medigraphic.com

2021, Number 4

<< Back Next >>

Rev Elec Psic Izt 2021; 24 (4)

Compliance and dominance in leadership dynamics: an initial Japan/Mexico comparison

Camacho I, Hernández RJM, Arroyo HR

Language: Spanish
References: 42
Page: 1347-1369
PDF size: 373.54 Kb.


ABSTRACT

This paper constitutes an initial exploration in leadership social dynamics. It presents data derived from the measurement of actual verbal interactions occurring during leadership emergence in a dyad context. A between-group design was employed in which eight participants were divided into four dyads; two dyads conformed by Mexican only and two by Japanese only participants. Members of each dyad had to communicate and collaborate to solve a digital task called The Assembly Task during which their verbal interactions were recorded, coded and analyzed as well as their task performance. Results showed that when there is balance, in terms of dominance and compliance, between participants their collective productivity is enhanced independently of nationality. Discussion focuses on data commonalities found between nationalities and argues for the importance of introducing “face to face” dyad level analysis in the field of leadership in organizational psychology.


REFERENCES

  1. Alimo-Metcalfe, B. (2013). A critical review of leadership. En H. Skipton, R. Lewis,A. M. Freedman y J. Passmore (Eds.) The Wiley-Blackwell Handbook of thePsychology of leadership, change and organizational development. Malden:Wiley-Blackwell.

  2. Alvesson, M. y Einola, K. (2019). Warning for excessive positivity: authenticleadership and other traps in leadership studies. The Leadership Quarterly,

  3. 30, 383-3953. Anonson, J. M.S., Ferguson, L., Macdonald, M. B., Murray, B. L., Fowler-Kerry, S.y Baily, J. M. G. (2009). The anatomy of interpersonal leadership. An investigation on leadership Behaviors in team-based health care. Journal ofLeadership Studies, 3 (3), 17-25.

  4. Bass, B. M. (1985). Leadership and performance beyond expectations. New York:Free Press.

  5. Boudreau, J. W. y Ramstad, P.M. (2007). Beyond HR: The new science of humancapital. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.

  6. Burnes, B. (2013). A critical review of Organizational Development. En H. Skipton,R. Lewis, A. M. Freedman y J. Passmore (Eds.) The Wiley-BlackwellHandbook of the Psychology of leadership, change and organizationaldevelopment. Malden, US: Wiley-Blackwell.

  7. Caetano, A. y Santos, S.C. (2017). The gap between research and professionalpractice in work and organizational psychology: Tensions, beliefs andopinions. En Rabelo, E. N., Vaz, C. T. y Mendoҫa, H. (Eds.) OrganizationalPsychology and evidence-based management. What science says aboutpractice. Switzerland: Springer.

  8. Camacho, I, Arroyo, R., Ramos, V. y Hernández, J.M. (2017). Primacíacompetencial y liderazgo participativo: Un Programa de InvestigaciónInterconductual. Revista Mexicana de Análisis de la Conducta, 43, 348-368.

  9. Camacho, I. y Jiménez, G. (2020). Evaluación del rol de la jerarquía social en ladinámica del liderazgo. Conductual, Revista Internacional deInterconductismo y Análisis de la Conducta, 8 (1), 28-42.

  10. Day, D. V. y Antonakis, J. (2013). The future of leadership. En H. Skipton, R.Lewis, A. M. Freedman y J. Passmore (Eds.) The Wiley-BlackwellHandbook of the Psychology of leadership, change and organizationaldevelopment. Malden, US: Wiley-Blackwell.

  11. Fiedler, F. E. (1967). A theory of leadership effectiveness. New York: McGraw-Hill.

  12. Gerstner, Ch. R. y Day, D. (1994). Cross cultural comparison of leadershipprototypes. The Leadership Quarterly, 5 (2), 121-134.

  13. Glynn, M. A. y DeJordy, R. (2010). Leadership Through an organization behaviorlens: a look at the last half century of research. En Nohria, N. y R. Khurana,R.(Eds.) Handbook of leadership. Theory and practice. An HBS centennialColloquium on advancing leadership. Boston, Massachusetts: HarvardBusiness Press.

  14. House, R. J., Hanges, P. J., Javidan, M., Dorfman, P. W. y Gupta, V. (2004).Culture, leadership and organizations: The GLOBE study of 62 societies.Thousand Oaks CA: Sage Publications

  15. Hayes, L. (2001). Finding our place in a constructed future. En L. Hayes, J. A.,Austin, R. Houmanfar, y M.C. Clayton (Eds.), Organizational Change. Reno,Nevada: Context Press.

  16. Hofstede, G. (1980). Culture’s consequences. International differences in workrelatedvalues. Beverly Hills, California: Sage.

  17. Jago, A. G. y Ragan, J. W. (1986). The trouble with Leader Match is that it doesn’tmatch Fiedler’s contingency model. Journal of Applied Psychology, 71, 555-559.

