 0.05).
Conclusions: A high intensity functional training session based on training blocks for the shortest possible time represented a “very hard” internal load for subjects trained in this modality.


REFERENCES

  1. Drew M, Finch C. The Relationship Between Training Load and Injury in Athletes: A Systematic Review. Sport Med. 2016;46(8):861-83. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40279-015-0459-8

  2. Eckard T, Padua D, Hearn D, Pexa B, Frank B. The Relationship Between Training Load and Injury in Athletes: A Systematic Review. Sport Med. 2018;48(8):1929-61. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40279-018-0951-z

  3. Halson S. Monitoring Training Load to Understand Fatigue in Athletes. Sport Med. 2014;44(2):s139-47. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40279-014-0253-z

  4. Jones CM, Griffiths PC, Mellalieu SD. Training Load and Fatigue Marker Associations with Injury and Illness: A Systematic Review of Longitudinal Studies. Sports Med. 2017;47(5):943-74. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40279-016-0619-5

  5. Gabbett T. The training-injury prevention paradox: Should athletes be training smarter and harder? Br J Sports Med. 2016;50(5):273-80. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bjsports-2015-095788

  6. Alsamir-Tibana R, Frade-de Sousa N, Prestes J, da Cunha-Nascimento D, Ernesto C, Falk-Neto JH, et al. Is perceived exertion a useful indicator of the metabolic and cardiovascular responses to a metabolic conditioning session of functional fitness? Sports. 2019;7(7):161-72. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/sports7070161

  7. Vasconcelos R. Carga interna de treinamento, desempenho e assimetria entre membros inferiores em praticantes de treinamento funcional de alta intensidade. [Dissertação apresentada ao Programa de Pós-Graduação em Educação Física para obtenção do grau de Mestre em Educação Física]. Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte. 2020[Citado 16 Abr 2020]. Disponible en: https://repositorio.ufrn.br/jspui/bitstream/123456789/28555/1/Cargainternatreinamento_Teixeira_2020.pdf

  8. Kliszczewicz B, Williamson C, Bechke E, McKenzie M, Hoffstetter W. Autonomic response to a short and long bout of high-intensity functional training. J Sports Sci. 2018;36(16):1872-9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/02640414.2018.1423857

  9. Crawford D, Drake N, Carper M, DeBlauw J, Heinrich K. Validity, reliability, and application of the session-RPE method for quantifying training loads during high intensity functional training. Sports. 2018;6(3):84. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/sports6030084

  10. Mate-Muñoz J, Lougedo J, Barba M, García-Fernández P, Garnacho-Castaño M, Dominguez R. Muscular fatigue in response to different modalities of CrossFit sessions. J Pone. 2017 [citado 6 Mayo 2020];12(7):1-17. Disponible en: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/28753624/

  11. Claudino J, Gabbett T, Bourgeois F, Souza H, Chagas R, Mezêncio B, et al. Crossfit overview. Systematic review and Meta-analysis. Sport Med Open. 2018 [citado 6 Mayo 2020];4(11):1-14. Disponible en: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/29484512/

  12. Alsamir-Tibana R, Frade-de Sousa N. Are extreme conditioning programmes effective and safe? A narrative review of high-intensity functional training methods research paradigms and findings. BMJ Open Sport Exerc Med. 2018;4(1):1-10. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjsem-2018-000435

  13. Alsamir-Tibana R, Frade-de Sousa N, Prestes J. Quantificação da carga da sessão de treino no Crossfit por meio da percepção subjetiva do esforço: um estudo de caso e revisão da literatura. Cienc Mov. 2017 [citado 16 Abr 2020];25(3):5-13. Disponible en: https://pesquisa.bvsalud.org/portal/resource/pt/biblio-880164

  14. Drum S, Bellovary B, Jensen R, Moore M, Donath L. Perceived demands and postexercise physical dysfunction in CrossFit(r) compared to an ACSM based training session. J Sports Med Phys Fitness. 2017;57(5):604-9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.23736/s0022-4707.16.06243-5

  15. American College of Sports Medicine. American College of Sports Medicine position stand. Progression models in resistance training for healthy adults. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2009;41(3):687-708. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1249/mss.0b013e3181915670

  16. American College of Sports Medicine. ACSM's guidelines for exercise testing and prescription. 10th ed. Michael Nobel, editor. New York: Wolters Kluwer; 2016.

