Roque-Márquez JG, Zavala-Alonso NV, Patiño-Marín N, Martínez-Castañón GA

Language: English
References: 28
Page: 107-119
PDF size: 476.21 Kb.

ABSTRACT

Evaluate the effect on the shear bond strength (SBS) of 5% NaOCl applied after acid etching on ground anterior teeth with fluorosis and analyze the surface with scanning electron microscopy (SEM), also compare fluorotic and healthy ground enamel by atomic force microscopy (AFM) and Vickers microhardness (VM). For the SBS test 30 anterior teeth with moderate and severe fluorosis according Dean index were selected by an examiner previously calibrated with an expert in fluorosis by using the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). With the help of a calibrated high speed diamond bur for veneer preparation and a parallel chamfer high speed diamond bur the vestibular face was prepared with a uniform reduction of .3 mm under water cooling. In one half of the vestibular face of the teeth the conventional adhesive procedure was carried out while in the other half was added an additional step with 5% NaOCl applied for 1 minute and washing after acid etchant. A resin post was adhered in each half and load was applied until fracture. The failure mode was evaluated and a SEM analysis was made. Posteriorly 10 samples of fluorotic and healthy ground enamel were used to measure the nanostructural characteristics by AFM (roughness average and absolute depth profile) and the VM in three operative steps (after ground, after etchant and after deproteinization). The Shapiro-Wilks and Brown-Forsythe methods were used to test the distribution of variables. The Paired Student's t-test was used to compare the differences between mean bond strength (MPa) in the two groups for SBS test. Chi-square analyzes were performed to compare the failure modes between groups. One-way ANOVA analysis and Tukey-Kramer post hoc test were used to compare groups for roughness average, absolute depth profile and Vickers microhardness. A greater SBS (32.17±4.20 MPa) and a surface more homogeneous and less contaminated were observed in the deproteinization subgruoup compared to the conventional subgroup (27.74±4.88 MPa). AFM parameters were greater in fluorosis subgroup than in healthy enamel subgroup. VM was lower in the fluorotic enamel in each operative step in comparation with healthy enamel. The use of 5% NaOCl as a deproteinizing agent after acid etchant in ground fluorotic enamel results in better adhesion, which may imply greater success in adhesive treatments. The ground surface of fluorotic enamel shows higher values of roughness and depth and lower values of VM which proves that there is a more irregular and less hard surface.

REFERENCES

1. Alvarez J.A., Rezende K.M., Marocho S.M., Alves F.B., Celiberti P., Ciamponi A.L. Dental fluorosis: Exposure, prevention and management. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal 2009 Feb; 14.(2): 103-7.

2. Akpata E.S. Ocurrence and management of dental fluorosis. Int Dent J. 2001 Oct; 51 (5): 325-333.

3. Churchill H.V. Ocurrence of fluoride in some waters of United States. Ind Engl. Chem. 1931 Sept; 23 (9): 966-68.

4. Al-Sugar M.H., Akpata E.S. Effect of fluorosis on etching of human enamel. J Oral Rehabil. 1999 Jun; 26 (6): 521-28.

5. Den Besten P.K. Dental fluorosis: its use as a biomarker. Adv Dent Res. 1994 Jun; 8 (1): 105-10.

6. Den Besten P.K., Thariani H. Biological mechanisms of fluorosis and level and timing of systemic exposure to fluoride with respect to fluorosis. J Dent Res. 1992 May; 71 (5): 1238-43.

7. Thylstrup A. Distribution of dental fluorosis in the primary dentition. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol. 1978 Oct; 6 (6), 329-37.

8. Peumans M., De Munck J., Fieuws S., Lambrechts P., Vanherle G., Van Meerbeek B. A prospective ten-year clinical trial of porcelain veneers. J Adhes Dent. 2004 Spring; 6 (1): 65-76.

9. Peumans M., Van Meerbeek B., Lammbrechts P., Vanherle G. Porcelain veneers: a review of the literature. J Dent. 2000 Mar; 28 (3): 163-77.

10. Bassir M.M., Rezvani M.B., Ghomsheh E.T., Hosseini Z.M. Effect of different surface treatments on microtensile bond strength of composite resin to normal and fluorotic enamel after microabrasion. J Dent (Tehran). 2016 Nov;13 (6): 431-37.

