medigraphic.com
ISSN 1726-6718 (Electronic)
Revista Cubana de Anestesiología y Reanimación

2021, Number 1

<< Back Next >>

Revista Cubana de Anestesiología y Reanimación 2021; 20 (1)

Assessment of the efficacy of improved recovery protocols in cardiac surgery. Randomized Clinical Trial Protocol

Agüero MMO, Abi-Rezk MN, Ortega HR, Barreto PJ, Cruz BR, Colao JY, Padrón MFD, Rodríguez RK, Herrera AM, Hidalgo AT, Vásquez BB, Valdés OM

Language: Spanish
References: 44
Page: 1-12
PDF size: 385.09 Kb.


ABSTRACT

Introduction: There are multiple articles published that address the subject of open science and its importance for society, especially for the research community. This constitutes, inevitably, the present and future of scientific journals as a method of expanding research with high quality and credibility. Open science, as a movement, has several components including the management of citations and references of data, codes and materials, which support the need for authors to have available the underlying content of the articles published and constituting the base for the results obtained in each investigation.
Objective: Assessment of the efficacy of improved recovery protocols in cardiac surgery.
Methods: The proposed protocol was prepared by the main researcher (Cuban public registry of clinical trials: RPCEC00000304) and is described according to the recommendations of the international checklist for clinical trials (SPIRIT).
Conclusions: They would be related to whether it can be demonstrated, after the end of the investigation, if the protocol reason for the intervention is better, equal to, or worse than the control protocol.


REFERENCES

  1. Lujungqvist O, Scott M, Fearon KC. Enhanced Recovery after surgery A Review. JAMA Surgery. 2017;1-7. https://doi.org/10.1001%2Fjamasurg.2016.4952.

  2. Melnyk M, Casey RG, Black P, Koupparis A J. Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocols: Time to change practice? Can Urol Assoc J. 2012;5(4):342-8. https://doi.org/10.5489%2FCUAJ.11002

  3. Senturk J, Kristo G, Gold J, Bleday R, Whang E. The Development of Enhanced Recovery After Surgery Across Surgical Specialties. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech. 2017;27(9):863-70.

  4. Agüero MO. Protocolos de recuperación precoz en cirugía cardiaca? Utopia o realidad? Rev Cub Anest Rean. 2018[acceso: 26/12/2018];17(2). Disponible en: Disponible en: http://www.revanestesia.sld.cu

  5. Fleming IO, Garratt C, Guha R, Desai J, Chaubey S, Wang Y, et al. Aggregation of marginal gains in cardiac surgery: feasibility of a perioperative care bundle for enhanced recovery in cardiac surgical patient. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2016;30(3):665-70. http://dx.doi.org/10.1053/j.vca.2016.01.017

  6. Terese T, Horlocker MD, HonorioT, Benzon MD, David LB. Anestesia regional en el paciente anticoagulado: Definición de riesgos. Rev Colomb Anestesiol. 2005[acceso: 26/12/02018];33(1). Disponible en: Disponible en: http://www.scielo.org.co/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0120-33472005000100006

  7. Liu SS, Block BM, Christopher LW. Effects of perioperative central neuraxial analgesia on outcome after coronary artery bypass surgery. A Meta-analysis. Anesthesiol Clin. 2004;101(1):153-61.

  8. Hejimans JH. Fast track minimally invasive aortic valve surgery: patient selection and optimizing. Eur Heart J Suppl. 2017;19(sppl A1):A8-14. https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/suw056

  9. Lena P, Balarac N, Lena D, De la Chapelle A, Arnulf JJ, Mihoubi A, et al. Fast-track anesthesia with remifentanil and spinal analgesia for cardiac surgery: The effect on pain control and quality of recovery. J cardiothorac vasc anesth. 2008;22(4):536-42.

  10. Jakobsen CJ. High thoracic epidural in cardiac anesthesia: A Review. Semin Cardiothorac vasc anesth. 2014. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F1089253214548764

  11. Kowalski S, Goldie D, Maguire D, Arora R C, Girling I, Fransoo R, et al. High spinal anesthesia combined with general anesthesia versus general anesthesia alone?: a retrospective cohort study in cardiac surgical patients. Acta Anaesth Belg. 2019;70(2):63-70.

  12. Bakhtiary F, Therapidis P, Dzemali O, Koray AK, Ackermann H, Meininger D. Impact of high thoracic epidural anesthesia on incidence of perioperative atrial fibrillation in off-pump coronary bypass grafting: A prospective randomized study. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surgery. 2007;134:460-4.

