medigraphic.com
ISSN 1561-2937 (Print)

2021, Number 1

<< Back Next >>

Rev Cubana Cardiol Cir Cardiovasc 2021; 27 (1)

Permanent pacemaker for congenital cardiac and postsurgical lesions

Naranjo UAM, Socarrás GO, Aguilera SE, Benítez RDB, González GA, Domínguez GME

Language: Spanish
References: 39
Page: 2-9
PDF size: 167.40 Kb.


ABSTRACT

Objectives: To describe the indications for permanent pacemaker placement from 2010 to 2020 at the William Pediatric Cardiocenter and to characterize the congenital or postsurgical lesions that motivated its indication.
Method: Observational, descriptive and cross-sectional study. A review of the records of the patients who received permanent pacemakers in the period studied was performed. They were distributed according to placement method and cause.
Results: werw placed 217 devices , 76% for hemodynamics or endocavitary, the rest for surgery or epicardial. The male sex predominated. Congenital atrioventricular block was the most frequent diagnosis and Tetralogy of Fallot and Mustard surgery the most related to the diagnosis of secondary block.
Conclusions: Most frequent indications for pacemaker implantation surgery occur significantly in infants and preschool patients. The indication for surgery or epicardial is reserved for patients in whom the option is difficult due to hemodynamics.


REFERENCES

  1. Kusumoto FM, Schoenfeld MH, Barrett C, Edgerton JR, Ellenbogen KA, Gold MR, Goldschlager NF, et al. 2018 ACC/AHA/HRS Guideline on the Evaluation and Management of Patients With Bradycardia and Cardiac Conduction Delay: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Clinical Practice Guidelines and the Heart Rhythm Society. J Am Coll Cardiol [Internet] 2019 [citado 20 May 20];74(7):e51-e156. Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2018.10.044

  2. Echazabal LM, Cruz SR, Hernández LN, Díaz NJ. Características clínicas de pacientes que recibieron implante, reimplante o cambio de generador de marcapasos permanentes. Revista Finlay. 2018;8(4):291-8.

  3. Merin O, Ilan M, Oren A, Fink D, Deeb M, Bitran D, et al. Permanent pacemaker implantation following cardiac surgery: Indications and long-term follow-up. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2009; 32(1):7–12.

  4. Al-Ghamdia B, Mallawi Y, Shafquat A , Ledesma A, AlRuwaili N, Shoukri M, Khan S. Predictors of permanent pacemaker implantation after coronary artery bypass grafting and valve surgery in adult patients in current surgical era. Cardiol Res .2016;7(4):123-129.

  5. Smerup M, Hjertholm T, Johnsen SP, Pedersen AK, Hansen PS, Mortensen PT and cols. Pacemaker implantation after congenital heart surgery: risk and prognosis in a population-based follow-up study. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2005;28:61–8.

  6. Gonzalez MC , Salgado G, Moreno GE, Ignacio BI, Sciegata A. Clinical predictors of permanent injury to the atrioventricular conduction system after congenital heart disease surgery. A new perspective on an old problem. Prog Pediatr Cardiol [Internet] 2016 [citado 20 May 20]; Disponible en: http://dxdoiorg/101016/jppedcard201612002.

  7. Rutledge JM, Nihill MR, Fraser CD. Outcome of 121 patients with congenitally corrected transposition of the great arteries. Pediatr Cardiol. 2002;23:137–45.

  8. Fryda RJ, Kaplan S, Helmsworth JA. Postoperative complete heart block in children. British Heart Journal, I971, 33, 456-462.

  9. Ming Wang TK, Arroyo D, Martin A, McGeorge A, Gillham M. Permanent pacemaker implantation after cardiac surgery: rates, predictors and a novel risk score. NZMJ 2018;131(1473):88-91.

  10. Romer AJ, Tabbutt S, Etheridge SP, Fischbach P, Ghanayem NS, Reddy VM, and cols. Atrioventricular block after congenital heart surgery: Analysis from the pediatric cardiac critical care consortium. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2019 ;157(3)1168-1177.

  11. Samir R, Diab OA, Morttada A, Aboulmaaty M. Permanent pacing in infants and children: A single center experience in implantation and follow up. Egypt Heart J. 2011;63(3–4):183–9.

  12. Kho J, Ioannou A, O’Sullivan K, Jones M. Permanent pacemaker implantation rates following cardiac surgery in the modern era. Irish Journal of Medical Science. 2020;1971:6.

  13. Benítez DB, Cabrera OM, Lambert JM, Pérez de Ordaz LB, Machado SO, Naranjo UA et al. Arritmias posquirúrgicas inmediatas tras la corrección de las cardiopatías congénitas. Rev Cubana Pediatr. 2017;89(4)

  14. Clarke TSO, Zaidi AM, Clarke B. Leadless Pacemakers: practice and promise in congenital heart disease. J congenit cardiol [Internet]. 2017;1(1). Disponible en: http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40949-017-0007-5

  15. Castellanos R, Segura LA, Sanchén A, Ferrer IM. Presencia de complicaciones sépticas en marcapasos endocárdicos definitivos. AMC [Internet]. 2012 [citado 15 May 2017];16(5):[aprox.12p]. Disponible en: http://scielo.sld.cu/scielo.php?script= sci_arttext& pid=S1025-02552012000500006.

  16. Cano Pérez Ó, Pombo Jiménez M, Coma Samartín R. Spanish Pacemaker Registry. Twelfth official report of the Spanish society of cardiology working group on cardiac pacing (2014). Rev Esp Cardiol (Engl Ed). 2015;68(12):1138–53.

