2021, Number 5
<< Back Next >>
Acta Ortop Mex 2021; 35 (5)
Thoracolumbar trauma: in situ fixation vs decompression and fixation in neurologically involved burst fractures
Cristiani-Winer M, Nicolás-Ortiz P, Orosco-Falcone D
Language: Spanish
References: 11
Page: 453-456
PDF size: 159.84 Kb.
ABSTRACT
Thoracolumbar burst fractures are a great challenge for spine surgeons and that is why the aim of this study was to perform a systematic review analyzing the current literature regarding the different factors to take into account in their management.
Material and methods: Systematic search in PubMed, Cochrane, MedlinePlus sites. "Thoracolumbar Burst Fractures" were the keywords. Titles, abstracts and full text were analyzed from two independent observers.
Results: Six studies were included, five (83.33%) were prospective cohort studies and only one (16.67%) was retrospective. There were a total of 289 patients among all samples. The mean age was 38.48 years and the sex ratio was male to female of 1.7:1.
Conclusion: Thoracolumbar burst fractures remain controversial in their treatment with published literature of low level of evidence and without establishing a consensus at the time of decision making with different options depending on the surgeon's experience and preference. However, most of them are inclined towards treatment with short segment posterior fixation but without long-term follow-up. Regarding neurological deficit, surgical decompression achieved consensus among all surgeons.
REFERENCES
Zhang L, Zou J, Gan M, Shi J, Li J, Yang H. Treatment of thoracolumbar burst fractures: short-segment pedicle instrumentation versus kyphoplasty. Acta Orthop Belg. 2013; 79(6): 718-25.
Wu H, Zhao DX, Jiang R, Zhou XY. Surgical treatment of Denis type B thoracolumbar burst fracture with neurological deficiency by paraspinal approach. Braz J Med Biol Res. 2016; 49(11): e5599.
Chen C, Lv G, Xu B, Zhang X, Ma X. Posterior short-segment instrumentation and limited segmental decompression supplemented with vertebroplasty with calcium sulphate and intermediate screws for thoracolumbar burst fractures. Eur Spine J. 2014; 23(7): 1548-57.
Schouten R, Lewkonia P, Noonan VK, Dvorak MF, Fisher CG. Expectations of recovery and functional outcomes following thoracolumbar trauma: an evidence-based medicine process to determine what surgeons should be telling their patients. J Neurosurg Spine. 2015; 22(1): 101-11.
Ko SB, Lee SW. Result of posterior instrumentation without fusion in the management of thoracolumbar and lumbar unstable burst fracture. J Spinal Disord Tech. 2014; 27(4): 189-95.
Zhang Z, Chen G, Sun J, Wang G, Yang H, Luo Z, et al. Posterior indirect reduction and pedicle screw fixation without laminectomy for Denis type B thoracolumbar burst fractures with incomplete neurologic deficit. J Orthop Surg Res. 2015; 10: 85.
Deng Z, Zou H, Cai L, Ping A, Wang Y, Ai Q. The retrospective analysis of posterior short-segment pedicle instrumentation without fusion for thoracolumbar burst fracture with neurological deficit. ScientificWorldJournal. 2014; 2014: 457634.
Toyone T, Ozawa T, Inada K, Shirahata T, Shiboi R, Watanabe A, et al. Short-segment fixation without fusion for thoracolumbar burst fractures with neurological deficit can preserve thoracolumbar motion without resulting in post-traumatic disc degeneration: a 10-year follow-up study. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2013; 38(17): 1482-90.
Hitchon PW, Abode-Iyamah K, Dahdaleh NS, Shaffrey C, Noeller J, He W, et al. Nonoperative management in neurologically intact thoracolumbar burst fractures: clinical and radiographic outcomes. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2016; 41(6): 483-9.
Machino M, Yukawa Y, Ito K, Kanbara S, Morita D, Kato F. Posterior ligamentous complex injuries are related to fracture severity and neurological damage in patients with acute thoracic and lumbar burst fractures. Yonsei Med J. 2013; 54(4): 1020-5.
Xiao J, Wang X, Tan X. Treatment for thoracolumbar spinal burst fracture in youth and middle-aged adults by bone cement filling. Zhong Nan Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban. 2016; 41(8): 832-7.
EVIDENCE LEVEL
III