  13. Chaney MA. Intrathecal and epidural anesthesia and analgesia for cardiac surgery. Anesth analg. 2006;102:45-6.

  14. Agüero MO. Métodos anestésicos multimodales en el procedimiento quirúrgico de revascularización miocárdica sin circulación extracorpórea. Ensayo clínico aleatorizado y metanálisis. Hospital Clínico Quirúrgico Hermanos Ameijeiras: Universidad de Ciencias Médicas de la Habana; 2012[acceso: 23/01/2018]. Disponible en: Disponible en: http://tesis.repo.sld.cu

  15. Travis M, Wegner R, Hernandez N, Jae W. L, Choi W, K. Eltzschig H, et al. Assessment of a multimodal analgesia protocol to allow the implementation of enhanced recovery after cardiac surgery: Retrospective analysis of patient outcomes. J Clin Anesth. 2019;54:76-80. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinane.2018.10.035

  16. Zaouter C, Imbault J, Labrousse L, Abdelmoument Y, Coiffic A, Colona G, et al. Association of robotic totally endoscopyc coronary artery bypass graft surgery associated with a preliminary cardiac enhanced recovery after suregry. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2015;29(6):1489-97.

  17. Tian GJ, Li DY, Dong YD, Peng YN, Liu P, Wei YK, et al. Clinical efficacy of enhanced recovery after surgery in atrial caval shunting for type A Budd-Chiari syndrome. Chin J Surg. 2017;55(9):671-7.

  18. Varelmann D. Shook D. Buric F. Yadzchi SI. Dinga Madou I. Morth K et al. Enhanced recovery after cardiac surgery: fluid balance and incidence of acute kidney injury. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2019[acceso: 14/012/2019];33:140-68. Disponible en: Disponible en: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S1053077019306548

  19. Anastasiadis K, Asterious C, Antonitsis P, Agiriadou H, Konstantinou D, Tossios P. Enhanced recovery after elective coronary revascularization surgery with minimal versus conventional extracorporeal circulation: a prospective randomized study. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2013;27(5):859-64.

  20. Hardman G, Bose A, Saunders A, Walker AH. Enhanced recovery in cardiac surgery. J Cardiothorac Surg. 2015[acceso: 11/01/2018];10(Suppl 1):A75. Disponible en: Disponible en: http://www.cardithoracicsurgery.org/content/10/S1/A75

  21. Zammert M, Buric D, Yazdchi F, Dinga Madou I, Manca C, Woo S, et al. The influence of enhanced recovery after cardiac surgery on 30-day readmission rate, hospital and ICU length of stay. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2019;33:S85-104.

  22. Morasch A. 1 st ERACS Best Practices Symposium. The formation of Enhanced Recovery After Cardiac Surgery Society. Enhanced Recovery After Cardiac Surgery Society. 2017[acceso: 14/01/2018]. Disponible en: Disponible en: http://www.eracs.org

  23. Williams P. ERAS Cardiac Surgery Named Official Heart Surgery Representative for ERAS Society. Enhanced Recovery After Cardiac Surgery Society. 2018[acceso: 09/09/2018]. Disponible en: Disponible en: https://www.businesswire.com/news/home/20180412005503/en/ERAS-Cardiac-Surgery-Named-Official-Heart-Surgery

  24. Williams P. ERAS Cardiac Surgery Officially Joins ERAS Society at World Congress in Stockholm. Enhanced Recovery After Cardiac Surgery Society. 2018 [acceso: 09/09/2018]. Disponible en: Disponible en: https://www.businesswire.com/news/home/20180619006294/en/ERAS-Cardiac-Surgery-Officially-Joins-ERAS-Society

  25. Williams P. ERAS Cardiac Surgery Releases Consensus Statement of Best Practices to Speed Recovery after Heart Surgery. Enhanced Recovery After Cardiac Surgery Society. 2018[acceso: 09/06/2018]. Disponible en: Disponible en: https://www.businesswire.com/news/home/20180430006119/en/ERAS-Cardiac-Surgery-Releases-Consensus-Statement-Practices

  26. Daniel T. Engelman, Walid Ben A, Judson B. Williams, Louis P. Perraul, V. Seenu Reddy, Rakesh C. Arora, et al. Guidelines for Perioperative Care in Cardiac Surgery Enhanced Recover y After Surgery Society Recommendations. JAMA Surgery. 2019;E1-12. https://doi.org/10.1001%2Fjamasurg.2019.1153

  27. Agüero MO, Jiménez RP. Técnicas anestésicas neuroaxiales asociadas con anestesia general en procedimientos quirúrgicos cardiacos. Revisión sistemática y metanálisis. Rev Cub Cardiol Cir Cardiovasc. 2013[acceso: 31/01/2018];19(2):79-86. Disponible en: Disponible en: http://bvs.sld.cu/revistas/scar/indice.htm

  28. Agüero MO. Anestesia multimodal en Cirugía cardiovascular. En: Protocolización de la asistencia médica en el Hospital Hermanos Ameijieras: resultados en los primeros 5 años de aplicación. 1ed. Cuba: Ciencias Médicas; 2012. p. 103-9.