  17. Glassman G. The New Girls. CrossFit J. 2004 [citado 3 Mar 2020];27:1-2. Disponible en: http://library.crossfit.com/free/pdf/27_04_new_girls.pdf

  18. Bustos-Viviescas B, Arévalo D, Acevedo A, Castellanos J. Cuantificación del entrenamiento funcional mediante la valoración del esfuerzo percibido en sujetos físicamente activos. Cuerpo Cult y Mov. 2019;9(2):87-102. DOI: https://doi.org/10.15332/2422474x/5362

  19. Foster C, Florhaug J, Franklin J, Gottschall L, Hrovatin L, Parker S, et al. A new approach to monitoring exercise training. J Strength Cond Res. 2001 [citado 3 Mar 2020];(15(1):109-15. Disponible en: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/11708692/

  20. Borg G. Psychophysical scaling with applications in physical work and the perception of exertion. Scand J Work Environ Heal. 1990;16(1):55-8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5271/sjweh.1815

  21. Arney B, Glover R, Fusco A, Cortis C, de Koning J, Erp T, et al. Comparison Of RPE Rating Scales For Session RPE. Med Sci Sport Exerc. 2019;51(Supplement):994-6. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1123/ijspp.2018-0637

  22. Fusco A, Knutson C, King C, Mikat R, Porcari J, Cortis C, et al. Session RPE during prolonged exercise training. Int J Sports Physiol Perform. 2019;1-3. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1123/ijspp.2019-0137

  23. Tibana R, de Sousa N, Cunha G, Prestes J, Fett C, Gabbett T, et al. Validity of Session Rating Perceived Exertion Method for Quantifying Internal Training Load during High-Intensity Functional Training. Sports. 2018;6(3):68. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/sports6030068

  24. Falk J, Tibana A, Frade-de Sousa N, Prestes J, Azevedo F, Kennedy M. Session Rating of Perceived Exertion Is a Superior Method to Monitor Internal Training Loads of Functional Fitness Training Sessions Performed at Different Intensities When Compared to Training Impulse. Front Physiol. 2020;11 (August). DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fphys.2020.00919

  25. Haddad M, Stylianides G, Djaoui L, Dellal A, Chamari K. Session-RPE method for training load monitoring: Validity, ecological usefulness, and influencing factors. Front Neurosci. 2017;11:612. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2017.00612

  26. Harriss D, Macsween A, Atkinson G. Standards for ethics in sport and exercise science research: 2018 update. Int J Sports Med. 2017;38(14):1126-31. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0043-124001

  27. Maté-Muñoz J, Lougedo J, Barba M, Cañuelo-Márquez AM, Guodemar-Pérez J, García-Fernández P, et al. Cardiometabolic and muscular fatigue responses to different crossfit(r) workouts. J Sport Sci Med. 2018 [citado 3 Abril 2020];17(4):668-79. Disponible en: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/30479537/

  28. Kliszczewicz B, John Q, Daniel B, Gretchen O, Michael E, Kyle T. Acute Exercise and Oxidative Stress: CrossFitTM vs. Treadmill Bout. J Hum Kinet. 2015;47(1):81-90. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/hukin-2015-0064

  29. Fernández-Fernández J, Sabido-Solana R, Moya D, Sarabia J, Moya M. Acute physiological responses during crossfit(r) workouts. Eur J Hum Mov. 2015 [citado 3 Mayo 2020];(35:114-24. Disponible en: https://www.eurjhm.com/index.php/eurjhm/article/view/362

  30. Timón R, Olcina G, Camacho-Cardeñosa M, Camacho-Cardenosa A, Martínez-Guardado I, Marcos-Serrano M. 48-hour recovery of biochemical parameters and physical performance after two modalities of CrossFit workouts. Biol Sport. 2019;36(3):283-9. DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.5114%2Fbiolsport.2019.85458

  31. Kliszczewicz B, Markert C, Bechke E, Williamson C, Clemons K, Snarr R, et al. Acute Effect of Popular High-Intensity Functional Training Exercise on Physiologic Markers of Growth. J Strength Cond Res. 2018. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1519/jsc.0000000000002933

