Castro-Rodríguez Y

Language: Spanish
References: 19
Page: 34-46
PDF size: 233.83 Kb.

ABSTRACT

The objective of this study was to relate the degree of satisfaction that graduates had with the supervisory approach during the development of the undergraduate thesis. A cross-sectional study, including 102 graduate students from the Faculty of Dentistry of the Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcos. Lima. Peru. The survey technique was used to collect information on the satisfaction of the thesis supervision (valued on a score from 1 to 6, where higher scores showed greater satisfaction) and the supervisor's approach. Results showed that 59% of supervisors had a collaborative approach, 29.6% a non-directive approach. Collaborative supervisors obtained a higher satisfaction score (5.2±0.7) while the directive approach obtained the lowest score (3.3±0.5) (p‹0.05). Women presented a higher satisfaction score (5.4±0.2 vs 4.8±0.4) (p‹0.05). There is a relationship between the collaborative supervision style and greater student satisfaction during the thesis process. Students indicated being less satisfied with the managerial supervision style of the thesis.

REFERENCES

1. Castro-Rodríguez Y., Lara R.V., Pares G.B., Castillo Q.S. Validez de contenido y estructura de una escala sobre las limitantes para la elaboración de una tesis universitaria. Educación Médica Superior. 2020; 34 (2): e1943.

2. López J.Y. Creatividad e investigación. La dirección/asesoramiento de tesis. Ideas para un manual de buenas prácticas. En: Ríos, J. O. y Ramirez, C. A. La información y sus contextos en el cambio social. Instituto de Investigaciones Bibliotecológicas y de la Información. Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México; 2015: p.215-225.

3. De Kleijn R.A., Meijer P.C., Pilot A., Brekelmans M. The relation between feedback perceptions and the supervisor–student relationship in master’s thesis projects. Teaching in Higher Education. 2014; 19 (4): 336-349.

4. Ismail A., Jui M.K., Sham F.M., Faqih, Abdullah N. Effect of mentoring program on mentees’ academic performance from an islamic Perspective. Islamiyyat. 2015; 37 (1): 29-38.

5. Grant B., Graham A. Naming the Game: reconstructing graduate supervision. Teaching in Higher Education. 1999; 4 (1): 77-89.

6. Dysthe O. Professors as Mediators of Academic Text Cultures: An Interview Study with Advisors and Master’s Degree Students in Three Disciplines in a Norwegian University. Written Communication. 2002; 19 (4): 493-544.

7. Glickman C.D., Gordon S.P., Ross-Gordon J.M. The basic guide to supervision and instructional leadership. 3rd ed. Pearson Education, Inc; 2013.

8. Aldosari D.M., Ibrahim A.S. The Relationship Between Interpersonal Approaches of Thesis Supervisors and Graduate StudentSatisfaction. International Education Studies. 2019; 12 (10): 96-112.

9. Ylijoki O. Master’s Thesis Writing from a Narrative Approach. Studies in Higher Education. 2001; 26 (1): 21-34.

10. Castro R.Y. La tesis universitaria. Algunos mitos, reflexiones y cuentos de terror. 1era ed. Lima; 2020.

11. García-Grajales J. ¿Miedo a realizar una tesis una tesis universitaria? Una serie de recomendaciones para evitar la tortura en su elaboración. Ciencia y Mar. 2019; 23 (67): 53-65.

12. Erichsen E.A., Bolliger D.U., Halupa C. Student satisfaction with graduate supervision in doctoral programs primarily delivered in distance education settings. Studies in Higher Education. 2014; 39 (2): 321-338.

13. Al-Sakraan A.F. Developmental vision of the role of the academic supervisor of theses, dissertations, and complementary research of postgraduate students in departments of education at Al-Imam Muhammad Ibn Saud Islamic University. Journal of Educational Sciences. 2016; 6: 5-71.Attribution (BY-NC) - (BY) You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggest the licensor endorses you or your use. (NC) You may not use the material for commercial purposes.

14. Ferrer de Valero Y., Malaver M. Factores que inciden en el Síndrome Todo Menos Tesis (TMT) en las maestrías de la Universidad del Zulia. Opción. 2000; 16 (31): 112-29.

15. Quero J. Concepción del tutor como alternativa en las tesis de grado. Universitas. 2000; 16 (1): 105-21.

16. Ibrahim A. Directive, collaborative, or non-directive? Thesis supervision approaches in the United Arab Emirates. Issues in Educational Research. 2018; 28 (3): 679-700.

17. Arias F. Mitos y errores en la elaboración de tesis y proyectos de investigación. Caracas, Venezuela: Episteme; 2001.

18. Thompson P. Thesis and dissertation writing. En B. Paltridge, & S. Starfield (eds.). The handbook of English for Specific Purposes. Londres: Wiley-Blackwell; 2013. pp. 283-299

19. Revilla D. Expectativas y tensiones en la asesoría de tesis en la Facultad de Educación de la Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú. Revista Docencia Universitaria. 2017; 15 (1): 277-303.