medigraphic.com
ISSN 2078-7170 (Electronic)

2021, Number 1

<< Back Next >>

CorSalud 2021; 13 (1)

Global circumferential strain in patients with ischemic heart disease

Román-Fernández I, Pérez-Barreda A, Naranjo-Domínguez A, Rodríguez-Navarro AY, Alfonso-Montero OA

Language: Spanish
References: 34
Page: 9-18
PDF size: 878.99 Kb.


ABSTRACT

Introduction: Cardiovascular diseases are the top cause of death in Cuba as well as in most developed countries. Two-dimensional speckle-tracking (2D-ST) echocardiography is a recent technique in the evaluation of cardiac function.
Objective: To determine the relationship between global circumferential strain (GCS) measured through 2D-ST echocardiography and the state of coronary circulation in patients with ischemic heart disease.
Method: An analytical, cross-sectional study was carried out on 55 patients with indication of coronary angiography, who underwent echocardiography to measure the GCS through 2D-ST at the Centro de Investigaciones Medico Quirúrgicas (CIMEQ, Havana, Cuba), during one year. Two groups were created: with significant coronary artery disease (SCAD = 32) and non-significant coronary artery disease (NSCAD = 23). The statistical package for the social sciences (SPSS) was used to analyze the results.
Results: Mean age was higher in the SCAD group (55.6 ± 9.3 vs. 61.8± 8.8, p=0.014). Men with SCAD (47.3%), patients with high blood pressure (SCAD = 90.6% and NSCAD = 65.2%, p = 0.02) and smokers (SCAD = 59.4% and NSCAD = 17.4%, p = 0.002) predominated. The most frequent diagnosis was chronic stable angina (87%). Three-vessel disease predominated in the SCAD group (75%). The GCS was lower in the SCAD group [(-19.5.0 ± 3.8 vs. -25.2 ± 5.7, p = 0.033); area under the curve = 0.208]. There were no differences in GCS according to the number of significantly diseased vessels.
Conclusions: The results found do not justify the use of GCS through 2D-ST echocardiography to discriminate the presence or nor of SCAD.


REFERENCES

  1. Benjamin EJ, Blaha MJ, Chiuve SE, Cushman M, Das SR, Deo R, et al. Heart Disease and Stroke Statistics-2017 Update: A Report From the American Heart Association. Circulation. 2017;135(10):e146-e603. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1161/CIR.0000000000000485

  2. Ministerio de Salud Pública. Anuario Estadístico de Salud 2016. La Habana: Dirección de Registros Médicos y Estadísticas de Salud; 2017.

  3. Trainini JC, Elencwajg B, López Cabanillas N, Herrero J, Lago N, Lowenstein JA, et al. Fundamentos de la Nueva Mecánica Cardiaca. La bomba de succión. 1ª ed. Buenos Aires: Lumen; 2015.

  4. Montalescot G, Sechtem U, Achenbach S, Andreotti F, Arden C, Budaj A, et al. Guía de Práctica Clínica de la ESC 2013 sobre diagnóstico y tratamiento de la cardiopatía isquémica estable. Rev Esp Cardiol. 2014;67(2):135.e1-81. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.recesp.2013.11.007

  5. Marwick TH. Ejection Fraction Pros and Cons: JACC State-of-the-Art Review. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2018;72(19):2360-79. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2018.08.2162

  6. Cossio PR. Fundamentos de la Nueva Mecánica Cardiaca. La bomba de succión. Rev Argent Cardiol. 2016;84(1):73.

  7. Poveda F, Gil D, Martí E, Andaluz A, Ballester M, Carreras F. Estudio tractográfico de la anatomía helicoidal del miocardio ventricular mediante resonancia magnética por tensor de difusión. Rev Esp Cardiol. 2013;66(10):782-90. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.recesp.2013.04.022

  8. Kocabay G, Muraru D, Peluso D, Cucchini U, Sorina M, Padayattil-Jose S, et al. Mecánica ventricular izquierda normal mediante ecocardiografía speckle tracking bidimensional. Valores de referencia para adultos sanos. Rev Esp Cardiol. 2014;67(8):651-8. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.recesp.2013.12.011

  9. Mada RO, Duchenne J, Voigt JV. Tissue Doppler, Strain and Strain Rate in ischem ic heart disease "How I do it". Cardiovasc Ultrasound [Internet]. 2014 [citado 18/12/2019];12(38). Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.1186/1476-7120-12-38

