Ferreira AP, Santos SB, Divino PMA, Conceição OV, Ferreira OQH, Gonçalves AG, Albano AGE

Language: Portugués
References: 32
Page: 1-18
PDF size: 542.96 Kb.

ABSTRACT

The study aimed to develop and validate the content and appearance of a checklist to evaluate the performance of the Brazilian Immunization Information System in vaccination rooms. It is a methodological study with a quantitative approach, which led to the validation of the content and appearance of the items in a checklist, structured in two dimensions: structure and process. The Delphi technique was used to validate the items according to the criteria of relevance, objectivity and clarity. The content validation index and Cronbach's alpha coefficient were calculated to analyze the internal consistency of the checklist, which consists of 7 items in the structure dimension and 17 in the process dimension, and is subdivided into 3 components: management the immunization information system; registry of the vaccinated and movement of immunobiologicals. Considering the two dimensions, the total content validation rate of the checklist was 89.6%. In the structure dimension, an average content validation index was 89.9; 89.2% was obtained in the processes dimension, and 86.2% in the management component of the Immunization Information System; 92.6% in the registry of vaccinated and 88.9% in the immunobiological movement. The checklist proved to be internally consistent, with a total Cronbach's alpha value of 0.97 and values ​​of 0.86 and 0.97 for the structure and process dimensions, respectively. Regarding the validation of the appearance, the instrument was considered intelligible. The study provides a checklist with valid content and appearance to evaluate the performance of the Brazilian Immunization Information System and supports the supervision and monitoring of the functionalities of this system in the vaccination rooms.

REFERENCES

1. Santos AF, Sobrinho DF, Araújo LL, Procópio CSD, Lopes EAS, Lima AMLD, et al. Incorporation of Information and Communication Technologies and quality of primary healthcare in Brazil. Cad Saúde Públ. 2017;33(5):e00172815.

2. Santos TO, Pereira LP, Silveira DT. Implantação de sistemas informatizados na saúde: uma revisão sistemática. RECIIS. 2017;11(3):1-11.

3. Namageyo-Funa A, Aketch M, Tabu C, Macneil A, Bloland P. Assessment of select electronic health information systems that support immunization data capture - Kenya, 2017. BMC Health Serv Res. 2018;18(1):1-7.

4. Cavalcante RB, Vasconcelos DD, Gontijo TL, Guimarães EAA, Machado RM, Oliveira VC. computerization of primary health care information systems: advances and challenges. Cogitare Enferm. 2018;23(3):54297.

5. Pinheiro ALS, Andrade KTS, Silva DO, Zacharias FCM, Gomide MFS, Pinto IC. Health management: the use of information systems and knowledge sharing for the decision making process. Tex Cont Enferm. 2016;25(3):1-9.

6. Lima KWS, Antunes JLF, Silva ZP. Percepção dos gestores sobre o uso de indicadores nos serviços de saúde. Saúde Soc. 2015;24(1):61-71.

7. Sato APS. National Immunization Program: Computerized System as a tool for new challenges. Rev Saúde Públ. 2015;49:1-5.

8. Cutts FT, Claquin P, Danovaro-Holliday MC, Rhoda DA. Monitoring vaccination coverage: Defining the role of surveys. Vaccine. 2016;34(35):44103-9.

9. Derrough T, Olsson K, Gianfredi V, Simondon F, Heijbel H, Danielsson N, et al. Immunisation information systems: useful tools for monitoring vaccination programmes in EE.UU./EEA countries 2016. Eur Surveill. 2017;22(17):1-11.

10. Muscoplat MH, Rajamani S. Immunization Information System and Informatics to Promote Immunizations: Perspective From Minnesota Immunization Information Connection. Biomed Inform Insights. 2017;9:1178222616688893.

11. Ministério da Saúde. Departamento de Informática do SUS. Sistema de Informação do Programa Nacional de Imunizações - SIPNI. Brasília (DF): Ministério da Saúde; 2019 [acesso: 20/06/2020]. Disponível em: Disponível em: http://datasus.saude.gov.br/sistemas-e- aplicativos/epidemiologicos/si-pni

12. D'Ancona F, Gianfredi V, Riccardo F, Iannazzo S. Immunisation registries at regional level in Italy and the roadmap for a future Italian National Registry. Ann Ig. 2018;30:77-85.