  29. Guay J, Kopp S. Epidural analgesia for adults undergoing cardiac surgery with or without cardiopulmonary bypass (Review). Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews; 2019. https://10.1002/14651858.CD006715.pub3

  30. Anglada Ll, Abadal E. ¿Qué es la ciencia abierta? Anuario ThinkEPI. 2018;12:292-8. https://doi.org/10.3145/thinkepi.2018.43

  31. Agüero MO. Ciencia abierta: presente y futuro de la Anestesiología en Cuba. Rev Cub Anest Rean. 2019[acceso: 03/05/2019;19(1). Disponible en: Disponible en: http://www.revanestesia.sld.cu/index.php/anestRean/article/view/607/863>

  32. Dinu NR, Baiget T. Presente y futuro de las revistas científicas. Scire. 2019;25(1):37-46.

  33. Cruz-Cruz EM. Tendencias actuales en las revistas científicas, el camino a seguir. Revista Electrónica Dr Zoilo E Marinello Vidaurreta. 2019[acceso: 08/05/2018];44(1). Disponible en: Disponible en: http://revzoilomarinello.sld.cu/index.php/zmv/article/view/1631

  34. Bezjak S, Clyburne-Sherin A, Conzett P, Fernandes P, Görögh E, Helbig K, et al. Ciencia abierta. Manual para capacitación. Editorial. Zenodo. 2018[acceso: 07/07/2019]. Disponible en: Disponible en: https://zenodo.org/record/1212496

  35. Williams P. Leading Cardiac Surgeons Endorse Novel Enhanced Recovery Pathways, Outline Best Practices to Improve Outcomes and Lower Costs. Enhanced Recovery After Cardiac Surgery Society. 2018[acceso: 07/09/2018]. Disponible en: Disponible en: https://www.businesswire.com/news/home/20170501006051/en/Leading-Cardiac-Surgeons-Endorse-Enhanced-Recovery-Pathways

  36. Li M, Zhang J, Gan T, Qin G, Wang L, Zhu M, et al. Enhanced recovery after surgery pathway for patients undergoing cardiac surgery: A randomized clinical trial. European journal of cardio-thoracic surgery?: official journal of the European Association for Cardio-thoracic Surgery. 2018;54:491-97.

  37. Alonso JC, Molina FJ, Chuquiure EJ, Ochoa VP, Soto GN, Baranda FM, et al. Valoración preoperatoria en cirugía cardiovascular. Arch Cardiol Mex. 2011;81(Supl 2):9-15.

  38. Menosi GD, Ching YP, Caramelli B, Coelho MA, Calderaro D. 3rd Guideline for Perioperative Cardiovascular Evaluation of the Brazilian Society of Cardiology. Arq Bras Cardiol. 2017;109(3 Suppl 1):1-104. https://doi.org/10.5935%2Fabc.20170140

  39. Dempsey DT. Stomach. En: Schwartz's Principles of Surgery [CD-ROM]. 8th ed. The McGraw-Hill Companies; 2007.

  40. Cabrera PA, Cruz BR, Suárez LJ, Hernández OR. Anestesiología y reanimación cardiovascular. En: VI Edición del manual de Prácticas médicas Hospital Hermanos Ameijeiras. VI. Ediciones digitales. CEDISAP; 2018.

  41. Padrón S. Postoperatorio de cirugía cardiovascular. En: Manual de prácticas médicas HCQ Hermanos Ameijeiras. 2ed. Cuba: Ciencias Médicas; 2008[acceso: 13/04/2018]. Disponible en: Disponible en: http://www.hospitalalmeijeiras.sld.cu/hha/mpm/documentos/cirugía%20

  42. Grupo de trabajo. Vía clínica de recuperación intensificada en cirugía abdominal (RICA). Vía clínica de recuperación intensificada en cirugía abdominal (RICA) [Internet]. Ministerio de seguridad, Servicios Sociales e Igualdad. España; 2015[acceso: 23/02/2019]. Disponible en: Disponible en: http://portal.guiasalud.es/contenidos/iframes/documentos/opbe/2015-07/VíA-Clínica-Rica.pdf

  43. Vickers AJ. Why Mr Jones got surgery even if he didn't: Intention-to-treat analysis. 2009[acceso: 08/03/2018]. Disponible en: Disponible en: http://www.eset.com

  44. Asociación Médica Mundial. Declaración de Helsinky de la AMM -Principios éticos para las investigaciones médicas en seres humanos. Universidad de Navarra. Centro de documentación de Bioética. 2013[acceso: 27/02/2019]. Disponible en: Disponible en: http://www.unav.es/cdb




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com