11. Ermis R.B., De Munck J., Cardoso M.V., Coutinho E., Van Landuyt K.L., Poitevin A., et al. Bonding to ground versus unground enamel in fluorosed teeth. Dent Mater. 2007 Oct; 23 (10): 1250-55.

12. Richards A., Fejerskov O., Baelum V. Enamel fluoride in relation to severity of human dental fluorosis. Adv Den Res. 1989 Sept; 3 (2): 147-53.

13. Aoba T., Fejerskov O. Dental fluorosis: chemistry and biology. Crit Rev Oral Biol Med. 2002 Mar; 13 (2): 155-70.

14. Ramakrishna Y., Bhoomika, A., Harleen N., Munshi A.K. Enamel deproteinization after acid etching– is it worth the effort?. Dentistry. 2014 Jan; 4 (2): 200.

15. Venezie R.D., Vadiakas G., Christensen J.R., Wright J.T. Enamel pretreatment with sodium hypochlorite to enhance bonding in hypocalcified amelogenesis imperfecta: case report and SEM analysis. Pediatr Dent. 1994 Nov;16 (6): 433-36.

16. Sönmez I.S., Aras S., Tunc E., Kücükesmen C. Clinical success of deproteinization in hypocalcified amelogenesis imperfecta. Quintessence Int. 2009 Feb; 40 (2): 113-18.

17. Saroglu I., Aras S., Öztas D. Effect of deproteinization on composite bond strength in hypocalcified amelogenesis imperfecta. Oral Dis. 2006 May; 12 (3): 305-8.

18. Aras S., Kücükesmen C., Kücükesmen H.C., Sönmez I.S. Deproteinization treatment on bond strengths of primary, mature and immature permanent tooth enamel. J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2013 Spring; 37 (3): 275-80.

19. Dean H.T., Dixon R., Cohen C. Mottled enamel in Texas. Pub Health Rep. 1935 Mar; 50 (13): 424-42.

20. Dean H.T. Classification of mottled enamel diagnosis. J Am Dent Assoc. 1934 Aug; 21 (8): 1421-26.

21. Armstrong S.R., Keller J.C., Boyer D.B. The influence of water storage and C factor on the dentin-resin composite microtensile bond strength and debond pathway utilizing a filled and unfilled adhesive resin. Dent Mater. 2001 May;17 (3): 268-76.

22. Armstrong S.R., Vargas M.A., Fang Q., Laffoon J.E. Microtensile bond strength of a total-etch 3-step, total-etch 2-step, self-etch 2-step, and a self-etch 1step dentin bonding system through 15-month water storage. J Adhes Dent. 2003 Spring; 5 (1): 47-56.

23. Silverstone L.M, Saxton C.A., Dogon I.L., Fejerskov O. Variation in the Pattern of Acid Etching of Human Dental Enamel Examined by Scanning Electron Microscopy. Caries Res. 1975; 9 (5): 373-87.

24. Legler L.R., Retief D.H., Bradley E.L., Denys F.R., Sadowsky P.L. Effects of phosphoric acid concentration and etch duration on the shear bond strength of an orthodontic bonding resin to enamel: An in vitro study. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1989 Dec; 96 (6): 485-92.

25. Meredith L., Farella M., Lowrey S., Cannon R.D., Mei, L. Atomic force microscopy analysis of enamel nanotopography after interproximal reduction. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2017 Apr; 151 (4): 750-57.

26. Zavala-Alonso V., Martínez-Castanon G.A., Patiño-Marín N., Terrones H., Anusavice K., Loyola-Rodríguez J.P. Characterization of Healthy and Fluorotic Enamel by Atomic Force Microscopy. Microsc Microanal. 2010 Oct; 16 (05): 531-36.

27. Torres-Gallegos I., Zavala-Alonso V., Patiño-Marín N., Martinez-Castañon G., Anusavice K., Loyola-Rodríguez J. Enamel roughness and depth profile after phosphoric acid etching of healthy and fluorotic enamel. Aust Dent J. 2012 Jun; 57 (2): 151-56.

28. Monjaras-Avila A., Zavala-Alonso V., Morales-Alcocer G., Martinez-Castañon G.A., Patiño-Marin N., Ramirez-Gonzalez J. Analysis of the surface of healthy and fluorotic human enamel using microhardness test. Superficies y Vacío. 2017 Mar; 30 (1): 6-9.