  17. Castro HJ, Zayas R, Fayad RY, Díaz PC, Dorticós BF, Prohías M J et al. . Estimulación bicameral en la miocardiopatía hipertrófica obstructiva subaórtica: información preliminar Rev cuba cardiol cir cardiovasc ; 1999; 13(1): 13-8

  18. Bueno JZ, ; Méndez, T; Lara, J; González, C. Marcapasos subpectoral en la prevención de la necrosis del bolsillo Rev Cuba Med. 1985;24(11):1218-23.

  19. Castro HJ. Apuntes sobre la historia de los marcapasos en Cuba. Rev Cubana Cardiol Cir Cardiovasc.2011; 17(2):131-33.

  20. Cabrera OM, Alemán FA, Benítez RD. Implantación de marcapaso endocavitario en un niño de 2 años por fallo del sistema epicárdico. Rev Cubana Cardiol 2013; 19(2) : 62-65.

  21. Marcano LE, Selman-Housein SE. Registro electrónico de pacientes "delfos" en cardiología y cirugía cardiovascular pediátrica. CorSalud 2015 Ene-Mar;7(1):19-27.

  22. Kerola T, Eranti A, Aro AL, Haukilahti MA, Holkeri A, Junttila MJ, et al. Risk factors associated with atrioventricular block. JAMA Netw Open. 2019;2(5):e194176

  23. Zhang T, Liu Y, Zou C, Zhang H. Single chamber permanent epicardial pacing for children with congenital heart disease after surgical repair. J Cardiothorac Surg. 2016;11(1):61.

  24. Steyers CM 3rd, Khera R, Bhave P. Pacemaker dependency after cardiac surgery: A systematic review of current evidence. PLoS One. 2015;10(10):e0140340.

  25. Sachweh JS, Vazquez-Jimenez JF, Schöndube FA, Daebritz SH, Dörge H, Mühler EG, et al. Twenty years experience with pediatric pacing: epicardial and transvenous stimulation. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2000;17(4):455–61.

  26. Batra AS, Wells WJ, Hinoki KH, Stanton RA, Silka MJ. Late recovery of atrioventricular conduction after pacemaker implantation for complete heart block associated with surgery for congenital heart disease. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2003;125:1291-3.

  27. Patel AM, Verma D, Sheng-Fang J, Lau KL, Jerry L, Arrellano JL et al. Permanent pacemaker implantation early after cardiac surgery: A descriptive study of pacemaker utility after one year of follow-up. J Card Surg 2016;31:132–138.

  28. Costa R, Da Silva KR, Martinelli Filho M, Carrillo R. Minimally invasive epicardial pacemaker implantation in neonates with congenital heart block. Arq Bras Cardiol. 2017;109(4):331-9.

  29. Ward DE, Signy M, Oldershaw P, Jones S, Shinebourne EA. Cardiac pacing in children. Archives of Disease in Childhood, 1982, 57, 514-520.

  30. Naranjo A. Guía de actuación asistencial del departamento de cirugía cardiovascular. Cardiocentro Pediátrico “William Soler”. Red de la Sociedad Cubana de Cirugía. [Internet] 2009 [citado 16 Mar 2011] [10 pag] Disponible en : http://www.sld.cu/galerias/pdf/uvs/cirured/guia_de_actuacion_asistencial_ccvped.pdf.

  31. Costa R, Da Silva KR, Martinelli Filho M, Tamaki WT, Sartori Crevelari E, Pinho Moreira LF. Permanent cardiac pacing in children with postoperative bradycardia: long-term follow-up. Braz J Cardiovasc Surg 2005; 20(4): 392-397.

  32. Chubb H, O’Neill M, Rosenthal E. Pacing and defibrillators in complex congenital heart disease. Arrhythm Electrophysiol Rev. 2016;5(1):57–64.

  33. Song J, Liang Z, Wang Y. Incidence of permanent pacemaker implantation after valve replacement surgery. Herz[Internet] 2020[citado 16 May 2019]. Disponible en https://doi.org/10.1007/s00059-020-04895-2.

  34. Sayk F, Krüger S, Bechtel JFM, Feller AC, Sievers HH, Bartels C. Significant damage of the conduction system during cardioplegic arrest is due to necrosis not apoptosis. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2004;25(5):801–6.

  35. Andersen HØ, de Leval MR, Tsang VT, Elliott MJ, Anderson RH, Cook AC. Is complete heart block after surgical closure of ventricular septum defects still an issue? Ann Thorac Surg. 2006;82(3):948–56.

  36. Ceresnak SR, Pass RH, Starc TJ, Hordof AJ, Bonney WJ, Mosca RS, et al. Predictors for hemodynamic improvement with temporary pacing after pediatric cardiac surgery. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2011;141(1):183–7.

  37. Umamaheshwar KL, Singh AS, Sivakumar K. Endocardial transvenous pacing in patients with surgically palliated univentricular hearts: A review on different techniques, problems and management. Indian Pacing Electrophysiol J. 2019;19(1):15–22.

  38. Arnold AD, Howard JP, Chiew K, Kerrigan WJ, de Vere F, Johns HT, et al. Right ventricular pacing for hypertrophic obstructive cardiomyopathy: meta-analysis and meta-regression of clinical trials. Eur Heart J Qual Care Clin Outcomes. 2019;5(4):321–33.

  39. Silvetti MS, Drago F, Di Carlo D, Placidi S, Brancaccio G, Carotti A. Cardiac pacing in paediatric patients with congenital heart defects: transvenous or epicardial? Europace. 2013;15(9):1280–6.




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com