  32. Mangine G, Van T, Feito Y, Holmes A, Serafini P, Box A, et al. Testosterone and Cortisol Responses to Five High-Intensity Functional Training Competition Workouts in Recreationally Active Adults. Sports. 2018;6(3):62. DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3390%2Fsports6030062

  33. Tibana R, de Almeida L, Frade de Sousa N, Nascimento D, de Sousa I, de Almeida J, et al. Two Consecutive Days of Extreme Conditioning Program Training Affects Pro and Anti-inflammatory Cytokines and Osteoprotegerin without Impairments in Muscle Power. Front Physiol. 2016;7(June):1-8. DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3389%2Ffphys.2016.00260

  34. Feito Y, Giardina M, Butcher S, Mangine G. Repeated anaerobic tests predict performance among a group of advanced crossfit-trained athletes. Appl Physiol Nutr Metab. 2019;44(7):727-35. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1139/apnm-2018-0509

  35. Jacob N, Novaes J, Behm D, Vieira J, Dias M, Vianna J. Characterization of hormonal, metabolic, and inflammatory responses in Crossfit(r) training. A systematic review. Front Physiol. 2020;11(August):1-15. DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3389%2Ffphys.2020.01001

  36. Córdova A. Immunomodulators for inflammation and muscle injury due to exercise. Apunt Med l'Esport. 2010 [citado 8 Ene 2020];(45(168):265-70. Disponible en: https://www.apunts.org/en-immunomodulators-for-inflammation-muscle-injury-articulo-S1886658110000629

  37. Michnik A, Sadowska-Krepa E, Domaszewski P, Duch K, Pokora II. Blood serum DSC analysis of well-trained men response to CrossFit training and green tea extract supplementation. J Therm Anal Calorim. 2017;130(3):1253-62. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10973-017-6346-9

  38. Coqueiro A, Rogero M, Tirapegui J. Glutamine as an anti-fatigue amino acid in sports nutrition. Nutrients. 2019;11(4):863-82. DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3390%2Fnu11040863

  39. Escobar K, Morales J, Vandusseldorp T. The Effect Of Carbohydrate Intake On Crossfit Performance And Associated Metabolic, physiological Demands And Responses. Int J Exerc Sci. 2016 [citado 13 Feb 2020];9(4):460-70. Disponible en: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/27766133/

  40. Escobar K, Morales J, Vandusseldorp T. Metabolic profile of a crossfit training bout. J Hum Sport Exerc. 2017;12(4):1248-55. DOI: https://doi.org/10.14198/jhse.2017.124.11

  41. Kliszczewicz B, Buresh R, Bechke E, Williamson C. Metabolic biomarkers following a short and long bout of high-intensity functional training in recreationally trained men. J Hum Sport Exerc. 2017;12(3):710-8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.14198/jhse.2017.123.15

  42. Durkalec-Michalski K, Zawieja EE, Podgórski T, Loniewski I, Zawieja BE, Warzybok M, et al. The effect of chronic progressive-dose sodium bicarbonate ingestion on CrossFit-like performance: A double-blind, randomized cross-over trial. PLoS One. 2018;13(5):1-18. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0197480

  43. Feito Y, Heinrich K, Butcher S, Poston W. High-Intensity Functional Training (HIFT): Definition and Research Implications for Improved Fitness. Sports. 2018;6(3):76. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/sports6030076

  44. Dexheimer J, Schroeder E, Sawyer B, Pettitt R, Aguinaldo A, Torrence W. Physiological Performance Measures as Indicators of CrossFit(r) Performance. Sports. 2019;7(4):93. DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3390%2Fsports7040093

  45. Bustos-Viviescas B, Merchán-Osorio R, Acevedo-Mindiola A. Relación entre la velocidad aeróbica máxima continua e intermitente con el rendimiento del WOD Crossfit(r) Karen en sujetos físicamente activos. Rev Cubana Invest Bioméd. 2021[citado 11 Feb 2020];40(1). Disponible en: http://www.revibiomedica.sld.cu/index.php/ibi/article/view/822

