Rodríguez AMÁ, Coloma BCA, Pino PA, Zamora SO, Pérez MG

Language: Spanish
References: 21
Page: 1-13
PDF size: 339.40 Kb.

ABSTRACT

Introduction: The anatomy of the bile duct considered normal is estimated to occur in approximately half of all human beings, since, frequently, there are variants of normality that involve the hepatic ducts, the common bile duct, and the cystic duct.
Objective: To describe the anatomical variants of the bile duct diagnosed by endoscopic retrograde cholangiopangreatography.
Methods: A retrospective, descriptive, observational study was carried out, which consisted in an analysis of images from the endoscopic retrograde cholangiopangreatography archive of Hermanos Ameijeiras Clinical-Surgical Hospital corresponding to the months between September 2015 and December 2017.
Results: 26.9% of the cases presented anatomical variants of the bile duct. 38.5% of them corresponded to the hepatic ducts. 52.8% were present in the cystic duct. There were no anatomical variations of the common bile duct.
Conclusions: The variants of normality in the bile ducts are dissimilar and frequent (around one third of the cases), which raises the need to know and identify them with any of the imaging techniques. Thus, surgical complications can be avoided in the future.

REFERENCES

1. Tolino MJ, Tartaglione AS, Sturletti CD, García MI. Variedades anatómicas del árbol biliar. Implicancia quirúrgica. Int J Morphol. 2014;28(4):1235-40.

2. Sarol JC, De la Torre E, Rodríguez MA. Atlas de Colangiopancreatografía Endoscópica. Editorial Ciencia y Cultura Latinoamericana. México. 1997.

3. Clearfield HR. Anatomy and anomalies of the biliary tract. In: Berk JE, Haubrich WS, Kalser MH, et al, editores. Bockus Gastroenterology. 9th Ed. Philadelphia: WB Saunders; 2015;2549-53.

4. Gore RM, Taylor AJ, Fulchner AS. Anomalies and anatomic variants of gallbladder and biliary tract. In: Gore RM, Levine MS, editores. Textbook of Gastointestinal Radiology. 6thd Ed. Philadelphia: WB Saunders. 2014;1621-34.

5. Rodriguez MA. Estudios Radiológicos del tubo digestivo (Capítulo 29). En: Paniagua M, Piñol F. Editores. Gastroenterología y Hepatología Clínica. ECIMED. 2015 (ISBN: 978-959-212-933-7)

6. Kullman E, Borch K, Lindstrom E, Svanvik J, Anderberg B. Value of routine intraoperative cholangiography in detecting aberrant bile ducts and bile duct injuries during laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Br J Surg. 1996;83(2):171-75.

7. 7- Adkins RB, Chapman WC, Reddy VS. Embryology, anatomy, and surgical applications of the extrahepatic biliary system. Surg Clin North Am. 2000;80:363-79.

8. Nari GA, Viotto L, Gil F, Lamoratta F, Layún J, Arias A, et al. Lesión quirúrgica de la vía biliar de la variante anatómica de la confluencia tipo F. Importancia de la colangiografía intra-operatoria sistemática y las alternativas terapéutica. Acta Gastroenterol Latinoam 2015;45:303-6.

9. Sezgin O, Altintas E, Üçbilek E. Ectopic opening of the common bile duct into various sites of the upper digestive tract: a case series. Gastrointest Endosc 2010;72:198-203.

10. Taghavi SA, Niknam R, Alavi SE, Ejtehadi F, Sivandzadeh GR, Eshraghian A. Anatomical variations of the biliary tree found with endoscopic retrograde cholagiopancreatograhy in a referral center in Southern Iran. Middle East J Dig Dis 2017;9:201-5.

11. Cova J, Louis C. Variantes anatómicas de las vías biliares: diagnóstico por CPRE y su relación con enfermedades biliares. Gen 2016;70(1).

12. Aguirre OI, Fernández CE, González AJ, Cárdenas LE, Beristaín HJ. Variantes anatómicas de la vía biliar por colangiografía endoscópica. Rev Gastroenterol México 2011;76(4):330-8.

13. Simeone DM. Gallbladder and biliary tract. In: Tadataka Y, Alpers DH, Kaplowitz N, editores. Textbook of Gastroenterology. 6.ª edición. Philadelphia: Linppicot Williams & Wlikins. 2014;2166-75.

14. Moreira VF, San Román A. Colangiopancreatografía retrógrada endoscópica (CPRE). Rev Esp Enferm Dig. 2009;101(8):580.

15. Uchiyama K, Tani M, Kawai M. Preoperative evaluation of the extrahepatic bile duct structure for laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Surg Endosc. 2006;20:1119-23.

16. Hasan MM, Reza E, Khan MR, Laila SZ, Rahman F, Mamun MH. Anatomical and congenital anomalies of extra hepatic biliary system encountered during cholecystectomy. Mymensingh Med J. 2014;22(1):20-6.

17. Abdelgawad MS, Eid M. Biliary tract variants in potential right lobe living donors for liver transplantation: Evaluation with MR cholangiopancreatography (MRCP). Egyp J Radiol Nuclear Med. 2014;43:53-7.

18. Basaran C, Agildere AM, Donmez FY, Sevmis S, Budakoglu I, Karakayali H, et al. MR cholangiopancreatography with T2-weighted prospective acquisition correction turbo spin-echo sequence of the biliary anatomy of potential living liver transplant donors. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2008;190(6):1527-33.

19. Minutoli F, Naso S, Visalli C. A new variant of cholecystohepatic duct: MR cholangiographydemonstration. Surg Radiol Anat. 2015;37:539-41.

20. Knight M. Anomalies of the gallbaladder bile ducts and arteries. In: Smith R, Sherlock S, editores. Surgery of the Gallbladder and Bile Ducts. 9th Ed. London, Butterworth. 2016;97-116.

21. Rosai J. Gallbladder and extrahepatic bile ducts. En: Rosai J, Acherman LV, editores. Rosai & Acherman´s Surgical Pathology. 9a edición. New York: Elsevier; 2014.1036-7.