Yılmaz K, Tüfenkçi P

Language: Spanish
References: 22
Page: 81-89
PDF size: 205.70 Kb.

ABSTRACT

The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of using a higher rotation speed with the XP-endo Shaper (XPS) on apically extruded debris and operation time during endodontic treatment and retreatment procedures. Sixty mesial roots of mandibular first molar teeth were randomly assigned to four groups (Initial treatment groups: XPS used at 1000 or 3000rpm rotation speeds and Retreatment groups: XPS used at 1000 or 3000rpm rotation speeds). During the initial treatment and retreatment procedures preweighed eppendorf tubes were used to collect apically extruded debris, and the operation time was recorded in seconds. The extruded debris was quantified by subtracting the preinstrumentation from the postinstrumentation weight of the Eppendorf tubes. Data were analysed using two-way ANOVA at a significance level of 0.05. In all groups, the use of the XPS at 1000 or 3000rpm rotation speeds had no statistically significant effect on the amount of apically extruded debris (p›0.05). The use of the XPS at a 3000rpm rotation speed significantly decreased the instrumentation time (p‹0.05). In summary, the use of the XPS at high rotation speeds in initial treatment and retreatment procedures did not have a significant effect on the amount of apically extruded debris but significantly decreased the operation time.

REFERENCES

1. Seltzer S., Naidorf I.J. Flare-ups in endodontics: I. Etiological factors. J Endod. 1985; 11 (11): 472-8.

2. Tanalp J., Kaptan F., Sert S., Kayahan B.,Bayirl G. Quantitative evaluation of theamount of apically extruded debris using different rotary instrumentation systems.Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral RadiolEndod. 2006; 101 (2): 250-7.

3. Keskin C., Sariyilmaz E., Sariyilmaz O.Effect of solvents on apically extruded debrisand irrigant during root canal retreatmentusing reciprocating instruments. Int Endod J.2017; 50 (11): 1084-8.

4. Topçuoğlu H.S., Zan R., Akpek F., TopçuoğluG., Ulusan Ö., Aktı A., et al. Apically extrudeddebris during root canal preparationusing Vortex Blue, K3XF, ProTaper Next andReciproc instruments. Int Endod J. 2016; 49(12): 1183-7.

5. Alves F.R.F., Paiva P.L., Marceliano-AlvesM.F., Cabreira L.J., Lima K.C., SiqueiraJ.F., et al. Bacteria and Hard Tissue DebrisExtrusion and Intracanal Bacterial ReductionPromoted by XP-endo Shaper and ReciprocInstruments. J Endod. 2018; 44 (7): 1173-8.

6. Uslu G., Ozyurek T., Yılmaz K., GündoğarM., Plotino G. Apically extruded debrisduring root canal instrumentation withReciproc blue, HyFlex EDM, and XP-endoshaper nickel-titanium files. J Endod. 2018;44 (5): 856-9.

7. Webber M., Piasecki L., Jussiani E.I., AndrelloA.C., Dos Reis P.J., Azim K.A., et al.Higher Speed and No Glide Path: A NewProtocol to Increase the Efficiency of XPShaper in Curved Canals-An In Vitro Study.J Endod. 2020; 46 (1): 103-9.

8. Azim A.A., Wang H.H., Tarrosh M., AzimK.A., Piasecki L. Comparison betweenSingle-file Rotary Systems: Part 1-Efficiency,Effectiveness, and Adverse Effects inEndodontic Retreatment. J Endod. 2018; 44(11): 1720-24.

9. Silva E.J., Sa L., Belladonna F.G., NevesA.A., Accorsi-Mendonça T., Vieira V.T., etal. Reciprocating versus rotary systems forroot filling removal: assessment of the apicallyextruded material. J Endod. 2014; 40 (12):2077-80.

10. Schneider S.W. A comparison of canal preparationsin straight and curved root canals.Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol. 1971; 32(2): 271-5.

11. Myers G.L., Montgomery S. A comparisonof weights of debris extruded apically byconventional filing and Canal Master techniques.J Endod. 1991; 17 (6): 275-9.

12. Kocak S., Kocak M.M., Saglam B.C., TürkerS.A., Sağsen B., Er Ö. Apical extrusion ofdebris using self-adjusting file, reciprocatingsingle-file, and 2 rotary instrumentationsystems. J Endod. 2013; 39 (10): 1278-80.

13. Ha J.H., Kwak S.W., Kim S.K., SigurdssonA., Kim H.C. Effect from Rotational Speed onTorsional Resistance of the Nickel-titaniumInstruments. J Endod. 2017; 43 (3): 443-6.

14. Gao Y., Shotton V., Wilkinson K., PhillipsG., Johnson W.B. Effects of raw materialand rotational speed on the cyclic fatigue ofProFile Vortex rotary instruments. J Endod.2010; 36 (7): 1205-9.

15. Lopes H.P., Ferreira A.A., Elias C.N.,Moreira E.J., de Oliveira J.C., Siqueira J.F.Jr. Influence of rotational speed on the cyclicfatigue of rotary nickel-titanium endodonticinstruments. J Endod. 2009; 35 (7): 1013-16.

16. Yared G.M., Bou Dagher F.E., Machtou P.Influence of rotational speed, torque andoperator's proficiency on ProFile failures. IntEndod J. 2001; 34 (1): 47-53.

17. Kitchens G.G. Jr., Liewehr F.R., MoonP.C. The effect of operational speed on thefracture of nickel-titanium rotary instruments.J Endod. 2007; 33 (1): 52-54.

18. Versiani M.A., Carvalho K.K., Mazzi-Chaves J.F., Sousa-Neto M.D. Micro-computed tomographic evaluation of the shaping ability of XP-endo Shaper, iRaCe, and EdgeFile systems in long oval-shaped canals. J Endod. 2018; 44 (3): 489-95.

19. de Hemptinne F., Slaus G., Vandendael M., Jacquet W., De Moor R.J., Bottenberg P. In vivo intracanal temperature evolution during endodontic treatment after the injection of room temperature or preheated sodium hypochlorite. J Endod. 2015; 41 (7): 1112-5.

20. Hachmeister D.R., Schindler W.G., Walker W.A. 3rd, Thomas D.D. The sealing ability and retention characteristics of mineral triox-ide aggregate in a model of apexification. J Endod. 2002; 28 (5): 386-90.

21. Stefopoulos S., Tsatsas D.V., Kerezoudis N.P., Eliades G. Comparative in vitro study of the sealing efficiency of white vs grey Pro-root mineral trioxide aggregate formulas as apical barriers. Dent Traumatol. 2008; 24 (2): 207-13.

22. Altundasar E., Nagas E., Uyanik O., Serper A. Debris and irrigant extrusion potential of 2 rotary systems and irrigation needles. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2011; 112 (4): e31-35.