Durán G, Zamora K

Language: English
References: 18
Page: 197-203
PDF size: 608.15 Kb.

ABSTRACT

The presence of deciduous canines in adulthood may be of aesthetic concern for patients. Many clinical alternatives include surgical and orthodontic treatment. Since patients search for highly esthetic results and more conservative alternatives, the present clinical report describes a treatment for deciduous canine through an indirect composite resin veneer and an indirect composite resin fragment restoration in a premolar to improve esthetic outcomes with a one-year follow up.

REFERENCES

1. Spear F., Kokich V., Mathews D. Interdisciplinarymanagement of anterior dentalesthetics. J Am Dent Assoc. 2006; 137 (2):160-169.

2. Nahsan F., Mondelli R., Franco E., NaufelF., Ueda J., Schmitt V. et al. Clinical strategiesfor esthetic excellence in anterior toothrestorations: understanding color and compositeresin selection. J Appl Oral Sci. 2012; 20(2): 51-156.

3. Walsh L., Brostek A. Minimum interventiondentistry principles and objectives. Aust DentJ. 2013; 58: 3-16.

4. Simonsen R. From prevention to therapy:Minimal intervention with sealants andresin restorative materials. J Dent. 2011; 39:S27-S33.

5. Demarco F., Collares K., Coelho-de-SouzaF., Correa M., Cenci M., Moraes R. et al.Anterior composite restorations: A systematicreview on long-term survival and reasons forfailure. Dent Mater. 2015; 31 (10): 1214-1224.

6. Douglas R. Color stability of new-generationindirect resins for prosthodontic application.J Prosthet Dent. 2000; 83 (2): 166-170.

7. Schulze K., Marshall S., Gansky S., MarshallG. Color stability and hardness in dentalcomposites after accelerated aging. DentMater. 2003; 19 (7): 612-619.

8. Gresnigt M., Kalk W., Özcan M. RandomizedClinical Trial of Indirect Resin Compositeand Ceramic Veneers: Up to 3-year Followup.J Adhes Dent. 2013; 15 (2): 181-190.

9. Gesnigt M., Cune M. S., Jansen K., vander Made S. A. M., Özcan M. Randomizedclinical trial on indirect resin composite andceramic laminate veneers: Up to 10-yearfindings. J Dent. 2019; 86: 102-109.

10. Honda M. I., Flório F. M., Basting R. T. Effectivenessof Indirect composite resin silanizationevaluated by microtensile bond strengthtest. Am J Dent. 2008; 21 (3): 153-158.

11. Francisco S., Cappellette Junior M. Aspectsand clinical procedures of eruptive changesof permanent upper canines. Dental Press JOrthod. 2012; 17 (2): 132-139.

12. El Haddad E. Treatment of Maxillary RetainedCanine With Implants: New Perspectives.Oral Implantol (Rome). 2017; 10 (3): 343.

13. Zuiderveld E., Meijer H., Vissink A.,Raghoebar G. Immediate placement andprovisionalization of an implant after removalof an impacted maxillary canine: two casereports. Int J Implant Dent. 2015; 1 (1).

14. Montenegro P. M. A., Hara O. F. Orthodontictraction of retained upper canine withEdgewise appliances: Case report. Rev MexOrtod. 2013; 1 (1): 61-71.

15. Fernandes P. F., Almeida T. C., Sampaio-Fernandes J., Pinto M. G., Guimarães P. A.Coroas totalmente cerâmicas em caninosdecíduos: abordagem multidisciplinar. RevOdontol UNESP. 2010; 39 (6): 373-378.

16. Bin-Shuwaish M. Ceramic Veneers for Esthetic Restoration of Retained Primary Teeth: A 4-year Follow-up Case Report. Oper Dent. 2017; 42 (2): 133-142.

17. Báez Rosales A., De Nordenflycht Carvacho D., Schlieper Cacciutolo R., Gajardo Guineo M., Gandarillas Fuentes C. Conservative Approach for the Esthetic Management of Multiple Interdental Spaces: A Systematic Approach. J Esthet Restor Dent. 2015; 27 (6): 344-354.

18. Benitez Sellan P., Bresciani E. Reshaping a retained deciduous canine with a semidirect composite resin veneer: A clinical report. J Prosthet Dent. 2019. Article in Press.