  46. Williamson C, Feito Y, Kliszczewicz B, Mangine G. The influence of pace on performance during a five-week online fitness competition. Med Sci Sport Exerc. 2017 [citado 29 Abr 2020];(49(5S):963. Disponible en: https://www.medsci.cn/sci/show_paper.asp?id=03d5911a8822469e

  47. Mendez-Villanueva A, Edge J, Suriano R, Hamer P, Bishop D. The recovery of repeated-sprint exercise is associated with PCR resynthesis, while muscle Ph and EMG amplitude remain depressed. PLoS One. 2012;7(12):4-13. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0051977

  48. Haddock C, Poston W, Heinrich K, Jahnke S, Jitnarin N. The benefits of high-intensity functional training fitness programs for military personnel. Mil Med. 2016;181(11):e1508-14. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7205/milmed-d-15-00503

  49. Murawska-Cialowicz E, Wojna J, Zuwala-Jagiello J. Crossfit training changes brain-derived neurotrophic factor and irisin levels at rest, after wingate and progressive tests, and improves aerobic capacity and body composition of young physically active men and women. J Physiol Pharmacol. 2015 [citado 7 Abr 2020];66(6):811-21. Disponible en: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/26769830/

  50. Garber C, Blissmer B, Deschenes M, Franklin B, Lamont M, Lee I, et al. American College and Sports Medicine. Position stand. Quantity and quality of exercise for developing and maintaining cardiorespiratory, musculoskeletal, and neuromotor fitness in apparently healthy adults. Guidance for prescribing exercise. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2011;43(7):1334-59. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1249/mss.0b013e318213fefb

  51. Lekhi C, Gupta P, Singh B. Influence of exercise on oxidant stress products in elite Indian cyclists. Br J Sports Med. 2007;41(10):691-3. DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1136%2Fbjsm.2007.037663

  52. Box A, Feito Y, Brown C, Heinrich K, Petruzzello S. High intensity functional training (HIFT) and competitions: How motives differ by length of participation. PLoS One. 2019;14(3):1-14. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0213812

  53. Williams S, Hitchcock J, Davies L, Barnes C, Williams S, Williams A. Injury surveillance during competitive functional fitness racing events. Int J Exerc Sci. 2020 [citado 19 Ene 2020];13(6):197-205. Disponible en: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32148641/

  54. Feito Y, Burrows E, Tabb L, Ciesielka K. Breaking the myths of competition: A cross-sectional analysis of injuries among CrossFit trained participants. BMJ Open Sport Exerc Med. 2020;6(1):1-9. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjsem-2020-000750

  55. Tibana A, Frade de Sousa N, Prestes J, Feito Y, Ferreira C, Voltarelli F. Monitoring Training Load, Well-Being, Heart Rate Variability, and Competitive Performance of a Functional-Fitness Female Athlete: A Case Study. Sports. 2019;7(2):35. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/sports7020035

  56. Vasconcelos R, Ricarte G, Luis A, Silva P, Tinoco B. Effects of six weeks of high-intensity functional training on physical performance in participants with different training volumes and frequencies. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020;17(17):6058. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17176058

  57. Pereira L, Barbosa de Lima J, Dias D, De Caldas H, Vítor R, Medeiros Da Costa D, et al. Uma semana de crossfit(r) não modifica carga interna, sintomas de estresse e dor muscular. Rev Bras prescrição e Fisiol do Exerc. 2019 [citado 15 Mar 2020];13(84):547-53. Disponible en: http://www.rbpfex.com.br/index.php/rbpfex/article/view/1729

  58. Butcher S, Neyedly T, Horvey K, Benko C. Do physiological measures predict selected CrossFit® benchmark performance? Open Access J Sport Med. 2015;6:241-7. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2147/OAJSM.S88265

  59. Bellar D, Hatchett A, Judge L, Breaux M, Marcus L. The relationship of aerobic capacity, anaerobic peak power and experience to performance in CrossFit exercise. Biol Sport. 2015;32(4):315-20. DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.5604%2F20831862.1174771

  60. Mangine G, Stratton M, Almeda C, Roberts M, Esmat T, Van Dusseldorp T, et al. Physiological differences between advanced CrossFit athletes, recreational CrossFit participants, and physically-active adults. PLoS One. 2020;15(4):1-21. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0223548




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com