  10. Voigt JU, Pedrizzetti G, Lysyansky P, Marwick TH, Houle H, Baumann R, et al. Definitions for a common standard for 2D speckle tracking echocardiography: consensus document of the EACVI/ASE/Industry Task Force to standardize deformation imaging. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2015;16(1):1-11. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/ehjci/jeu184

  11. Takeuchi M, Nishikage T, Nakai H, Kokumai M, Otani S, Lang RM. The assessment of left ventricular twist in anterior wall myocardial infarction using two-dimensional speckle tracking imaging. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2007;20(1):36-44. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.echo.2006.06.019

  12. Norum IB, Ruddox V, Edvardsen T, Otterstad JE. Diagnostic accuracy of left ventricular longitudinal function by speckle tracking echocardiography to predict significant coronary artery stenosis. A systematic review. BMC Med Imaging [Internet]. 2015 [citado 26/12/2019];15:25. Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12880-015-0067-y

  13. Damman P, van Geloven N, Wallentin L, Lagerqvist B, Fox KA, Clayton T, et al. Timing of angiography with a routine invasive strategy and long-term outcomes in non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndrome: a collaborative analysis of individual patient data from the FRISC II (Fragmin and Fast Revascularization During Instability in Coronary Artery Disease), ICTUS (Invasive Versus Conservative Treatment in Unstable Coronary Syndromes), and RITA-3 (Intervention Versus Conservative Treatment Strategy in Patients With Unstable Angina or Non-ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction) Trials. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2012;5(2):191-9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcin.2011.10.016

  14. Hamm CW, Bassand JP, Agewall S, Bax J, Boersma E, Bueno H, et al. ESC Guidelines for the management of acute coronary syndromes in patients presenting without persistent ST-segment elevation: The Task Force for the management of acute coronary syndromes (ACS) in patients presenting without persistent ST-segment elevation of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC). Eur Heart J. 2011;32(23):2999-3054. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehr236

  15. Gastaldello A, Merlo P, Amor M, Alasia D, Galello M, Rousse M, et al. El strain longitudinal en reposo no predice el resultado del eco estrés. Rev Argent Cardiol. 2016;84(4):343-8.

  16. Caniggia C, Amor M, Lowenstein Haber D, Alasia D, Galello M, Darú V, et al. Factibilidad y aportes del análisis de la deformación longitudinal 2D global y regional durante el eco estrés con ejercicio. Rev Argent Cardiol. 2014;82(2):110-7.

  17. Lang RM, Badano LP, Mor-Avi V, Afilalo J, Armstrong A, Ernande L, et al. Recommendations for cardiac chamber quantification by echocardiography in adults: an update from the American Society of Echocardiography and the European Association of Cardiovascular Imaging. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2015;28(1):1-39.e14. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.echo.2014.10.003

  18. Redberg RF, Benjamin EJ, Bittner V, Braun LT, Goff DC Jr, Havas S, et al. ACCF/AHA 2009 performance measures for primary prevention of cardiovascular disease in adults: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association Task Force on Performance Measures (Writing Committee to Develop Performance Measures for Primary Prevention of Cardiovascular Disease) developed in collaboration with the American Academy of Family Physicians; American Association of Cardiovascular and Pulmonary Rehabilitation; and Preventive Cardiovascular Nurses Association: endorsed by the American College of Preventive Medicine, American College of Sports Medicine, and Society for Women's Health Research. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2009;54(14):1364-405. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2009.08.005

  19. Armas Rojas NA, Dueñas Herrera A, de la Noval García R, Ortega Torres Y, Acosta González M, Morales Salinas A. Cardiopatía Isquémica en Cuba. Una puesta al día. Rev Cuban Cardiol [Internet]. 2015 [citado 29/12/2019];21(3). Disponible en: http://www.revcardiologia.sld.cu/index.php/revcardiologia/article/view/597/pdf_15

  20. Villar Inclán A, Ocaña VH, Pedroso Rodríguez J, Cruz Bouza R, Cosimo Guida M, Peña Hernández E, et al. Primeros resultados comparativos de dos vías de abordajes de cirugía de revascularización coronaria mínimamente invasiva. Rev Cuba Cir. 2010;49(4):15-28.