  18. Javian, M., Dorfman, P. W., Howell, J. P. y Hanges, P. J. (2010). Leadership andcultural context. A theoretical and empirical examination based on ProjectGLOBE. En N. Nohria y R. Khurana (Eds.). Handbook of leadership. Theoryand practice. An HBS centennial Colloquium on advancing leadership.Boston, Massachusetts: Harvard Business Press.

  19. Javidan M. y Carl, D. E. (2005). Leadership across cultures: A Study of Canadianand Taiwanese executives. Management International Review, 45, 23-44.

  20. Johnson, C. M., Redmon, W. K. y Mawhinney, T. C. (2001). Handbook oforganizational Performance. Behavior Analysis and Management. NewYork: Routledge.

  21. Kahng, S., Ingvarsson, E., Quigg, A. N., Seckinger, K. E. y Teichman, H. M.(2011). Defining and measuring behavior. En Fisher, W. W., Piazza, C. C. yRoane, H. S. (Eds.) Handbook of Applied Behavior Analysis. New York: theGuilford Press.

  22. Kim, J., Yammarino, F., Dionne, S., Eckardt, R., Cheong, M., Tsai, C., Guo, J. yPark, J. W. (2019). State of the science review of leader-follower dyadsresearch. The Leadership Quarterly, 31 (1), DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2019.101306

  23. Kitchener, R. F. (1977). Behavior and Behaviorism. Behaviorism, 5, 11-71.

  24. Komaki, J. L. (1998). Leadership from an operant perspective. New York:Routledge.

  25. Komaki, J. L., Zlotnick, S. y Jensen, M. (1986). Development of an operant-basedtaxonomy and observational index of supervisory behavior. Journal ofApplied Psychology, 71, 260-269.

  26. Lattal, D. y Porritt, M. (2008). Translating the science of behavior analysis to theworkplace: one company’s 30 year effort. Revista Mexicana de Psicología,25 (1), 27-44.

  27. Lawler, E. E. III (2008). Talent. Making people your competitive advantage. SanFrancisco: Jossey-Bass.

  28. Mattaini, M. y Holtschneider, C. (2017). Collective leadership and circles: notinvented here. Journal of Organizational Behavior Management, 37(2), 126-141.

  29. Mawhinney, T. C. (2000). OBM today and tomorrow: then and now. Journal ofOrganizational Behavior Management, 20(3/4), 73-137.

  30. Mawhinney, T. C. (2006). Effective leadership in superior-subordinate dyads.Journal of Organizational Behavior Management, 25(4), 37-79. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1300/J075v25n04_03.

  31. Muchinsky, P. M. (2012). Psychology applied to work: An introduction to industrialand organizational psychology. (10a. ed.). US: Hypergraphic Press.

  32. Neilson, G. L. y Pasternack, B. A. (2005). Results: Keep what’s good, fix what’swrong and unlock great performance. New York: Crown Business.

  33. Nohria, N. y Khurana R. (2010). Handbook of leadership. Theory and practice. AnHBS centennial Colloquium on advancing leadership. Boston,Massachusetts: Harvard Business Press.

  34. Patterson, G. R. y Reid, J. B. (1970). Reciprocity and coercion. En J. L. Neuringer,y Ch. Michael (Eds.) Behavior modification in clinical psychology. New York:Appleton Century Crofts.

  35. Requero, B., Gandarillas, B., Santos, D., Paredes, B., García, L., y Briñol, P.(2017). El efecto del foco regulatorio sobre el rendimiento y la evaluación dela formación en el contexto de las organizaciones. Revista Mexicana dePsicología, 34(2), 134-141.

  36. Riggio R. E. (2003). Introduction to industrial/organizational psychology. NewJersey, US: Prentice Hall.

  37. Sidman, M. y Tailby, W. (1982). Conditional discrimination vs. matching to sample:an expansion of the testing paradigm. Journal of the Experimental Analysisof Behavior, 37, 5–22. DOI:10.1901/jeab.1982.37-5.

  38. Thompson, R. H. y Borrero, J. C. (2011). Direct observation. En W. W. Fisher, C.C. Piazza, y H. S. Roane (Eds.) Handbook of Applied Behavior Analysis.New York: the Guilford Press.

  39. Thorndike, R. L. y Hagen, E. (1980). Measurement and evaluation in psychologyand education. (5a. ed.). New York: John Wiley and Sons Inc.

  40. Uhl-Bien, M. (2006). Relational Leadership Theory: Exploring the social processesof leadership and organizing. The Leadership Quarterly, 17, 654-676. DOI10.1016/j.leaqua.2006.10.007.

  41. Yi Liu y Hong Li (2017). Unpacking the relationship between value andempowering behaviors of leaders. Psychology and Behavioral Sciences, 6(5), 79-89.

  42. Yukl, G. (1999) An evaluation of conceptual weaknesses in transformational andcharismatic leadership theories. The Leadership Quarterly,10, 285-305.




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com