2021, Number 1
Results and clinical-anesthetic repercussion of preoperative complementary tests in Asa-I patients scheduled for ambulatory surgery
Language: Spanish
References: 13
Page: 1-7
PDF size: 373.50 Kb.
ABSTRACT
Introduction: The selection of preoperative laboratory tests (specific tests or imaging tests) should be done, as a complementary measure, in the case of clinical suspicion. Indiscriminate and routine request is unnecessary and implies additional costs for the institution, in addition to the possibility of false positive results, with more or less serious repercussions for patients.Objective: To highlight the results and the clinical-anesthetic repercussion of complementary preoperative examinations in ASA-I patients who arrive for ambulatory surgery at Commandant Pinares General Teaching Hospital in San Cristóbal Municipality, Artemisa Province, during the year 2017.
Method: An observational, descriptive, cross-sectional study was carried out at Commandant Pinares General Teaching Hospital in San Cristóbal Municipality, Artemisa Province, during the year 2017. The universe was represented by 823 patients who underwent ambulatory surgery. The sample consisted of 394 patients, following nonprobabilistic, intentional selection criteria.
Results: The sex with the highest prevalence of surgeries was the female sex (65.98%). The most frequent ages were between 18 and 30 years. The most performed elective surgery was cholecystectomy (43.18%). Regarding the paraclinical examinations performed, a low incidence of alterations was detected; the perioperative complication detected was hypertensive crisis (0.50%).
Conclusion: The results of the complementary examinations were normal in most of the patients, without repercussions or changes in the clinical anesthetic behavior. In addition, they generated high expenses for the health institution.
Keywords: complementary tests; ASA-I patients; ambulatory surgery; clinical practice guides
REFERENCES
Recart A. Cirugía mayor ambulatoria una nueva forma de entender la medicina quirúrgica. Rev Méd Clín Las Condes. 2017[acceso: 12/02/2020];28(5):649-812. Disponible en: Disponible en: https://www.elsevier.es/es-revista-revista-medica-clinica-las-condes-202-articulo-cirugia-mayor-ambulatoria-una-nueva-S0716864017301256
Apfelbaum JL, Connis RT, Nickinovich DG, Pasternak LR, Arens JF, Caplan RA, et al. Practice advisory for preanesthesia evaluation: an updated report by the American Society of Anesthesiologists Task Force on Preanesthesia Evaluation. Anesthesiology. 2012[acceso: 12/02/2020];116(3):522-38. Disponible en: Disponible en: https://anesthesiology.pubs.asahq.org/article.aspx?articleid=2443414
De Hert S, Imberger G, Carlisle J, Diemunsch P, Fritsch G, Moppett I, et al. Preoperative evaluation of the adult patient undergoing non-cardiac surgery: guidelines from the European Society of Anaesthesiology. Eur J Anaesthesiol EJA. 2011[acceso: 12/02/2020];28(10):684-722. Disponible en: Disponible en: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/2188598/
Cuadrado Cenzual MA, Ortega Madueño I. Utilidad de las pruebas diagnósticas en la práctica clínica: medicina de laboratorio basada en la evidencia. Asociación Española de Biopatología Médica. 2012[acceso: 15/10/2014]. Disponible en: Disponible en: https://docplayer.es/5700631-Utilidad-de-las-pruebas-diagnosticas-en-la-practica-clinica-medicina-de-laboratorio-basada-en-la-evidencia.html