medigraphic.com
ISSN 1561-297X (Print)

2020, Number 3

<< Back Next >>

Rev Cubana Estomatol 2020; 57 (3)

Histological Findings’ Associated with Gingivectomy with Er, Cr: YSGG (2780 nm) Laser

Trujillo HM, Blanco FP, Llamas GJ, Barrios GL, Orozco PJ

Language: Spanish
References: 16
Page: 1-12
PDF size: 482.49 Kb.


ABSTRACT

Introduction: When performing a surgical intervention, the cutting instrument used is especially important, since it is associated with intraoperative and postoperative signs and symptoms and to the time of tissue repair. In response to this, new instruments have been proposed over time, particularly laser technology has been undergoing rapid and significant advancement and is currently used for countless dental treatments. Laser has been attributed different advantages in periodontal cosmetic surgery: from facilitating the hemostasis process, to stimulating the tissue repair process. However, it is pertinent to carry out studies that prove, at histological level, the changes in the oral mucosa and obtain information that allows us to know how it influences the tissue repair process.
Objective: To describe the histological findings associated with the Er, Cr: YSGG (2780 nm) laser cut in gum samples obtained by gingivectomy.
Case presentation: Female patient, 21 years old, systemically healthy. She attended the consultation for presenting aesthetic dissatisfaction when smiling. She was diagnosed with exposure of keratinized gum band greater than 4 mm. As part of the treatment plan, Er, Cr: YSGG (Waterlase®, BIOLASE®, 2780 nm) laser gingivectomy was indicated. The procedure was performed only under topical anesthesia. Histological samples of gingival tissue were taken for histological analysis.
Conclusions: The Er, Cr: YSGG (2780 nm) laser preserved the morphology of the fibroblasts after the cut. There was no evidence of carbonization or deepening of the thermal injury in the tissue. In this case, this instrument was a very useful tool for the performance of the treatment. It had important advantages, such as the absence of postoperative pain, good hemostasis, and almost complete epithelial repair in just four days.


REFERENCES

  1. Maiman T. Stimulated optical radiation in Ruby. Nature. 1960;187(4736):493-4. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/187493a0

  2. Nazemisalman B, Farsadeghi M, Sokhansanj M. Types of lásers and their applications in pediatric dentistry. J Lásers Med Sci. 2015;6(3):96-101. DOI: https://doi.org/10.15171/jlms.2015.01

  3. Davoudi A, Sanei M, Badrian H. Application of Láser Irradiation for Restorative Treatments. Open Dent J. 2016;10:636-42. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2174/1874210601610010636

  4. Castellanos JF, Beitia DA, Rodríguez YA. Láser en odontología: fundamentos físicos y biológicos. Universitas Odontológica. 2016;35(75):2. DOI: https://doi.org/10.11144/Javeriana.uo35-75.loff

  5. Moradas M. Estado actual del láser en odontología conservadora: indicaciones, ventajas y posibles riesgos. Revisión bibliográfica. Av Odontoestomatol. 2016 [acceso 19/12/2019];32(6):309-15. Disponible en: http://scielo.isciii.es/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0213-12852016000600004&lng=es

  6. Kumar G, Rehman F, Chaturvedy V. Soft Tissue Applications of Er, Cr: YSGG Láser in Pediatric Dentistry. Int J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2017;10(2):188-92. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10005-1432

  7. Fekrazad R, Moharrami M, Chiniforush N. The Esthetic Crown Lengthening by Er;Cr: YSGG láser: A Case Series. J Lásers Med Sci. 2018;9(4):283-7. DOI: https://doi.org/10.15171/jlms.2018.50

  8. Luke AM, Mathew S, Altawash MM, Madan BM. Lásers: a review with their applications in oral medicine. J Lásers Med Sci. 2019;10(4):324-329. doi:10.15171/jlms.2019.52.

  9. Alfergany MA, Nasher R, Gutknecht N. Antibacterial effect of using the Er: YAG láser or Er, Cr: YSGG láser compared to conventional instrumentation method -a literature review. Lásers in Dental Science. 2018;2(1):1-12. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s41547-017-0016-x

  10. Lamba AK, Aggarwal K, Faraz F, Tandon S, Chawla K. Er, Cr: YSGG láser for the treatment of ankyloglossia. Indian J Dent. 2015;6(3):149-52. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4103/0975-962X.163049

  11. Jin JY, Lee SH, Yoon HJ. A comparative study of wound healing following incision with a scalpel, diode láser or Er,Cr:YSGG láser in guinea pig oral mucosa: A histological and immunohistochemical analysis. Acta Odontol Scand. 2010;68(4):232-8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3109/00016357.2010.492356

  12. Hegde R, Padhye A, Sumanth S, Jain AS, Thukral N. Comparison of surgical stripping; erbium-doped:yttrium, aluminum, and garnet láser; and carbon dioxide láser techniques for gingival depigmentation: a clinical and histologic study. J Periodontol. 2013;84(6):738-48. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.2012.120094

  13. Cercadillo I, España A, Arnabat J, Valmaseda E, Berini L, Gay C. Histologic evaluation of thermal damage produced on soft tissues by CO2, Er,Cr:YSGG and diode lásers. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal. 2010;15(6):e912-8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4317/medoral.15.e912

  14. España A, Arnabat J, Berini L, Gay C. Aplicaciones del láser en Odontología. RCOE. 2004[acceso 19/12/2019];9(5): 497-511. Disponible en: http://scielo.isciii.es/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1138-123X2004000500002&lng=es

  15. Rowan MP, Cancio LC, Elster EA, Burmeister DM, Rose LF, Natesan S, et al. Burn wound healing and treatment: review and advancements. Crit Care. 2015;19(1):243. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13054-015-0961-2

  16. Ryu SW, Lee SH, Yoon HJ. A comparative histological and immunohistochemical study of wound healing following incision with a scalpel, CO2 láser or Er, Cr: YSGG láser in the guinea pig oral mucosa. Acta Odontologica Scandinavica. 2012;70(6):448-54. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3109/00016357.2011.635598




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com