2022, Number 1
<< Back
Rev CONAMED 2022; 27 (1)
Certificate-opinion of injuries. Case study
García GI
Language: Spanish
References: 17
Page: 41-52
PDF size: 141.97 Kb.
ABSTRACT
Introduction: The clinical doctor must know how injuries should be described and the forensic doctor, attached to the Public Ministry Agency, must also know how to structure the certificate-opinion of injuries, applying his knowledge through the scientific method in the examination of people (complainants and accused) according to the way it is done in forensic medicine and medical-clinical procedures (based on propaedeutics and semiology). Its use will allow you to identify, describe, interpret, diagnose and issue your conclusions about the perceived injuries and in the structuring of the certificate-opinion. Such capabilities are essential in the work of any forensic doctor; however, there are cases in which the certificates-opinions are incomplete and inadequate, so it is essential to review these procedures. The certificates-opinions constitute decisive evidence during criminal proceeding for the investigation of crimes by injuries; that is why the poor preparation of such certificates-opinions can lead to inaccuracies during the investigation, as well as to the discredit of the medical-forensic expert, as well as seriously harm the legal interpretation of the injuries and, therefore, those involved.
Conclusion: One of the controversies caused by the medical-forensic evidence on the injuries that the people involved in a trial, is their inappropriate, inaccurate description or that the diagnosis is based on symptoms without clinical livelihood, or supported by laboratory studies and cabinet, causing that the conclusions of experts and investigative authorities, are wrong at the time of issuing their opinions or resolutions, respectively, affecting the imparting of justice.
REFERENCES
Diccionario Espasa de medicina. Facultad de Medicina. Universidad de Navarra. Espasa Calpe. 2001.
Ahangar P, Mills SJ, Smith LE, Gronthos S, Cowin AJ. Human gingival fibroblast secretome accelerates wound healing through anti-inflammatory and pro-angiogenic mechanisms. Regen Med. 2020; 5: 24. Available in: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41536-020-00109-9
Velnar T, Bailey T, Smrkolj V. The wound healing process: an overview of the cellular and molecular mechanisms. J Int Med Res. 2009; 37 (5): 1528-15242.
García GI. Procedimiento pericial médico-forense. 5ª ed. Editorial Porrúa. México, 2017, XIII, 235, 237, 349.
Payne-James J, Crane J, Hinchliffe JA. Injury assessment, documentation, and interpretation. Clinical Forensic Medicine: A Physician's Guide, 2nd Edition. Edited by: M. M. Stark © Humana Press Inc., Totowa, NJ. 2005.
Robertson I, Hodge PR. Histopathology of healing abrasion. Forensic Science. 1972; 1: 17-25.
DiMaio VJ, DiMaio D. Forensic Pathology. 2nd ed. CRC Press. Boca Raton, Florida. 2001, 94.
Vanezis P. Interpreting bruises at necropsy. J Clin Pathol. 2001; 54: 348-355.
Rodolfo Daniel Cervantes-Villagrana. Mecanismos de señalización involucrados en la resolución de la inflamación. Gaceta Médica de México. 2014; 150: 440-449.
Kostadinova-Petrova I, Mitevska E, Janeska B. Histological characteristics of bruises with different age. Open Access Maced J Med Sci. 2017; 5 (7): 813-817.
Herrera LM, da Costa SM, da Silva FCM. Violence against children and adolescents: the importance of knowledge of the spectrum of bruise colors in its diagnosis. RSBO. 2013; 10 (4): 378-385.
Duangta Dulabutr. The correlation between the color changes of contusions and the time period after injuries in thai populations. Thammasat Medical Journal. 2018; 18 (4): 561-569.
Tirado J, Mauricio D. Bruise dating using deep learning. J Forensic Sci. 2021; 66: 336-346.
Gascho D, Heimer J, Thali MJ, Flach PM. The value of MRI for assessing danger to life in nonfatal strangulation. Forensic Imaging. 2020; 22: 200398.
Abedr-Rahman H, Salameh HO, Salameh RJ, Alabdallat LI, Al-Abdallat IM. Role of forensic medicine in evaluating non-fatal physical violence against women by their husbands in Jordan. J Forensic Leg Med. 2017; 49: 33-36.
Mézquita OJF. El arte del diagnóstico. Med Int Mex. 2006; 22: 246-552.
García GI. Mala práctica pericial. Estudio de un caso. Revista Tepantlato, Núm. 97, 9a época, 2019, 8-24.