  21. Santos Pérez A, Pérez López H, Valero Hernández A, Lage López L, Borges Moreno YR. Factores preoperatorios relacionados con las complicaciones cardiovasculares de la cirugía de revascularización coronaria. Gac Méd Espirit [Internet]. 2010 [citado 30/12/2019];12(3). Disponible en: http://www.revgmespirituana.sld.cu/index.php/gme/article/view/1549/1700

  22. Echemendía Simón ED, Villar Inclán A, Nafeh Abi-Rezk M, Pedroso Rodríguez J, Martí Peréz D, Hidalgo Costa T. Comparación de los resultados de la revascularización miocárdica con corazón latiente, con circulación extracorpórea y sin ella. Rev Cuba Cir. 2011;50(1):25-39.

  23. Organización Mundial de la Salud. Enfermedades cardiovasculares: Datos y cifras [Internet]. Ginebra: Organización Mundial de la Salud; 2017 [citado 16/01/2020]. Disponible en: https://www.who.int/es/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/cardiovascular-diseases-(cvds)

  24. Paula Piñera BM, Díaz Valdez YN, Hernández Puentes Y, Salinas Olivares M, Almeida Carralero G, Gutiérrez Alba NE, et al. Impacto de la Hipertensión Arterial en el proceso aterosclerótico de las arterias coronarias: Patomorfometría. Rev Cuban Invest Bioméd. 2009;28(3):37-43.

  25. Bonet Gorbea M, Varona Pérez P, Chang La Rosa M, García Rocha RG, Suárez Medina R, Arcia Montes de Oca N, et al. III Encuesta Nacional de factores de riesgo y actividades preventivas de enfermedades no transmisibles. Cuba 2010-2011. La Habana: ECIMED, 2014.

  26. Mahmood SS, Levy D, Vasan RS, Wang TJ. The Framingham Heart Study and the epidemiology of cardiovascular disease: a historical perspective. Lancet. 2014;383(9921):999-1008. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/s0140-6736(13)61752-3

  27. O'Donnell CJ, Elosua R. Factores de riesgo cardiovascular. Perspectivas derivadas del Framingham Heart Study. Rev Esp Cardiol. 2008;61(3):299-310. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1157/13116658

  28. Montgomery DE, Puthumana JJ, Fox JM, Ogunyankin KO. Global longitudinal strain aids the detection of non-obstructive coronary artery disease in the resting echocardiogram. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2012;13(7):579-87. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/ejechocard/jer282

  29. Smedsrud MK, Sarvari S, Haugaa KH, Gjesdal O, Ørn S, Aaberge L, et al. Duration of myocardial early systolic lengthening predicts the presence of significant coronary artery disease. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2012;60(12):1086-93. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2012.06.022

  30. Amundsen BH, Helle-Valle T, Edvardsen T, Torp H, Crosby J, Lyseggen E, et al. Noninvasive myocardial strain measurement by speckle tracking echocardiography: validation against sonomicrometry and tagged magnetic resonance imaging. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2006;47(4):789-93. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2005.10.040

  31. Shimoni S, Gendelman G, Ayzenberg O, Smirin N, Lysyansky P, Edri O, et al. Differential effects of coronary artery stenosis on myocardial function: the value of myocardial strain analysis for the detection of coronary artery disease. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2011;24(7):748-57. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.echo.2011.03.007

  32. Gaibazzi N, Pigazzani F, Reverberi C, Porter TR. Rest global longitudinal 2D strain to detect coronary artery disease in patients undergoing stress echocardiography: a comparison with wall-motion and coronary flow reserve responses. Echo Res Pract. 2014];1(2):61-70. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1530/erp-14-0020

  33. Biering-Sørensen T, Hoffmann S, Mogelvang R, Zeeberg Iversen A, Galatius S, Fritz-Hansen T, et al. Myocardial strain analysis by 2-dimensional speckle tracking echocardiography improves diagnostics of coronary artery stenosis in stable angina pectoris. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging. 2014;7(1):58-65. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1161/circimaging.113.000989

  34. Bakhoum S, Taha HS, Abdelmonem YY, Fahim M. Value of resting myocardial deformation assessment by two dimensional speckle tracking echocardiography to predict the presence, extent and localization of coronary artery affection in patients with suspected stable coronary artery disease. Egypt Heart J. 2016;68(3):171-9. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ehj.2016.02.001




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com