13. Polit DF, Yang FM. Measurement and the measurement of change. China: Wolters Kluwer; 2016.

14. Monteiro GTR, Hora HRM. Pesquisa em Saúde Pública: como desenvolver e validar instrumentos de coleta de dados. Curitiba (PR): Appris; 2013.

15. Pasquali L. Instrumentação psicológica: Fundamentos e práticas. Porto Alegre (RN): Artmed; 2010.

16. Scarparo AF, Laus AM, Azevedo ALCS, Freitas MRI, Gabriel CS, Chaves LDP. Reflexões sobre o uso da técnica Delphi em pesquisas na enfermagem. Rev Ren. 2012;13(1):242-51.

17. Silva BS, Coelho HV, Cavalcante RB, Oliveira VC, Guimarães EAA. Evaluation study of the National Immunization Program Information System. Rev Bras Enferm. 2018;71:660-69.

18. Timmins F. Surveys and questionnaires in nursing research. Nurs Stand. 2015;29(42):42-50.

19. Lucian R, Dornellas JS. Mensuração de Atitude: proposição de um protocolo de elaboração de escalas. RAC. 2015;19(2):157-77.

20. Pereira RDM, Alvim NAT. Delphi technique in dialogue with nurses on acupuncture as a proposed nursing intervention. Esc Anna Nery Rev Enferm. 2015;19(1):174-80.

21. Souza AC, Alexandre NMC, Guirardello EB. Psychometric properties in instruments: evaluation of reliability and validity. Epidemiol Serv Saúde. 2017;26(3):649-59.

22. Fuzissaki MA, Santos CB, Almeida AM, Gozzo TO, Clapis MJ. Semantic validation of an instrument to identify the nursing practice in the management of radiodermatitis. Rev Eletr Enferm. 2016;18:1142.

23. Carvalho EMP, Göttems LBD, Pires MRGM. Adherence to best care practices in normal birth: construction and validation of an instrument. Rev Esc Enferm USP. 2015;49(6):890-98.

24. Dutra VBR, Ávila SH, Mattos VLD. Validação de um instrumento de avaliação da satisfação dos discentes de cursos de graduação em Matemática. Scientia Plena. 2017;13(4),1-9.

25. Silva BS, Guimarães EAA, Oliveira VC, Cavalcante RB, Pinheiro MMK, Gontijo TL, et al. National Immunization Program Information System: implementation context assessment. BMC Health Serv Res. 2020;20(333):1-10.

26. Guimarães EAA, Morato YC, Carvalho DBF, Oliveira VC, Pivatti VMS, Cavalcante RB, et al. Evaluation of the usability of the Immunization Information System in Brazil: A Mixed-Method Study. Telemed Health. 2020; Ahead of print.

27. Morato YC, Carvalho DBF, Oliveira VC, Dias TMR, Cavalcante RB, Amaral GG, et al. Análise do Sistema de Informação em Imunizações do Brasil sob a ótica das heurísticas de usabilidade. Rev Cubana Inf Cienc Salud. 2020;31(2):e1515.

28. Oliveira VC, Guimarães EAA, Amaral GG, Silva TIM, Fabriz LA, Pinto IC. Acceptance and use of the Information System of the National Immunization Program. Rev Latino-Amer Enfermagem. 2020;28:e3307.

29. Oliveira VC, Rennó HMS, Santos YR, Rabelo AFG, Serrano MDP, Pinto IC. Educação para o trabalho em sala de vacina: percepção dos profissionais de enfermagem. Rev Enferm Cent-Oeste Min. 2016;6(3):2331-41.

30. Cardoso WS, Nascimento LCN, Dias FMV. Implantação do sistema de informação do programa nacional de imunizações Desktop. Rev Bras Pesq Saúde Viória. 2017;19(1):1-6.

31. Ministério da Saúde. Manual do usuário do SIPNI (Desktop): Módulo de cadastro de pacientes (registro vacinação individualizada) e Movimentação de imunobiológicos nas salas de vacinação. Brasília (DF): Ministério da Saúde; 2018[acesso: 19/05/2020]. Disponível em: Disponível em: http://pni.datasus.gov.br/sipni/documentos/manual_sipni.pdf

32. Salvador PTCO, Rodrigues CCFM, Lima KYN, Alves KYA, Santos VEP. Non-conventional technologies for data collection in Brazilian dissertations and theses. Rev Bras Enferm. 2015;68(2):269-77.